@article {357, title = {Lessons learned from additional research analyses of unsolved clinical exome cases.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {9}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 03 21}, pages = {26}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Given the rarity of most single-gene Mendelian disorders, concerted efforts of data exchange between clinical and scientific communities are critical to optimize molecular diagnosis and novel disease gene discovery.

METHODS: We designed and implemented protocols for the study of cases for which a plausible molecular diagnosis was not achieved in a clinical genomics diagnostic laboratory (i.e. unsolved clinical exomes). Such cases were recruited to a research laboratory for further analyses, in order to potentially: (1) accelerate novel disease gene discovery; (2) increase the molecular diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing (WES); and (3) gain insight into the genetic mechanisms of disease. Pilot project data included 74 families, consisting mostly of parent-offspring trios. Analyses performed on a research basis employed both WES from additional family members and complementary bioinformatics approaches and protocols.

RESULTS: Analysis of all possible modes of Mendelian inheritance, focusing on both single nucleotide variants (SNV) and copy number variant (CNV) alleles, yielded a likely contributory variant in 36\% (27/74) of cases. If one includes candidate genes with variants identified within a single family, a potential contributory variant was identified in a total of ~51\% (38/74) of cases enrolled in this pilot study. The molecular diagnosis was achieved in 30/63 trios (47.6\%). Besides this, the analysis workflow yielded evidence for pathogenic variants in disease-associated genes in 4/6 singleton cases (66.6\%), 1/1 multiplex family involving three affected siblings, and 3/4 (75\%) quartet families. Both the analytical pipeline and the collaborative efforts between the diagnostic and research laboratories provided insights that allowed recent disease gene discoveries (PURA, TANGO2, EMC1, GNB5, ATAD3A, and MIPEP) and increased the number of novel genes, defined in this study as genes identified in more than one family (DHX30 and EBF3).

CONCLUSION: An efficient genomics pipeline in which clinical sequencing in a diagnostic laboratory is followed by the detailed reanalysis of unsolved cases in a research environment, supplemented with WES data from additional family members, and subject to adjuvant bioinformatics analyses including relaxed variant filtering parameters in informatics pipelines, can enhance the molecular diagnostic yield and provide mechanistic insights into Mendelian disorders. Implementing these approaches requires collaborative clinical molecular diagnostic and research efforts.

}, keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities, Computational Biology, DNA Copy Number Variations, DNA-Binding Proteins, Exome, Female, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, GTP-Binding Protein beta Subunits, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Metalloendopeptidases, Mitochondrial Proteins, Pilot Projects, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-017-0412-6}, author = {Eldomery, Mohammad K and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Harel, Tamar and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Gambin, Tomasz and Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and K{\"u}ry, S{\'e}bastien and Mercier, Sandra and Lessel, Davor and Denecke, Jonas and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Penney, Samantha and Liu, Pengfei and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Schaaf, Christian P and Wangler, Michael F and Bacino, Carlos A and Lewis, Richard Alan and Potocki, Lorraine and Graham, Brett H and Belmont, John W and Scaglia, Fernando and Orange, Jordan S and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Chiang, Theodore and Doddapaneni, Harsha and Hu, Jianhong and Muzny, Donna M and Xia, Fan and Beaudet, Arthur L and Boerwinkle, Eric and Eng, Christine M and Plon, Sharon E and Sutton, V Reid and Gibbs, Richard A and Posey, Jennifer E and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R} } @article {27, title = {Primary immunodeficiency diseases: Genomic approaches delineate heterogeneous Mendelian disorders.}, journal = {J Allergy Clin Immunol}, volume = {139}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jan}, pages = {232-245}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders thus far associated with mutations in more than 300 genes. The clinical phenotypes derived from distinct genotypes can overlap. Genetic etiology can be a prognostic indicator of disease severity and can influence treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the ability of whole-exome screening methods to detect disease-causing variants in patients with PIDDs.

METHODS: Patients with PIDDs from 278 families from 22 countries were investigated by using whole-exome sequencing. Computational copy number variant (CNV) prediction pipelines and an exome-tiling chromosomal microarray were also applied to identify intragenic CNVs. Analytic approaches initially focused on 475 known or candidate PIDD genes but were nonexclusive and further tailored based on clinical data, family history, and immunophenotyping.

RESULTS: A likely molecular diagnosis was achieved in 110 (40\%) unrelated probands. Clinical diagnosis was revised in about half (60/110) and management was directly altered in nearly a quarter (26/110) of families based on molecular findings. Twelve PIDD-causing CNVs were detected, including 7 smaller than 30~Kb that would not have been detected with conventional diagnostic CNV arrays.

