@article {767,
	title = {Recurrent De Novo NAHR Reciprocal Duplications in the ATAD3 Gene Cluster Cause a Neurogenetic Trait with Perturbed Cholesterol and Mitochondrial Metabolism.},
	journal = {Am J Hum Genet},
	volume = {106},
	year = {2020},
	month = {2020 02 06},
	pages = {272-279},
	abstract = {<p>Recent studies have identified both recessive and dominant forms of mitochondrial disease that result from ATAD3A variants. The recessive form includes subjects with biallelic deletions mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination. We report five unrelated neonates with a lethal metabolic disorder characterized by cardiomyopathy, corneal opacities, encephalopathy, hypotonia, and seizures in whom a monoallelic reciprocal duplication at the ATAD3 locus was identified. Analysis of the breakpoint junction fragment indicated that these 67 kb heterozygous duplications were likely mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination at regions of high sequence identity in ATAD3A exon 11 and ATAD3C exon 7. At the recombinant junction, the duplication allele produces a fusion gene derived from ATAD3A and ATAD3C, the protein product of which lacks key functional residues. Analysis of fibroblasts derived from two affected individuals shows that the fusion gene product is expressed and stable. These cells display perturbed cholesterol and mitochondrial DNA organization similar to that observed for individuals with severe ATAD3A deficiency. We hypothesize that the fusion protein acts through a dominant-negative mechanism to cause this fatal mitochondrial disorder. Our data delineate a molecular diagnosis for this disorder, extend the clinical spectrum associated with structural variation at the ATAD3 locus, and identify a third mutational mechanism for ATAD3 gene cluster variants. These results further affirm structural variant mutagenesis mechanisms in sporadic disease traits, emphasize the importance of copy number analysis in molecular genomic diagnosis, and highlight some of the challenges of detecting and interpreting clinically relevant rare gene rearrangements from next-generation sequencing data.</p>},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities, Brain Diseases, Cardiomyopathies, Cholesterol, Corneal Opacity, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gene Duplication, Gene Rearrangement, Homologous Recombination, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Membrane Proteins, Mitochondria, Mitochondrial Diseases, Mitochondrial Proteins, Muscle Hypotonia, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Seizures, Sequence Homology},
	issn = {1537-6605},
	doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.01.007},
	author = {Gunning, Adam C and Strucinska, Klaudia and Mu{\~n}oz Oreja, Mikel and Parrish, Andrew and Caswell, Richard and Stals, Karen L and Durigon, Romina and Durlacher-Betzer, Karina and Cunningham, Mitchell H and Grochowski, Christopher M and Baptista, Julia and Tysoe, Carolyn and Baple, Emma and Lahiri, Nayana and Homfray, Tessa and Scurr, Ingrid and Armstrong, Catherine and Dean, John and Fernandez Pelayo, Uxoa and Jones, Aleck W E and Taylor, Robert W and Misra, Vinod K and Yoon, Wan Hee and Wright, Caroline F and Lupski, James R and Spinazzola, Antonella and Harel, Tamar and Holt, Ian J and Ellard, Sian}
}
@article {50,
	title = {Germline or somatic GPR101 duplication leads to X-linked acrogigantism: a clinico-pathological and genetic study.},
	journal = {Acta Neuropathol Commun},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2016},
	month = {2016 06 01},
	pages = {56},
	abstract = {<p>Non-syndromic pituitary gigantism can result from AIP mutations or the recently identified Xq26.3 microduplication causing X-linked acrogigantism (XLAG). Within Xq26.3, GPR101 is believed to be the causative gene, and the c.924G > C (p.E308D) variant in this orphan G protein-coupled receptor has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of acromegaly.We studied 153 patients (58 females and 95 males) with pituitary gigantism. AIP mutation-negative cases were screened for GPR101 duplication through copy number variation droplet digital PCR and high-density aCGH. The genetic, clinical and histopathological features of XLAG patients were studied in detail. 395 peripheral blood and 193 pituitary tumor DNA samples from acromegaly patients were tested for GPR101 variants.We identified 12 patients (10 females and 2 males; 7.8~\%) with XLAG. In one subject, the duplicated region only contained GPR101, but not the other three genes in found to be duplicated in the previously reported patients, defining a new smallest region of overlap of duplications. While females presented with germline mutations, the two male patients harbored the mutation in a mosaic state. Nine patients had pituitary adenomas, while three had hyperplasia. The comparison of the features of XLAG, AIP-positive and GPR101\&AIP-negative patients revealed significant differences in sex distribution, age at onset, height, prolactin co-secretion and histological features. The pathological features of XLAG-related adenomas were remarkably similar. These tumors had a sinusoidal and lobular architecture. Sparsely and densely granulated somatotrophs were admixed with lactotrophs; follicle-like structures and calcifications were commonly observed. Patients with sporadic of familial~acromegaly did not have an increased prevalence of the c.924G > C (p.E308D) GPR101 variant compared to public databases.In conclusion, XLAG can result from germline or somatic duplication of GPR101. Duplication of GPR101 alone is sufficient for the development of XLAG, implicating it as the causative gene within the Xq26.3 region. The pathological features of XLAG-associated pituitary adenomas are typical and, together with the clinical phenotype, should prompt genetic testing.</p>},
	keywords = {Acromegaly, Adenoma, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Gene Duplication, Germ-Line Mutation, Gigantism, Humans, Infant, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Male, Pituitary Neoplasms, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult},
	issn = {2051-5960},
	doi = {10.1186/s40478-016-0328-1},
	author = {Iacovazzo, Donato and Caswell, Richard and Bunce, Benjamin and Jose, Sian and Yuan, Bo and Hern{\'a}ndez-Ram{\'\i}rez, Laura C and Kapur, Sonal and Caimari, Francisca and Evanson, Jane and Ferra{\`u}, Francesco and Dang, Mary N and Gabrovska, Plamena and Larkin, Sarah J and Ansorge, Olaf and Rodd, Celia and Vance, Mary L and Ram{\'\i}rez-Renteria, Claudia and Mercado, Mois{\'e}s and Goldstone, Anthony P and Buchfelder, Michael and Burren, Christine P and Gurlek, Alper and Dutta, Pinaki and Choong, Catherine S and Cheetham, Timothy and Trivellin, Giampaolo and Stratakis, Constantine A and Lopes, Maria-Beatriz and Grossman, Ashley B and Trouillas, Jacqueline and Lupski, James R and Ellard, Sian and Sampson, Julian R and Roncaroli, Federico and Korbonits, M{\'a}rta}
}
