@article {789, title = {Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing in early-onset scoliosis (EOS).}, journal = {J Med Genet}, volume = {58}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Jan}, pages = {41-47}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS), defined by an onset age of scoliosis less than 10 years, conveys significant health risk to affected children. Identification of the molecular aetiology underlying patients with EOS could provide valuable information for both clinical management and prenatal screening.

METHODS: In this study, we consecutively recruited a cohort of 447 Chinese patients with operative EOS. We performed exome sequencing (ES) screening on these individuals and their available family members (totaling 670 subjects). Another cohort of 13 patients with idiopathic early-onset scoliosis (IEOS) from the USA who underwent ES was also recruited.

RESULTS: After ES data processing and variant interpretation, we detected molecular diagnostic variants in 92 out of 447 (20.6\%) Chinese patients with EOS, including 8 patients with molecular confirmation of their clinical diagnosis and 84 patients with molecular diagnoses of previously unrecognised diseases underlying scoliosis. One out of 13 patients with IEOS from the US cohort was molecularly diagnosed. The age at presentation, the number of organ systems involved and the Cobb angle were the three top features predictive of a molecular diagnosis.

CONCLUSION: ES enabled the molecular diagnosis/classification of patients with EOS. Specific clinical features/feature pairs are able to indicate the likelihood of gaining a molecular diagnosis through ES.

}, issn = {1468-6244}, doi = {10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106823}, author = {Zhao, Sen and Zhang, Yuanqiang and Chen, Weisheng and Li, Weiyu and Wang, Shengru and Wang, Lianlei and Zhao, Yanxue and Lin, Mao and Ye, Yongyu and Lin, Jiachen and Zheng, Yu and Liu, Jiaqi and Zhao, Hengqiang and Yan, Zihui and Yang, Yongxin and Huang, Yingzhao and Lin, Guanfeng and Chen, Zefu and Zhang, Zhen and Liu, Sen and Jin, Lichao and Wang, Zhaoyang and Chen, Jingdan and Niu, Yuchen and Li, Xiaoxin and Wu, Yong and Wang, Yipeng and Du, Renqian and Gao, Na and Zhao, Hong and Yang, Ying and Liu, Ying and Tian, Ye and Li, Wenli and Zhao, Yu and Liu, Jia and Yu, Bin and Zhang, Na and Yu, Keyi and Yang, Xu and Li, Shugang and Xu, Yuan and Hu, Jianhua and Liu, Zhe and Shen, Jianxiong and Zhang, Shuyang and Su, Jianzhong and Khanshour, Anas M and Kidane, Yared H and Ramo, Brandon and Rios, Jonathan J and Liu, Pengfei and Sutton, V Reid and Posey, Jennifer E and Wu, Zhihong and Qiu, Guixing and Wise, Carol A and Zhang, Feng and Lupski, James R and Zhang, Jianguo and Wu, Nan} } @article {570, title = {TBX6 compound inheritance leads to congenital vertebral malformations in humans and mice.}, journal = {Hum Mol Genet}, volume = {28}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 02 15}, pages = {539-547}, abstract = {

Congenital vertebral malformations (CVMs) are associated with human TBX6 compound inheritance that combines a rare null allele and a common hypomorphic allele at the TBX6 locus. Our previous in vitro evidence suggested that this compound inheritance resulted in a TBX6 gene dosage of less than haploinsufficiency (i.e. <50\%) as a potential mechanism of TBX6-associated CVMs. To further investigate this pathogenetic model, we ascertained and collected 108 Chinese CVM cases and found that 10 (9.3\%) of them carried TBX6 null mutations in combination with common hypomorphic variants at the second TBX6 allele. For in vivo functional verification and genetic analysis of TBX6 compound inheritance, we generated both null and hypomorphic mutations in mouse Tbx6 using the CRISPR-Cas9 method. These Tbx6 mutants are not identical to the patient variants at the DNA sequence level, but instead functionally mimic disease-associated TBX6 variants. Intriguingly, as anticipated by the compound inheritance model, a high penetrance of CVM phenotype was only observed in the mice with combined null and hypomorphic alleles of Tbx6. These findings are consistent with our experimental observations in humans and supported the dosage effect of TBX6 in CVM etiology. In conclusion, our findings in the newly collected human CVM subjects and Tbx6 mouse models consistently support the contention that TBX6 compound inheritance causes CVMs, potentially via a gene dosage-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, mouse Tbx6 mutants mimicking human CVM-associated variants will be useful models for further mechanistic investigations of CVM pathogenesis in the cases associated with TBX6.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Alleles, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Congenital Abnormalities, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Haploinsufficiency, Humans, Infant, Male, Mice, Mutation, Phenotype, Scoliosis, Spine, T-Box Domain Proteins}, issn = {1460-2083}, doi = {10.1093/hmg/ddy358}, author = {Yang, Nan and Wu, Nan and Zhang, Ling and Zhao, Yanxue and Liu, Jiaqi and Liang, Xiangyu and Ren, Xiaojun and Li, Weiyu and Chen, Weisheng and Dong, Shuangshuang and Zhao, Sen and Lin, Jiachen and Xiang, Hang and Xue, Huadan and Chen, Lu and Sun, Hao and Zhang, Jianguo and Shi, Jiangang and Zhang, Shuyang and Lu, Daru and Wu, Xiaohui and Jin, Li and Ding, Jiandong and Qiu, Guixing and Wu, Zhihong and Lupski, James R and Zhang, Feng} } @article {682, title = {TBX6-associated congenital scoliosis (TACS) as a clinically distinguishable subtype of congenital scoliosis: further evidence supporting the compound inheritance and TBX6 gene dosage model.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {21}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 07}, pages = {1548-1558}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: To characterize clinically measurable endophenotypes, implicating the TBX6 compound inheritance model.

