@article {483,
	title = {De Novo Variants in the F-Box Protein FBXO11 in 20 Individuals with a Variable Neurodevelopmental Disorder.},
	journal = {Am J Hum Genet},
	volume = {103},
	year = {2018},
	month = {2018 08 02},
	pages = {305-316},
	abstract = {<p>Next-generation sequencing combined with international data sharing has enormously facilitated identification of new disease-associated genes and mutations. This is particularly true for genetically extremely heterogeneous entities such as neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Through exome sequencing and world-wide collaborations, we identified and assembled 20 individuals with de novo variants in FBXO11. They present with mild to severe developmental delay associated with a range of features including short (4/20) or tall (2/20) stature, obesity (5/20), microcephaly (4/19) or macrocephaly (2/19), behavioral problems (17/20), seizures (5/20), cleft lip or palate or bifid uvula (3/20), and minor skeletal anomalies. FBXO11 encodes a member of the F-Box protein family, constituting a subunit of an E3-ubiquitin ligase complex. This complex is involved in ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation and thus in controlling critical biological processes by regulating protein turnover. The identified de novo aberrations comprise two large deletions, ten likely gene disrupting variants, and eight missense variants distributed throughout FBXO11. Structural modeling for missense variants located in the CASH or the Zinc-finger UBR domains suggests destabilization of the protein. This, in combination with the observed spectrum and localization of identified variants and the lack of apparent genotype-phenotype correlations, is compatible with loss of function or haploinsufficiency as an underlying mechanism. We implicate de novo missense and likely gene disrupting variants in FBXO11 in a neurodevelopmental disorder with variable intellectual disability and various other features.</p>},
	issn = {1537-6605},
	doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.003},
	author = {Gregor, Anne and Sadleir, Lynette G and Asadollahi, Reza and Azzarello-Burri, Silvia and Battaglia, Agatino and Ousager, Lilian Bomme and Boonsawat, Paranchai and Bruel, Ange-Line and Buchert, Rebecca and Calpena, Eduardo and Cogn{\'e}, Benjamin and Dallapiccola, Bruno and Distelmaier, Felix and Elmslie, Frances and Faivre, Laurence and Haack, Tobias B and Harrison, Victoria and Henderson, Alex and Hunt, David and Isidor, Bertrand and Joset, Pascal and Kumada, Satoko and Lachmeijer, Augusta M A and Lees, Melissa and Lynch, Sally Ann and Martinez, Francisco and Matsumoto, Naomichi and McDougall, Carey and Mefford, Heather C and Miyake, Noriko and Myers, Candace T and Moutton, S{\'e}bastien and Nesbitt, Addie and Novelli, Antonio and Orellana, Carmen and Rauch, Anita and Rosello, Monica and Saida, Ken and Santani, Avni B and Sarkar, Ajoy and Scheffer, Ingrid E and Shinawi, Marwan and Steindl, Katharina and Symonds, Joseph D and Zackai, Elaine H and Reis, Andr{\'e} and Sticht, Heinrich and Zweier, Christiane}
}
@article {59,
	title = {Identification of Intellectual Disability Genes in Female Patients with a Skewed X-Inactivation Pattern.},
	journal = {Hum Mutat},
	volume = {37},
	year = {2016},
	month = {2016 08},
	pages = {804-11},
	abstract = {<p>Intellectual disability (ID) is a heterogeneous disorder with an unknown molecular etiology in many cases. Previously, X-linked ID (XLID) studies focused on males because of the hemizygous state of their X chromosome. Carrier females are generally unaffected because of the presence of a second normal allele, or inactivation of the mutant X chromosome in most of their cells (skewing). However, in female ID patients, we hypothesized that the presence of skewing of X-inactivation would be an indicator for an X chromosomal ID cause. We analyzed the X-inactivation patterns of 288 females with ID, and found that 22 (7.6\%) had extreme skewing (>90\%), which is significantly higher than observed in the general population (3.6\%; P~=~0.029). Whole-exome sequencing of 19 females with extreme skewing revealed causal variants in six females in the XLID genes DDX3X, NHS, WDR45, MECP2, and SMC1A. Interestingly, variants in genes escaping X-inactivation presumably cause both XLID and skewing of X-inactivation in three of these patients. Moreover, variants likely accounting for skewing only were detected in MED12, HDAC8, and TAF9B. All tested candidate causative variants were de novo events. Hence, extreme skewing is a good indicator for the presence of X-linked variants in female patients.</p>},
	keywords = {Carrier Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DEAD-box RNA Helicases, Exome, Female, Genetic Variation, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2, Nuclear Proteins, Sequence Analysis, DNA, X Chromosome Inactivation},
	issn = {1098-1004},
	doi = {10.1002/humu.23012},
	author = {Fieremans, Nathalie and Van Esch, Hilde and Holvoet, Maureen and Van Goethem, Gert and Devriendt, Koenraad and Rosello, Monica and Mayo, Sonia and Martinez, Francisco and Jhangiani, Shalini and Muzny, Donna M and Gibbs, Richard A and Lupski, James R and Vermeesch, Joris R and Marynen, Peter and Froyen, Guy}
}
