@article {812, title = {A genome-wide case-only test for the detection of digenic inheritance in human exomes.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {117}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 08 11}, pages = {19367-19375}, abstract = {

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has facilitated the discovery of genetic lesions underlying monogenic disorders. Incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity suggest a contribution of additional genetic lesions to clinical manifestations and outcome. Some monogenic disorders may therefore actually be digenic. However, only a few digenic disorders have been reported, all discovered by candidate gene approaches applied to at least one locus. We propose here a two-locus genome-wide test for detecting digenic inheritance in WES data. This approach uses the gene as the unit of analysis and tests all pairs of genes to detect pairwise gene {\texttimes} gene interactions underlying disease. It is a case-only method, which has several advantages over classic case-control tests, in particular by avoiding recruitment of controls. Our simulation studies based on real WES data identified two major sources of type I error inflation in this case-only test: linkage disequilibrium and population stratification. Both were corrected by specific procedures. Moreover, our case-only approach is more powerful than the corresponding case-control test for detecting digenic interactions in various population stratification scenarios. Finally, we confirmed the potential of our unbiased, genome-wide approach by successfully identifying a previously reported digenic lesion in patients with craniosynostosis. Our case-only test is a powerful and timely tool for detecting digenic inheritance in WES data from patients.

}, keywords = {Craniosynostoses, Epistasis, Genetic, Exome, Genetic Linkage, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1920650117}, author = {Kerner, Gaspard and Bouaziz, Matthieu and Cobat, Aurelie and Bigio, Benedetta and Timberlake, Andrew T and Bustamante, Jacinta and Lifton, Richard P and Casanova, Jean-Laurent and Abel, Laurent} } @article {843, title = {Major Impacts of Widespread Structural Variation on Gene Expression and Crop Improvement in Tomato.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {182}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 07 09}, pages = {145-161.e23}, abstract = {

Structural variants (SVs) underlie important crop improvement and domestication traits. However, resolving the extent, diversity, and quantitative impact of SVs has been challenging. We used long-read nanopore sequencing to capture 238,490 SVs in 100 diverse tomato lines. This panSV genome, along with 14 new reference assemblies, revealed large-scale intermixing of diverse genotypes, as well as thousands of SVs intersecting genes and cis-regulatory regions. Hundreds of SV-gene pairs exhibit subtle and significant expression changes, which could broadly influence quantitative trait variation. By combining quantitative genetics with genome editing, we show how multiple SVs that changed gene dosage and expression levels modified fruit flavor, size, and production. In the last example, higher order epistasis among four SVs affecting three related transcription factors allowed introduction of an important harvesting trait in modern tomato. Our findings highlight the underexplored role of SVs in genotype-to-phenotype relationships and their widespread importance and utility in crop improvement.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Crops, Agricultural, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, Ecotype, Epistasis, Genetic, Fruit, Gene Duplication, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Genome, Plant, Genomic Structural Variation, Genotype, Inbreeding, Lycopersicon esculentum, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Phenotype, Plant Breeding, Quantitative Trait Loci}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.021}, author = {Alonge, Michael and Wang, Xingang and Benoit, Matthias and Soyk, Sebastian and Pereira, Lara and Zhang, Lei and Suresh, Hamsini and Ramakrishnan, Srividya and Maumus, Florian and Ciren, Danielle and Levy, Yuval and Harel, Tom Hai and Shalev-Schlosser, Gili and Amsellem, Ziva and Razifard, Hamid and Caicedo, Ana L and Tieman, Denise M and Klee, Harry and Kirsche, Melanie and Aganezov, Sergey and Ranallo-Benavidez, T Rhyker and Lemmon, Zachary H and Kim, Jennifer and Robitaille, Gina and Kramer, Melissa and Goodwin, Sara and McCombie, W Richard and Hutton, Samuel and Van Eck, Joyce and Gillis, Jesse and Eshed, Yuval and Sedlazeck, Fritz J and van der Knaap, Esther and Schatz, Michael C and Lippman, Zachary B} } @article {537, title = {Disruptions in asymmetric centrosome inheritance and WDR62-Aurora kinase B interactions in primary microcephaly.}, journal = {Sci Rep}, volume = {7}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 03 08}, pages = {43708}, abstract = {

Recessive mutations in WD repeat domain 62 (WDR62) cause microcephaly and a wide spectrum of severe brain malformations. Disruption of the mouse ortholog results in microcephaly underlain by reduced proliferation of neocortical progenitors during late neurogenesis, abnormalities in asymmetric centrosome inheritance leading to neuronal migration delays, and altered neuronal differentiation. Spindle pole localization of WDR62 and mitotic progression are defective in patient-derived fibroblasts, which, similar to mouse neocortical progenitors, transiently arrest at prometaphase. Expression of WDR62 is closely correlated with components of the chromosome passenger complex (CPC), a key regulator of mitosis. Wild type WDR62, but not disease-associated mutant forms, interacts with the CPC core enzyme Aurora kinase B and staining of CPC components at centromeres is altered in patient-derived fibroblasts. Our findings demonstrate critical and diverse functions of WDR62 in neocortical development and provide insight into the mechanisms by which its disruption leads to a plethora of structural abnormalities.

}, keywords = {Animals, Aurora Kinase B, Brain, Cell Cycle, Cell Differentiation, Cell Proliferation, Centrosome, Consanguinity, Disease Models, Animal, Epistasis, Genetic, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Gene Expression, Humans, Inheritance Patterns, Male, Mice, Mice, Knockout, Microcephaly, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neural Stem Cells, Pedigree, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {2045-2322}, doi = {10.1038/srep43708}, author = {Sgourdou, Paraskevi and Mishra-Gorur, Ketu and Saotome, Ichiko and Henagariu, Octavian and Tuysuz, Beyhan and Campos, Cynthia and Ishigame, Keiko and Giannikou, Krinio and Quon, Jennifer L and {\v S}estan, Nenad and {\c C}a{\u g}layan, Ahmet O and G{\"u}nel, Murat and Louvi, Angeliki} }