@article {805, title = {Recurrent Rare Copy Number Variants Increase Risk for Esotropia.}, journal = {Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci}, volume = {61}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 08 03}, pages = {22}, abstract = {

Purpose: To determine whether rare copy number variants (CNVs) increase risk for comitant esotropia.

Methods: CNVs were identified in 1614 Caucasian individuals with comitant esotropia and 3922 Caucasian controls from Illumina SNP genotyping using two Hidden Markov model (HMM) algorithms, PennCNV and QuantiSNP, which call CNVs based on logR ratio and B allele frequency. Deletions and duplications greater than 10 kb were included. Common CNVs were excluded. Association testing was performed with 1 million permutations in PLINK. Significant CNVs were confirmed with digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Whole genome sequencing was performed to determine insertion location and breakpoints.

Results: Esotropia patients have similar rates and proportions of CNVs compared with controls but greater total length and average size of both deletions and duplications. Three recurrent rare duplications significantly (P = 1 {\texttimes} 10-6) increase the risk of esotropia: chromosome 2p11.2 (hg19, 2:87428677-87965359), spanning one long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) and two microRNAs (OR 14.16; 95\% confidence interval [CI] 5.4-38.1); chromosome 4p15.2 (hg19, 4:25554332-25577184), spanning one lncRNA (OR 11.1; 95\% CI 4.6-25.2); chromosome 10q11.22 (hg19, 10:47049547-47703870) spanning seven protein-coding genes, one lncRNA, and four pseudogenes (OR 8.96; 95\% CI 5.4-14.9). Overall, 114 cases (7\%) and only 28 controls (0.7\%) had one of the three rare duplications. No case nor control had more than one of these three duplications.

Conclusions: Rare CNVs are a source of genetic variation that contribute to the genetic risk for comitant esotropia, which is likely polygenic. Future research into the functional consequences of these recurrent duplications may shed light on the pathophysiology of esotropia.

}, keywords = {Case-Control Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Esotropia, Female, Gene Duplication, Gene Frequency, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotyping Techniques, Humans, Infant, Male, Markov Chains, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Risk Factors}, issn = {1552-5783}, doi = {10.1167/iovs.61.10.22}, author = {Whitman, Mary C and Di Gioia, Silvio Alessandro and Chan, Wai-Man and Gelber, Alon and Pratt, Brandon M and Bell, Jessica L and Collins, Thomas E and Knowles, James A and Armoskus, Christopher and Pato, Michele and Pato, Carlos and Shaaban, Sherin and Staffieri, Sandra and MacKinnon, Sarah and Maconachie, Gail D E and Elder, James E and Traboulsi, Elias I and Gottlob, Irene and Mackey, David A and Hunter, David G and Engle, Elizabeth C} } @article {735, title = {Detailed genetic characteristics of an international large cohort of patients with Stargardt disease: ProgStar study report 8.}, journal = {Br J Ophthalmol}, volume = {103}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 03}, pages = {390-397}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To describe the genetic characteristics of the cohort enrolled in the international multicentre progression of Stargardt disease~1 (STGD1) studies (ProgStar) and to~determine geographic differences based on the allele frequency.

METHODS: 345 participants with a clinical diagnosis of STGD1 and harbouring at least one disease-causing ABCA4 variant were enrolled from 9 centres in the USA and Europe. All variants were reviewed and analysis was performed including allele frequency in public databases and pathogenicity predictions. Participants with multiple likely pathogenic variants were classified into four national subgroups (USA, UK, France, Germany), with subsequent comparison analysis of the allele frequency for each prevalent allele.

RESULTS: 211 likely pathogenic variants were identified in the total cohort, including missense (63\%), splice site alteration (18\%), stop (9\%) and others. 50 variants were novel. Exclusively missense variants were detected in 139 (50\%) of 279 patients with multiple pathogenic variants. The three most prevalent variants of these patients with multiple pathogenic variants were p.G1961E (15\%), p.G863A (7\%)~and~c.5461-10 T>C (5\%). Subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the four recruiting nations in the allele frequency of nine variants.

CONCLUSIONS: There is a large spectrum of ABCA4 sequence variants, including 50 novel variants, in a well-characterised cohort thereby further adding to the unique allelic heterogeneity in STGD1. Approximately half of the cohort harbours missense variants only, indicating a relatively mild phenotype of the ProgStar cohort. There are significant differences in allele frequencies between nations, although the three most prevalent variants are shared as frequent variants.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Age of Onset, Aged, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Child, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotyping Techniques, Geography, Humans, Internationality, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Polymerase Chain Reaction}, issn = {1468-2079}, doi = {10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312064}, author = {Fujinami, Kaoru and Strauss, Rupert W and Chiang, John Pei-Wen and Audo, Isabelle S and Bernstein, Paul S and Birch, David G and Bomotti, Samantha M and Cideciyan, Artur V and Ervin, Ann-Margret and Marino, Meghan J and Sahel, Jos{\'e}-Alain and Mohand-Said, Saddek and Sunness, Janet S and Traboulsi, Elias I and West, Sheila and Wojciechowski, Robert and Zrenner, Eberhart and Michaelides, Michel and Scholl, Hendrik P N} }