@article {512, title = {Confirmation of the Role of DHX38 in the Etiology of Early-Onset Retinitis Pigmentosa.}, journal = {Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci}, volume = {59}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 09 04}, pages = {4552-4557}, abstract = {

Purpose: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a genetically heterogeneous trait with autosomal-recessive (ar) inheritance underlying 50\% of genetic disease cases. Sixty-one arRP genes have been identified, and recently, DHX38 has been reported as a potential candidate gene for arRP with only a single family reported with a variant of unknown significance. We identified a missense variant in DHX38 that co-segregates with the arRP phenotype in two Pakistani families confirming the involvement of DHX38 in the etiology of early-onset RP.

Methods: Exome sequencing was performed using two DNA samples from affected members of Pakistani families (MA88 and MA157) with early onset arRP. Sanger sequencing of DNA samples from all family members confirmed the segregation of candidate variant within both families.

Results: A novel missense DHX38 variant c.971G>A; p.(Arg324Gln) was identified which segregates with the arRP phenotype and yielded a logarithm of the odds (LOD) score of 5.0 and 4.3 for families MA88 and MA157, respectively. This variant is predicted to be conserved and deleterious by several bioinformatics tools.

Conclusions: We identified a second deleterious DHX38 variant that segregates with arRP in two families, providing additional evidence that DHX38 is involved in RP etiology. DHX38 encodes for pre-mRNA splicing factor PRP16, which is important in catalyzing pre-mRNA splicing.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Cataract, Computational Biology, DEAD-box RNA Helicases, Female, Genes, Recessive, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Linkage, Humans, Male, Mutation, Missense, Nucleotide Mapping, Ophthalmoscopy, Pedigree, Retinitis Pigmentosa, RNA Splicing Factors, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Whole Exome Sequencing, Young Adult}, issn = {1552-5783}, doi = {10.1167/iovs.18-23849}, author = {Latif, Zahid and Chakchouk, Imen and Schrauwen, Isabelle and Lee, Kwanghyuk and Santos-Cortez, Regie Lyn P and Abbe, Izoduwa and Acharya, Anushree and Jarral, Afeefa and Ali, Imran and Ullah, Ehsan and Khan, Muhammad Nasim and Ali, Ghazanfar and Tahir, Tufail Hussain and Bamshad, Michael J and Nickerson, Deborah A and Ahmad, Wasim and Ansar, Muhammad and Leal, Suzanne M} } @article {59, title = {Identification of Intellectual Disability Genes in Female Patients with a Skewed X-Inactivation Pattern.}, journal = {Hum Mutat}, volume = {37}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 08}, pages = {804-11}, abstract = {

Intellectual disability (ID) is a heterogeneous disorder with an unknown molecular etiology in many cases. Previously, X-linked ID (XLID) studies focused on males because of the hemizygous state of their X chromosome. Carrier females are generally unaffected because of the presence of a second normal allele, or inactivation of the mutant X chromosome in most of their cells (skewing). However, in female ID patients, we hypothesized that the presence of skewing of X-inactivation would be an indicator for an X chromosomal ID cause. We analyzed the X-inactivation patterns of 288 females with ID, and found that 22 (7.6\%) had extreme skewing (>90\%), which is significantly higher than observed in the general population (3.6\%; P~=~0.029). Whole-exome sequencing of 19 females with extreme skewing revealed causal variants in six females in the XLID genes DDX3X, NHS, WDR45, MECP2, and SMC1A. Interestingly, variants in genes escaping X-inactivation presumably cause both XLID and skewing of X-inactivation in three of these patients. Moreover, variants likely accounting for skewing only were detected in MED12, HDAC8, and TAF9B. All tested candidate causative variants were de novo events. Hence, extreme skewing is a good indicator for the presence of X-linked variants in female patients.

}, keywords = {Carrier Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DEAD-box RNA Helicases, Exome, Female, Genetic Variation, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2, Nuclear Proteins, Sequence Analysis, DNA, X Chromosome Inactivation}, issn = {1098-1004}, doi = {10.1002/humu.23012}, author = {Fieremans, Nathalie and Van Esch, Hilde and Holvoet, Maureen and Van Goethem, Gert and Devriendt, Koenraad and Rosello, Monica and Mayo, Sonia and Martinez, Francisco and Jhangiani, Shalini and Muzny, Donna M and Gibbs, Richard A and Lupski, James R and Vermeesch, Joris R and Marynen, Peter and Froyen, Guy} } @article {73, title = {Two novel germline DDX41 mutations in a family with inherited myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukemia.}, journal = {Haematologica}, volume = {101}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 06}, pages = {e228-31}, keywords = {DEAD-box RNA Helicases, Family, Female, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Male, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Neoplasm Proteins}, issn = {1592-8721}, doi = {10.3324/haematol.2015.139790}, author = {Li, Ruijuan and Sobreira, Nara and Witmer, P Dane and Pratz, Keith W and Braunstein, Evan M} } @article {234, title = {Germ-line and somatic DICER1 mutations in pineoblastoma.}, journal = {Acta Neuropathol}, volume = {128}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Oct}, pages = {583-95}, abstract = {

Germ-line RB-1 mutations predispose to pineoblastoma (PinB), but other predisposing genetic factors are not well established. We recently identified a germ-line DICER1 mutation in a child with a PinB. This was accompanied by loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele within the tumour. We set out to establish the prevalence of DICER1 mutations in an opportunistically ascertained series of PinBs. Twenty-one PinB cases were studied: Eighteen cases had not undergone previous testing for DICER1 mutations; three patients were known carriers of germ-line DICER1 mutations. The eighteen PinBs were sequenced by Sanger and/or Fluidigm-based next-generation sequencing to identify DICER1 mutations in blood gDNA and/or tumour gDNA. Testing for somatic DICER1 mutations was also conducted on one case with a known germ-line DICER1 mutation. From the eighteen PinBs, we identified four deleterious DICER1 mutations, three of which were germ line in origin, and one for which a germ line versus somatic origin could not be determined; in all four, the second allele was also inactivated leading to complete loss of DICER1 protein. No somatic DICER1 RNase IIIb mutations were identified. One PinB arising in a germ-line DICER1 mutation carrier was found to have LOH. This study suggests that germ-line DICER1 mutations make a clinically significant contribution to PinB, establishing DICER1 as an important susceptibility gene for PinB and demonstrates PinB to be a manifestation of a germ-line DICER1 mutation. The means by which the second allele is inactivated may differ from other DICER1-related tumours.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, DEAD-box RNA Helicases, DNA Mutational Analysis, Family Health, Female, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Infant, Male, Pineal Gland, Pinealoma, Ribonuclease III, Young Adult}, issn = {1432-0533}, doi = {10.1007/s00401-014-1318-7}, author = {de Kock, Leanne and Sabbaghian, Nelly and Druker, Harriet and Weber, Evan and Hamel, Nancy and Miller, Suzanne and Choong, Catherine S and Gottardo, Nicholas G and Kees, Ursula R and Rednam, Surya P and van Hest, Liselotte P and Jongmans, Marjolijn C and Jhangiani, Shalini and Lupski, James R and Zacharin, Margaret and Bouron-Dal Soglio, Doroth{\'e}e and Huang, Annie and Priest, John R and Perry, Arie and Mueller, Sabine and Albrecht, Steffen and Malkin, David and Grundy, Richard G and Foulkes, William D} }