@article {923,
	title = {Alternative genomic diagnoses for individuals with a clinical diagnosis of Dubowitz syndrome.},
	journal = {Am J Med Genet A},
	volume = {185},
	year = {2021},
	month = {2021 01},
	pages = {119-133},
	abstract = {<p>Dubowitz syndrome (DubS) is considered a recognizable syndrome characterized by a distinctive facial appearance and deficits in growth and development. There have been over 200 individuals reported with Dubowitz or a "Dubowitz-like" condition, although no single gene has been implicated as responsible for its cause. We have performed exome (ES) or genome sequencing (GS) for 31 individuals clinically diagnosed with DubS. After genome-wide sequencing, rare variant filtering and computational and Mendelian genomic analyses, a presumptive molecular diagnosis was made in 13/27 (48\%) families. The molecular diagnoses included biallelic variants in SKIV2L, SLC35C1, BRCA1, NSUN2; de novo variants in ARID1B, ARID1A, CREBBP, POGZ, TAF1, HDAC8, and copy-number variation at1p36.11(ARID1A), 8q22.2(VPS13B), Xp22, and Xq13(HDAC8). Variants of unknown significance in known disease genes, and also in genes of uncertain significance, were observed in 7/27 (26\%) additional families. Only one gene, HDAC8, could explain the phenotype in more than one family (N = 2). All but two of the genomic diagnoses were for genes discovered, or for conditions recognized, since the introduction of next-generation sequencing. Overall, the DubS-like clinical phenotype is associated with extensive locus heterogeneity and the molecular diagnoses made are for emerging clinical conditions sharing characteristic features that overlap the DubS phenotype.</p>},
	issn = {1552-4833},
	doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.61926},
	author = {Dyment, David A and O{\textquoteright}Donnell-Luria, Anne and Agrawal, Pankaj B and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep and Aleck, Kyrieckos A and Antaki, Danny and Al Sharhan, Hind and Au, Ping-Yee B and Aydin, Hatip and Beggs, Alan H and Bilguvar, Kaya and Boerwinkle, Eric and Brand, Harrison and Brownstein, Catherine A and Buyske, Steve and Chodirker, Bernard and Choi, Jungmin and Chudley, Albert E and Clericuzio, Carol L and Cox, Gerald F and Curry, Cynthia and de Boer, Elke and de Vries, Bert B A and Dunn, Kathryn and Dutmer, Cullen M and England, Eleina M and Fahrner, Jill A and Geckinli, Bilgen B and Genetti, Casie A and Gezdirici, Alper and Gibson, William T and Gleeson, Joseph G and Greenberg, Cheryl R and Hall, April and Hamosh, Ada and Hartley, Taila and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Karaca, Ender and Kernohan, Kristin and Lauzon, Julie L and Lewis, M E Suzanne and Lowry, R Brian and L{\'o}pez-Gir{\'a}ldez, Francesc and Matise, Tara C and McEvoy-Venneri, Jennifer and McInnes, Brenda and Mhanni, Aziz and Garcia Minaur, Sixto and Moilanen, Jukka and Nguyen, An and Nowaczyk, Malgorzata J M and Posey, Jennifer E and {\~O}unap, Katrin and Pehlivan, Davut and Pajusalu, Sander and Penney, Lynette S and Poterba, Timothy and Prontera, Paolo and Doriqui, Maria Juliana Rodovalho and Sawyer, Sarah L and Sobreira, Nara and Stanley, Valentina and Torun, Deniz and Wargowski, David and Witmer, P Dane and Wong, Isaac and Xing, Jinchuan and Zaki, MAH S and Zhang, Yeting and Boycott, Kym M and Bamshad, Michael J and Nickerson, Deborah A and Blue, Elizabeth E and Innes, A Micheil}
}
@article {550,
	title = {De Novo Sequence and Copy Number Variants Are Strongly Associated with Tourette Disorder and Implicate Cell Polarity in Pathogenesis.},
	journal = {Cell Rep},
	volume = {24},
	year = {2018},
	month = {2018 Sep 25},
	pages = {3441-3454.e12},
	abstract = {<p>We previously established the contribution of de novo damaging sequence variants to Tourette disorder (TD) through whole-exome sequencing of 511 trios. Here, we sequence an additional 291 TD trios and analyze the combined set of 802 trios. We observe an overrepresentation of de novo damaging variants in simplex, but not multiplex, families; we identify a high-confidence TD risk gene, CELSR3 (cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 3); we find that the genes mutated in TD patients are enriched for those related to cell polarity, suggesting a common pathway underlying pathobiology; and we confirm a statistically significant excess of de novo copy number variants in TD. Finally, we identify significant overlap of de novo sequence variants between TD and obsessive-compulsive disorder and de novo copy number variants between TD and autism spectrum disorder, consistent with shared genetic risk.</p>},
	issn = {2211-1247},
	doi = {10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.082},
	author = {Wang, Sheng and Mandell, Jeffrey D and Kumar, Yogesh and Sun, Nawei and Morris, Montana T and Arbelaez, Juan and Nasello, Cara and Dong, Shan and Duhn, Clif and Zhao, Xin and Yang, Zhiyu and Padmanabhuni, Shanmukha S and Yu, Dongmei and King, Robert A and Dietrich, Andrea and Khalifa, Najah and Dahl, Niklas and Huang, Alden Y and Neale, Benjamin M and Coppola, Giovanni and Mathews, Carol A and Scharf, Jeremiah M and Fernandez, Thomas V and Buxbaum, Joseph D and De Rubeis, Silvia and Grice, Dorothy E and Xing, Jinchuan and Heiman, Gary A and Tischfield, Jay A and Paschou, Peristera and Willsey, A Jeremy and State, Matthew W}
}
