@article {1022, title = {POLRMT mutations impair mitochondrial transcription causing neurological disease.}, journal = {Nat Commun}, volume = {12}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 02 18}, pages = {1135}, abstract = {

While >300 disease-causing variants have been identified in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymerase γ, no mitochondrial phenotypes have been associated with POLRMT, the RNA polymerase responsible for transcription of the mitochondrial genome. Here, we characterise the clinical and molecular nature of POLRMT variants in eight individuals from seven unrelated families. Patients present with global developmental delay, hypotonia, short stature, and speech/intellectual disability in childhood; one subject displayed an indolent progressive external ophthalmoplegia phenotype. Massive parallel sequencing of all subjects identifies recessive and dominant variants in the POLRMT gene. Patient fibroblasts have a defect in mitochondrial mRNA synthesis, but no mtDNA deletions or copy number abnormalities. The in vitro characterisation of the recombinant POLRMT mutants reveals variable, but deleterious effects on mitochondrial transcription. Together, our in vivo and in vitro functional studies of POLRMT variants establish defective mitochondrial transcription as an important disease mechanism.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Child, DNA, Mitochondrial, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Female, Fibroblasts, Humans, Infant, Male, Mitochondria, Mutation, Nervous System Diseases, Oxidative Phosphorylation, Pedigree, Protein Domains, Protein Subunits, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Young Adult}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-021-21279-0}, author = {Ol{\'a}hov{\'a}, Monika and Peter, Bradley and Szilagyi, Zsolt and Diaz-Maldonado, Hector and Singh, Meenakshi and Sommerville, Ewen W and Blakely, Emma L and Collier, Jack J and Hoberg, Emily and Str{\'a}neck{\'y}, Viktor and Hartmannov{\'a}, Hana and Bleyer, Anthony J and McBride, Kim L and Bowden, Sasigarn A and Korandov{\'a}, Zuzana and Pecinov{\'a}, Alena and Ropers, Hans-Hilger and Kahrizi, Kimia and Najmabadi, Hossein and Tarnopolsky, Mark A and Brady, Lauren I and Weaver, K Nicole and Prada, Carlos E and {\~O}unap, Katrin and Wojcik, Monica H and Pajusalu, Sander and Syeda, Safoora B and Pais, Lynn and Estrella, Elicia A and Bruels, Christine C and Kunkel, Louis M and Kang, Peter B and Bonnen, Penelope E and Mr{\'a}{\v c}ek, Tom{\'a}{\v s} and Kmoch, Stanislav and Gorman, Gr{\'a}inne S and Falkenberg, Maria and Gustafsson, Claes M and Taylor, Robert W} } @article {569, title = {Comparative genomic analysis of embryonic, lineage-converted and stem cell-derived motor neurons.}, journal = {Development}, volume = {145}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 11 21}, abstract = {

Advances in stem cell science allow the production of different cell types either through the recapitulation of developmental processes, often termed {\textquoteright}directed differentiation{\textquoteright}, or the forced expression of lineage-specific transcription factors. Although cells produced by both approaches are increasingly used in translational applications, their quantitative similarity to their primary counterparts remains largely unresolved. To investigate the similarity between -derived and primary cell types, we harvested and purified mouse spinal motor neurons and compared them with motor neurons produced by transcription factor-mediated lineage conversion of fibroblasts or directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. To enable unbiased analysis of these motor neuron types and their cells of origin, we then subjected them to whole transcriptome and DNA methylome analysis by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS). Despite major differences in methodology, lineage conversion and directed differentiation both produce cells that closely approximate the primary motor neuron state. However, we identify differences in Fas signaling, the Hox code and synaptic gene expression between lineage-converted and directed differentiation motor neurons that affect their utility in translational studies.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cell Lineage, Embryo, Mammalian, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genomics, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Neurons, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Transcription, Genetic}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.168617}, author = {Ichida, Justin K and Staats, Kim A and Davis-Dusenbery, Brandi N and Clement, Kendell and Galloway, Kate E and Babos, Kimberly N and Shi, Yingxiao and Son, Esther Y and Kiskinis, Evangelos and Atwater, Nicholas and Gu, Hongcang and Gnirke, Andreas and Meissner, Alexander and Eggan, Kevin} } @article {338, title = {Mutations in EBF3 Disturb Transcriptional Profiles and Cause Intellectual Disability, Ataxia, and Facial Dysmorphism.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {100}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jan 05}, pages = {117-127}, abstract = {