CONCLUSION: This high-throughput genomic approach enabled detection of disease-related variants in unexpected genes; permitted detection of low-grade constitutional, somatic, and revertant mosaicism; and provided evidence of a mutational burden in mixed PIDD immunophenotypes.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult}, issn = {1097-6825}, doi = {10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.042}, author = {Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and Sorte, Hanne S{\o}rmo and Samarakoon, Pubudu and Gambin, Tomasz and Chinn, Ivan K and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Erichsen, Hans Christian and Forbes, Lisa R and Gu, Shen and Yuan, Bo and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Muzny, Donna M and R{\o}dningen, Olaug Kristin and Sheng, Ying and Nicholas, Sarah K and Noroski, Lenora M and Seeborg, Filiz O and Davis, Carla M and Canter, Debra L and Mace, Emily M and Vece, Timothy J and Allen, Carl E and Abhyankar, Harshal A and Boone, Philip M and Beck, Christine R and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Fevang, B{\o}rre and Aukrust, P{\r a}l and Tj{\o}nnfjord, Geir E and Gedde-Dahl, Tobias and Hjorth-Hansen, Henrik and Dybedal, Ingunn and Nord{\o}y, Ingvild and J{\o}rgensen, Silje F and Abrahamsen, Tore G and {\O}verland, Torstein and Bechensteen, Anne Grete and Skogen, Vegard and Osnes, Liv T N and Kulseth, Mari Ann and Prescott, Trine E and Rustad, Cecilie F and Heimdal, Ketil R and Belmont, John W and Rider, Nicholas L and Chinen, Javier and Cao, Tram N and Smith, Eric A and Caldirola, Maria Soledad and Bezrodnik, Liliana and Lugo Reyes, Saul Oswaldo and Espinosa Rosales, Francisco J and Guerrero-Cursaru, Nina Denisse and Pedroza, Luis Alberto and Poli, Cecilia M and Franco, Jose L and Trujillo Vargas, Claudia M and Aldave Becerra, Juan Carlos and Wright, Nicola and Issekutz, Thomas B and Issekutz, Andrew C and Abbott, Jordan and Caldwell, Jason W and Bayer, Diana K and Chan, Alice Y and Aiuti, Alessandro and Cancrini, Caterina and Holmberg, Eva and West, Christina and Burstedt, Magnus and Karaca, Ender and Yesil, G{\"o}zde and Artac, Hasibe and Bayram, Yavuz and Atik, Mehmed Musa and Eldomery, Mohammad K and Ehlayel, Mohammad S and Jolles, Stephen and Flat{\o}, Berit and Bertuch, Alison A and Hanson, I Celine and Zhang, Victor W and Wong, Lee-Jun and Hu, Jianhong and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Yang, Yaping and Eng, Christine M and Boerwinkle, Eric and Gibbs, Richard A and Shearer, William T and Lyle, Robert and Orange, Jordan S and Lupski, James R} } @article {217, title = {Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {312}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Nov 12}, pages = {1870-9}, abstract = {

IMPORTANCE: Clinical whole-exome sequencing is increasingly used for diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected genetic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To perform clinical whole-exome sequencing and report (1) the rate of molecular diagnosis among phenotypic groups, (2) the spectrum of genetic alterations contributing to disease, and (3) the prevalence of medically actionable incidental findings such as FBN1 mutations causing Marfan syndrome.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Observational study of 2000 consecutive patients with clinical whole-exome sequencing analyzed between June 2012 and August 2014. Whole-exome sequencing tests were performed at a clinical genetics laboratory in the United States. Results were reported by clinical molecular geneticists certified by the American Board of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Tests were ordered by the patient{\textquoteright}s physician. The patients were primarily pediatric (1756 [88\%]; mean age, 6 years; 888 females [44\%], 1101 males [55\%], and 11 fetuses [1\% gender unknown]), demonstrating diverse clinical manifestations most often including nervous system dysfunction such as developmental delay.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Whole-exome sequencing diagnosis rate overall and by phenotypic category, mode of inheritance, spectrum of genetic events, and reporting of incidental findings.

RESULTS: A molecular diagnosis was reported for 504 patients (25.2\%) with 58\% of the diagnostic mutations not previously reported. Molecular diagnosis rates for each phenotypic category were 143/526 (27.2\%; 95\% CI, 23.5\%-31.2\%) for the neurological group, 282/1147 (24.6\%; 95\% CI, 22.1\%-27.2\%) for the neurological plus other organ systems group, 30/83 (36.1\%; 95\% CI, 26.1\%-47.5\%) for the specific neurological group, and 49/244 (20.1\%; 95\% CI, 15.6\%-25.8\%) for the nonneurological group. The Mendelian disease patterns of the 527 molecular diagnoses included 280 (53.1\%) autosomal dominant, 181 (34.3\%) autosomal recessive (including 5 with uniparental disomy), 65 (12.3\%) X-linked, and 1 (0.2\%) mitochondrial. Of 504 patients with a molecular diagnosis, 23 (4.6\%) had blended phenotypes resulting from 2 single gene defects. About 30\% of the positive cases harbored mutations in disease genes reported since 2011. There were 95 medically actionable incidental findings in genes unrelated to the phenotype but with immediate implications for management in 92 patients (4.6\%), including 59 patients (3\%) with mutations in genes recommended for reporting by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Whole-exome sequencing provided a potential molecular diagnosis for 25\% of a large cohort of patients referred for evaluation of suspected genetic conditions, including detection of rare genetic events and new mutations contributing to disease. The yield of whole-exome sequencing may offer advantages over traditional molecular diagnostic approaches in certain patients.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Exome, Female, Fetus, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Testing, Genomics, Humans, Incidental Findings, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Mutation, Phenotype, Referral and Consultation, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2014.14601}, author = {Yang, Yaping and Muzny, Donna M and Xia, Fan and Niu, Zhiyv and Person, Richard and Ding, Yan and Ward, Patricia and Braxton, Alicia and Wang, Min and Buhay, Christian and Veeraraghavan, Narayanan and Hawes, Alicia and Chiang, Theodore and Leduc, Magalie and Beuten, Joke and Zhang, Jing and He, Weimin and Scull, Jennifer and Willis, Alecia and Landsverk, Megan and Craigen, William J and Bekheirnia, Mir Reza and Stray-Pedersen, Asbjorg and Liu, Pengfei and Wen, Shu and Alcaraz, Wendy and Cui, Hong and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Reid, Jeffrey and Bainbridge, Matthew and Patel, Ankita and Boerwinkle, Eric and Beaudet, Arthur L and Lupski, James R and Plon, Sharon E and Gibbs, Richard A and Eng, Christine M} }