METHODS: Patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) from China(N = 345, cohort 1), Japan (N = 142, cohort 2), and the United States (N = 10, cohort 3) were studied. Clinically measurable endophenotypes were compared according to the TBX6 genotypes. A mouse model for Tbx6 compound inheritance (N = 52) was investigated by micro computed tomography (micro-CT). A clinical diagnostic algorithm (TACScore) was developed to assist in clinical recognition of TBX6-associated CS (TACS).

RESULTS: In cohort 1, TACS patients (N = 33) were significantly younger at onset than the remaining CS patients (P = 0.02), presented with one or more hemivertebrae/butterfly vertebrae (P = 4.9 {\texttimes} 10), and exhibited vertebral malformations involving the lower part of the spine (T8-S5, P = 4.4 {\texttimes} 10); observations were confirmed in two replication cohorts. Simple rib anomalies were prevalent in TACS patients (P = 3.1 {\texttimes} 10), while intraspinal anomalies were uncommon (P = 7.0 {\texttimes} 10). A clinically usable TACScore was developed with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9 (P = 1.6 {\texttimes} 10). A Tbx6 mouse model supported that a~gene dosage effect underlies the TACS phenotype.

CONCLUSION: TACS is a clinically distinguishable entity with consistent clinically measurable endophenotypes. The type and distribution of vertebral column abnormalities in TBX6/Tbx6 compound inheritance implicate subtle perturbations in gene dosage as a cause of spine developmental birth defects responsible for about 10\% of CS.

}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/s41436-018-0377-x}, author = {Liu, Jiaqi and Wu, Nan and Yang, Nan and Takeda, Kazuki and Chen, Weisheng and Li, Weiyu and Du, Renqian and Liu, Sen and Zhou, Yangzhong and Zhang, Ling and Liu, Zhenlei and Zuo, Yuzhi and Zhao, Sen and Blank, Robert and Pehlivan, Davut and Dong, Shuangshuang and Zhang, Jianguo and Shen, Jianxiong and Si, Nuo and Wang, Yipeng and Liu, Gang and Li, Shugang and Zhao, Yanxue and Zhao, Hong and Chen, Yixin and Zhao, Yu and Song, Xiaofei and Hu, Jianhua and Lin, Mao and Tian, Ye and Yuan, Bo and Yu, Keyi and Niu, Yuchen and Yu, Bin and Li, Xiaoxin and Chen, Jia and Yan, Zihui and Zhu, Qiankun and Meng, Xiaolu and Chen, Xiaoli and Su, Jianzhong and Zhao, Xiuli and Wang, Xiaoyue and Ming, Yue and Li, Xiao and Raggio, Cathleen L and Zhang, Baozhong and Weng, Xisheng and Zhang, Shuyang and Zhang, Xue and Watanabe, Kota and Matsumoto, Morio and Jin, Li and Shen, Yiping and Sobreira, Nara L and Posey, Jennifer E and Giampietro, Philip F and Valle, David and Liu, Pengfei and Wu, Zhihong and Ikegawa, Shiro and Lupski, James R and Zhang, Feng and Qiu, Guixing} }