From a GeneMatcher-enabled international collaboration, we identified ten individuals affected by intellectual disability, speech delay, ataxia, and facial dysmorphism and carrying a deleterious EBF3 variant detected by whole-exome sequencing. One 9-bp duplication and one splice-site, five missense, and two nonsense variants in EBF3 were found; the mutations occurred de novo in eight individuals, and the missense variant c.625C>T (p.Arg209Trp) was inherited by two affected siblings from their healthy mother, who is mosaic. EBF3 belongs to the early B cell factor family (also known as Olf, COE, or O/E) and is a transcription factor involved in neuronal differentiation and maturation. Structural assessment predicted that the five amino acid substitutions have damaging effects on DNA binding of EBF3. Transient expression of EBF3 mutant proteins in HEK293T cells revealed mislocalization of all but one mutant in the cytoplasm, as well as nuclear localization. By transactivation assays, all EBF3 mutants showed significantly reduced or no ability to activate transcription of the reporter gene CDKN1A, and in~situ subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrated that EBF3 mutant proteins were less tightly associated with chromatin. Finally, in RNA-seq and ChIP-seq experiments, EBF3 acted as a transcriptional regulator, and mutant EBF3 had reduced genome-wide DNA binding and gene-regulatory activity. Our findings demonstrate that variants disrupting EBF3-mediated transcriptional regulation cause intellectual disability and developmental delay and are present in \~{}0.1\% of individuals with unexplained neurodevelopmental disorders.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Amino Acid Substitution, Ataxia, Child, Child, Preschool, Chromatin, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, Developmental Disabilities, Exome, Face, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Reporter, HEK293 Cells, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Language Development Disorders, Male, Models, Molecular, Mosaicism, Mutation, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Protein Transport, Syndrome, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.11.012}, author = {Harms, Frederike Leonie and Girisha, Katta M and Hardigan, Andrew A and Kort{\"u}m, Fanny and Shukla, Anju and Alawi, Malik and Dalal, Ashwin and Brady, Lauren and Tarnopolsky, Mark and Bird, Lynne M and Ceulemans, Sophia and Bebin, Martina and Bowling, Kevin M and Hiatt, Susan M and Lose, Edward J and Primiano, Michelle and Chung, Wendy K and Juusola, Jane and Akdemir, Zeynep C and Bainbridge, Matthew and Charng, Wu-Lin and Drummond-Borg, Margaret and Eldomery, Mohammad K and El-Hattab, Ayman W and Saleh, Mohammed A M and B{\'e}zieau, St{\'e}phane and Cogn{\'e}, Benjamin and Isidor, Bertrand and K{\"u}ry, S{\'e}bastien and Lupski, James R and Myers, Richard M and Cooper, Gregory M and Kutsche, Kerstin} } @article {103, title = {Chimeric transcripts resulting from complex duplications in chromosome Xq28.}, journal = {Hum Genet}, volume = {135}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Feb}, pages = {253-6}, abstract = {

Gene fusions have been observed in somatic alterations in cancer and in schizophrenia. However, the underlying mechanism(s) for their formation are poorly understood. We experimentally demonstrated the expression of splicing variants of in silico predicted chimeric genes F8/CSAG1 and BCAP31/TEX28 in two individuals with de novo complex genomic rearrangements of Xq28; F8/CSAG1 includes exonization of an ERVL-MaLR intronic repetitive element. We provide evidence that replicative repair may contribute to exon shuffling processes and diversify the repertoire of expressed transcripts.

}, keywords = {Antigens, Neoplasm, Base Sequence, Cell Line, Chromosomes, Human, X, Exons, Gene Duplication, Gene Expression Regulation, Gene Rearrangement, Humans, Introns, Male, Membrane Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Neoplasm Proteins, RNA Splicing, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic}, issn = {1432-1203}, doi = {10.1007/s00439-015-1614-x}, author = {Zuccherato, Luciana W and Alleva, Benjamin and Whiters, Marjorie A and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Lupski, James R} } @article {322, title = {Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: consequences of chromatin relaxation.}, journal = {Curr Opin Neurol}, volume = {25}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Oct}, pages = {614-20}, abstract = {

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, we have seen remarkable progress in our understanding of the disease mechanism underlying facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of the disease mechanism and to discuss the observations supporting the possibility of a developmental defect in this disorder.

RECENT FINDINGS: In the majority of cases, FSHD is caused by contraction of the D4Z4 repeat array (FSHD1). This results in local chromatin relaxation and stable expression of the DUX4 retrogene in skeletal muscle, but only when a polymorphic DUX4 polyadenylation signal is present. In some cases (FSHD2), D4Z4 chromatin relaxation and stable DUX4 expression occur in the absence of D4Z4 array contraction. DUX4 is a germline transcription factor and its expression in skeletal muscle leads to activation of early stem cell and germline programs and transcriptional activation of retroelements.

SUMMARY: Recent studies have provided a plausible disease mechanism for FSHD in which FSHD results from inappropriate expression of the germline transcription factor DUX4. The genes regulated by DUX4 suggest several mechanisms of muscle damage, and provide potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets that should be investigated in future studies.

}, keywords = {Animals, Chromatin, Homeodomain Proteins, Humans, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral, Transcription, Genetic}, issn = {1473-6551}, doi = {10.1097/WCO.0b013e328357f22d}, author = {van der Maarel, Silv{\`e}re M and Miller, Daniel G and Tawil, Rabi and Filippova, Galina N and Tapscott, Stephen J} }