@article {426, title = {Contribution of rare inherited and de novo variants in 2,871 congenital heart disease probands.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {49}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Nov}, pages = {1593-1601}, abstract = {

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of mortality from birth defects. Here, exome sequencing of a single cohort of 2,871 CHD probands, including 2,645 parent-offspring trios, implicated rare inherited mutations in 1.8\%, including a recessive founder mutation in GDF1 accounting for \~{}5\% of severe CHD in Ashkenazim, recessive genotypes in MYH6 accounting for \~{}11\% of Shone complex, and dominant FLT4 mutations accounting for 2.3\% of Tetralogy of Fallot. De novo mutations (DNMs) accounted for 8\% of cases, including \~{}3\% of isolated CHD patients and \~{}28\% with both neurodevelopmental and extra-cardiac congenital anomalies. Seven genes surpassed thresholds for genome-wide significance, and 12 genes not previously implicated in CHD had >70\% probability of being disease related. DNMs in \~{}440 genes were inferred to contribute to CHD. Striking overlap between genes with damaging DNMs in probands with CHD and autism was also found.

}, keywords = {Adult, Autistic Disorder, Cardiac Myosins, Case-Control Studies, Child, Exome, Female, Gene Expression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Growth Differentiation Factor 1, Heart Defects, Congenital, Heterozygote, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Homozygote, Humans, Male, Mutation, Myosin Heavy Chains, Pedigree, Risk, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/ng.3970}, author = {Jin, Sheng Chih and Homsy, Jason and Zaidi, Samir and Lu, Qiongshi and Morton, Sarah and DePalma, Steven R and Zeng, Xue and Qi, Hongjian and Chang, Weni and Sierant, Michael C and Hung, Wei-Chien and Haider, Shozeb and Zhang, Junhui and Knight, James and Bjornson, Robert D and Castaldi, Christopher and Tikhonoa, Irina R and Bilguvar, Kaya and Mane, Shrikant M and Sanders, Stephan J and Mital, Seema and Russell, Mark W and Gaynor, J William and Deanfield, John and Giardini, Alessandro and Porter, George A and Srivastava, Deepak and Lo, Cecelia W and Shen, Yufeng and Watkins, W Scott and Yandell, Mark and Yost, H Joseph and Tristani-Firouzi, Martin and Newburger, Jane W and Roberts, Amy E and Kim, Richard and Zhao, Hongyu and Kaltman, Jonathan R and Goldmuntz, Elizabeth and Chung, Wendy K and Seidman, Jonathan G and Gelb, Bruce D and Seidman, Christine E and Lifton, Richard P and Brueckner, Martina} } @article {64, title = {Genetic Candidate Variants in Two Multigenerational Families with Childhood Apraxia of Speech.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {11}, year = {2016}, month = {2016}, pages = {e0153864}, abstract = {

Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a severe and socially debilitating form of speech sound disorder with suspected genetic involvement, but the genetic etiology is not yet well understood. Very few known or putative causal genes have been identified to date, e.g., FOXP2 and BCL11A. Building a knowledge base of the genetic etiology of CAS will make it possible to identify infants at genetic risk and motivate the development of effective very early intervention programs. We investigated the genetic etiology of CAS in two large multigenerational families with familial CAS. Complementary genomic methods included Markov chain Monte Carlo linkage analysis, copy-number analysis, identity-by-descent sharing, and exome sequencing with variant filtering. No overlaps in regions with positive evidence of linkage between the two families were found. In one family, linkage analysis detected two chromosomal regions of interest, 5p15.1-p14.1, and 17p13.1-q11.1, inherited separately from the two founders. Single-point linkage analysis of selected variants identified CDH18 as a primary gene of interest and additionally, MYO10, NIPBL, GLP2R, NCOR1, FLCN, SMCR8, NEK8, and ANKRD12, possibly with additive effects. Linkage analysis in the second family detected five regions with LOD scores approaching the highest values possible in the family. A gene of interest was C4orf21 (ZGRF1) on 4q25-q28.2. Evidence for previously described causal copy-number variations and validated or suspected genes was not found. Results are consistent with a heterogeneous CAS etiology, as is expected in many neurogenic disorders. Future studies will investigate genome variants in these and other families with CAS.

