@article {790,
	title = {Bi-allelic GAD1 variants cause a neonatal onset syndromic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy.},
	journal = {Brain},
	volume = {143},
	year = {2020},
	month = {2020 05 01},
	pages = {1447-1461},
	abstract = {<p>Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies are a heterogeneous group of early-onset epilepsy syndromes dramatically impairing neurodevelopment. Modern genomic technologies have revealed a number of monogenic origins and opened the door to therapeutic hopes. Here we describe a new syndromic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy caused by bi-allelic loss-of-function variants in GAD1, as presented by 11 patients from six independent consanguineous families. Seizure onset occurred in the first 2 months of life in all patients. All 10 patients, from whom early disease history was available, presented with seizure onset in the first month of life, mainly consisting of epileptic spasms or myoclonic seizures. Early EEG showed suppression-burst or pattern of burst attenuation or hypsarrhythmia if only recorded in the post-neonatal period. Eight patients had joint contractures and/or pes equinovarus. Seven patients presented a cleft palate and two also had an omphalocele, reproducing the phenotype of the knockout Gad1-/- mouse model. Four patients died before 4 years of age. GAD1 encodes the glutamate decarboxylase enzyme GAD67, a critical actor of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) metabolism as it catalyses the decarboxylation of glutamic acid to form GABA. Our findings evoke a novel syndrome related to GAD67 deficiency, characterized by the unique association of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, cleft palate, joint contractures and/or omphalocele.</p>},
	keywords = {Abnormalities, Multiple, Epileptic Syndromes, Female, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mutation, Pedigree},
	issn = {1460-2156},
	doi = {10.1093/brain/awaa085},
	author = {Chatron, Nicolas and Becker, Felicitas and Morsy, Heba and Schmidts, Miriam and Hardies, Katia and Tuysuz, Beyhan and Roselli, Sandra and Najafi, Maryam and Alkaya, Dilek Uludag and Ashrafzadeh, Farah and Nabil, Amira and Omar, Tarek and Maroofian, Reza and Karimiani, Ehsan Ghayoor and Hussien, Haytham and Kok, Fernando and Ramos, Luiza and Gunes, Nilay and Bilguvar, Kaya and Labalme, Audrey and Alix, Eudeline and Sanlaville, Damien and de Bellescize, Julitta and Poulat, Anne-Lise and Moslemi, Ali-Reza and Lerche, Holger and May, Patrick and Lesca, Gaetan and Weckhuysen, Sarah and Tajsharghi, Homa}
}
@article {672,
	title = {The Genomics of Arthrogryposis, a Complex Trait: Candidate Genes and Further Evidence for Oligogenic Inheritance.},
	journal = {Am J Hum Genet},
	volume = {105},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019 Jul 03},
	pages = {132-150},
	abstract = {<p>Arthrogryposis is a clinical finding that is present either as a feature of a neuromuscular condition or as part of a systemic disease in over 400 Mendelian conditions. The underlying molecular etiology remains largely unknown because of genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. We applied exome sequencing (ES) in a cohort of 89 families with the clinical sign of arthrogryposis. Additional molecular techniques including array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) were performed on individuals who were found to have pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) and mosaicism, respectively. A molecular diagnosis was established in 65.2\% (58/89) of families. Eleven out of 58 families (19.0\%) showed evidence for potential involvement of pathogenic variation at more than one locus, probably driven by absence of heterozygosity (AOH) burden due to identity-by-descent (IBD). RYR3, MYOM2, ERGIC1, SPTBN4, and ABCA7 represent genes, identified in two or more families, for which mutations are probably causative for arthrogryposis. We also provide evidence for the involvement of CNVs in the etiology of arthrogryposis and for the idea that both mono-allelic and bi-allelic variants in the same gene cause either similar or distinct syndromes. We were able to identify the molecular etiology in nine out of 20 families who underwent reanalysis. In summary, our data from family-based ES further delineate the molecular etiology of arthrogryposis, yielded several candidate disease-associated genes, and provide evidence for mutational burden in a biological pathway or network. Our study also highlights the importance of reanalysis of individuals with unsolved diagnoses in conjunction with sequencing extended family members.</p>},
	issn = {1537-6605},
	doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.015},
	author = {Pehlivan, Davut and Bayram, Yavuz and Gunes, Nilay and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep and Shukla, Anju and Bierhals, Tatjana and Tabakci, Burcu and Sahin, Yavuz and Gezdirici, Alper and Fatih, Jawid M and Gulec, Elif Yilmaz and Yesil, G{\"o}zde and Punetha, Jaya and Ocak, Zeynep and Grochowski, Christopher M and Karaca, Ender and Albayrak, Hatice Mutlu and Radhakrishnan, Periyasamy and Erdem, Haktan Bagis and Sahin, Ibrahim and Yildirim, Timur and Bayhan, Ilhan A and Bursali, Aysegul and Elmas, Muhsin and Yuksel, Zafer and Ozdemir, Ozturk and Silan, Fatma and Yildiz, Onur and Yesilbas, Osman and Isikay, Sedat and Balta, Burhan and Gu, Shen and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Doddapaneni, Harsha and Hu, Jianhong and Muzny, Donna M and Boerwinkle, Eric and Gibbs, Richard A and Tsiakas, Konstantinos and Hempel, Maja and Girisha, Katta Mohan and Gul, Davut and Posey, Jennifer E and Elcioglu, Nursel H and Tuysuz, Beyhan and Lupski, James R}
}