}, keywords = {Apraxias, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exome, Female, Genetic Linkage, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Lod Score, Male, Pedigree, Risk, Speech}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0153864}, author = {Peter, Beate and Wijsman, Ellen M and Nato, Alejandro Q and Matsushita, Mark M and Chapman, Kathy L and Stanaway, Ian B and Wolff, John and Oda, Kaori and Gabo, Virginia B and Raskind, Wendy H} } @article {169, title = {Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.}, journal = {Trends Genet}, volume = {31}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul}, pages = {382-92}, abstract = {

Nearly all of the genetic material among cells within an organism is identical. However, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions (indels), copy-number variants (CNVs), and other structural variants (SVs) continually accumulate as cells divide during development. This process results in an organism composed of countless cells, each with its own unique personal genome. Thus, every human is undoubtedly mosaic. Mosaic mutations can go unnoticed, underlie genetic disease or normal human variation, and may be transmitted to the next generation as constitutional variants. We review the influence of the developmental timing of mutations, the mechanisms by which they arise, methods for detecting mosaic variants, and the risk of passing these mutations on to the next generation.

}, keywords = {Animals, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Humans, Mosaicism, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion}, issn = {0168-9525}, doi = {10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.013}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Lupski, James R} } @article {229, title = {Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Aug 07}, pages = {173-82}, abstract = {

New human mutations are thought to originate in germ cells, thus making a recurrence of the same mutation in a sibling exceedingly rare. However, increasing sensitivity of genomic technologies has anecdotally revealed mosaicism for mutations in somatic tissues of apparently healthy parents. Such somatically mosaic parents might also have germline mosaicism that can potentially cause unexpected intergenerational recurrences. Here, we show that somatic mosaicism for transmitted mutations among parents of children with simplex genetic disease is more common than currently appreciated. Using the sensitivity of individual-specific breakpoint PCR, we prospectively screened 100 families with children affected by genomic disorders due to rare deletion copy-number variants (CNVs) determined to be de novo by clinical analysis of parental DNA. Surprisingly, we identified four cases of low-level somatic mosaicism for the transmitted CNV in DNA isolated from parental blood. Integrated probabilistic modeling of gametogenesis developed in response to our observations predicts that mutations in parental blood increase recurrence risk substantially more than parental mutations confined to the germline. Moreover, despite the fact that maternally transmitted mutations are the minority of alleles, our model suggests that sexual dimorphisms in gametogenesis result in a greater proportion of somatically mosaic transmitting mothers who are thus at increased risk of recurrence. Therefore, somatic mosaicism together with sexual differences in gametogenesis might explain a considerable fraction of unexpected recurrences of X-linked recessive disease. Overall, our results underscore an important role for somatic mosaicism and mitotic replicative mutational mechanisms in transmission genetics.

}, keywords = {Cell Division, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Mosaicism, Mutation, Pedigree, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk, Sex Characteristics, Smith-Magenis Syndrome}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.003}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Yuan, Bo and Robberecht, Caroline and Pfundt, Rolph and Szafranski, Przemyslaw and McEntagart, Meriel E and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Bartnik, Magdalena and Wi{\'s}niowiecka-Kowalnik, Barbara and Plunkett, Katie S and Pursley, Amber N and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Vast, Mala and Marks, Karen and Patton, Michael and Olofsson, Peter and Patel, Ankita and Veltman, Joris A and Cheung, Sau Wai and Shaw, Chad A and Vissers, Lisenka E L M and Vermeesch, Joris R and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {291, title = {Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {310}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jul 24}, pages = {365-6}, keywords = {Disclosure, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, Humans, Incidental Findings, Mandatory Reporting, Mutation, Personal Autonomy, Risk, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2013.41703}, author = {Green, Robert C and Lupski, James R and Biesecker, Leslie G} }