@article {782, title = {CNVs cause autosomal recessive genetic diseases with or without involvement of SNV/indels.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {22}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {1633-1641}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Improved resolution of molecular diagnostic technologies enabled detection of smaller sized exonic level copy-number variants (CNVs). The contribution of CNVs to autosomal recessive (AR) conditions may be better recognized using a large clinical cohort.

METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the CNVs{\textquoteright} contribution to AR conditions in cases subjected to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA, N = ~70,000) and/or clinical exome sequencing (ES, N = ~12,000) at Baylor Genetics; most had pediatric onset neurodevelopmental disorders.

RESULTS: CNVs contributed to biallelic variations in 87 cases, including 81 singletons and three affected sibling pairs. Seventy cases had CNVs affecting both alleles, and 17 had a CNV and a single-nucleotide variant (SNV)/indel in trans. In total, 94.3\% of AR-CNVs affected one gene; among these 41.4\% were single-exon and 35.0\% were multiexon partial-gene events. Sixty-nine percent of homozygous AR-CNVs were embedded in homozygous genomic intervals. Five cases had large deletions unmasking an SNV/indel on the intact allele for a recessive condition, resulting in multiple molecular diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS: AR-CNVs are often smaller in size, transmitted through generations, and underrecognized due to limitations in clinical CNV detection methods. Our findings from a large clinical cohort emphasized integrated CNV and SNV/indel analyses for precise clinical and molecular diagnosis especially in the context of genomic disorders.

}, keywords = {Child, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exons, Humans, INDEL Mutation, Retrospective Studies, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/s41436-020-0864-8}, author = {Yuan, Bo and Wang, Lei and Liu, Pengfei and Shaw, Chad and Dai, Hongzheng and Cooper, Lance and Zhu, Wenmiao and Anderson, Stephanie A and Meng, Linyan and Wang, Xia and Wang, Yue and Xia, Fan and Xiao, Rui and Braxton, Alicia and Peacock, Sandra and Schmitt, Eric and Ward, Patricia A and Vetrini, Francesco and He, Weimin and Chiang, Theodore and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Breman, Amy M and Smith, Janice and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bacino, Carlos A and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R and Bi, Weimin} } @article {905, title = {Dominant-negative mutations in human IL6ST underlie hyper-IgE syndrome.}, journal = {J Exp Med}, volume = {217}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 06 01}, abstract = {

Autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome (AD-HIES) is typically caused by dominant-negative (DN) STAT3 mutations. Patients suffer from cold staphylococcal lesions and mucocutaneous candidiasis, severe allergy, and skeletal abnormalities. We report 12 patients from 8 unrelated kindreds with AD-HIES due to DN IL6ST mutations. We identified seven different truncating mutations, one of which was recurrent. The mutant alleles encode GP130 receptors bearing the transmembrane domain but lacking both the recycling motif and all four STAT3-recruiting tyrosine residues. Upon overexpression, the mutant proteins accumulate at the cell surface and are loss of function and DN for cellular responses to IL-6, IL-11, LIF, and OSM. Moreover, the patients{\textquoteright} heterozygous leukocytes and fibroblasts respond poorly to IL-6 and IL-11. Consistently, patients with STAT3 and IL6ST mutations display infectious and allergic manifestations of IL-6R deficiency, and some of the skeletal abnormalities of IL-11R deficiency. DN STAT3 and IL6ST mutations thus appear to underlie clinical phenocopies through impairment of the IL-6 and IL-11 response pathways.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Alleles, C-Reactive Protein, Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Child, Cytokine Receptor gp130, Cytokines, Female, Fibroblasts, Genes, Dominant, Genetics, Population, HEK293 Cells, Humans, Job Syndrome, Kinetics, Loss of Function Mutation, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Mutation, Pedigree, Phenotype, Th2 Cells, Up-Regulation, Young Adult}, issn = {1540-9538}, doi = {10.1084/jem.20191804}, author = {B{\'e}ziat, Vivien and Tavernier, Simon J and Chen, Yin-Huai and Ma, Cindy S and Materna, Marie and Laurence, Arian and Staal, Jens and Aschenbrenner, Dominik and Roels, Lisa and Worley, Lisa and Claes, Kathleen and Gartner, Lisa and Kohn, Lisa A and De Bruyne, Marieke and Schmitz-Abe, Klaus and Charbonnier, Louis-Marie and Keles, Sevgi and Nammour, Justine and Vladikine, Natasha and Maglorius Renkilaraj, Majistor Raj Luxman and Seeleuthner, Yoann and Migaud, M{\'e}lanie and Rosain, J{\'e}r{\'e}mie and Jeljeli, Mohamed and Boisson, Bertrand and Van Braeckel, Eva and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Dai, Hongzheng and Burrage, Lindsay C and Murdock, David R and Lambrecht, Bart N and Avettand-Fenoel, V{\'e}ronique and Vogel, Tiphanie P and Esther, Charles R and Haskologlu, Sule and Dogu, Figen and Ciznar, Peter and Boutboul, David and Ouach{\'e}e-Chardin, Marie and Amourette, Jean and Lebras, Marie-No{\"e}lle and Gauvain, Cl{\'e}ment and Tcherakian, Colas and Ikinciogullari, Aydan and Beyaert, Rudi and Abel, Laurent and Milner, Joshua D and Grimbacher, Bodo and Couderc, Louis-Jean and Butte, Manish J and Freeman, Alexandra F and Catherinot, Emilie and Fieschi, Claire and Chatila, Talal A and Tangye, Stuart G and Uhlig, Holm H and Haerynck, Filomeen and Casanova, Jean-Laurent and Puel, Anne} } @article {972, title = {Genetic Burden Contributing to Extremely Low or High Bone Mineral Density in a Senior Male Population From the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS).}, journal = {JBMR Plus}, volume = {4}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Mar}, pages = {e10335}, abstract = {

Worldwide, one in five men aged over 50 years will experience osteoporosis or a clinical bone fracture, with a greater fracture-related mortality rate than women. However, the genetic etiology of osteoporosis in men is still poorly understood. We aimed to identify the genetic variants and candidate genes associated with extremely low or high BMD for a better understanding of the biology underlying low bone density that may point to potential therapeutic targets for increasing bone mass. Subjects from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) cohort were evaluated by age and BMI-adjusted total hip BMD. Those with BMD values 3 SDs away from the mean were selected and the remaining individuals whose adjusted BMD ranked at the highest or lowest 100 were included. Men with the lowest adjusted BMD ( = 98) and highest adjusted BMD ( = 110) were chosen for exome sequencing. Controls ( = 82) were men of Northern and Western European descent from the US Utah population of the 1000 Genomes Project. Fisher{\textquoteright}s exact test was performed to compare low- or high-BMD subjects with controls for single-gene associations. Additionally, sets of candidate genes causative of heritable disorders of connective tissue, including osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), were grouped for multigene and mutation burden analyses. No single-gene associations with rare variants were found for either the low BMD group (33 genes) or high BMD group (18 genes). In the group of OI genes, we detected a significant threefold increased accumulation of rare variants in low-BMD subjects compared with controls ( = 0.009). Additionally, genes associated with EDS had a twofold increased frequency in low-BMD subjects compared with controls ( = 0.03). These findings reveal a rare variant burden in OI and EDS disease genes at low BMD, which suggests a potential gene-panel approach to screen for multivariant associations in larger cohorts. {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

}, issn = {2473-4039}, doi = {10.1002/jbm4.10335}, author = {Chen, Shan and Jain, Mahim and Jhangiani, Shalini and Akdemir, Zeynep C and Campeau, Philippe M and Klein, Robert F and Nielson, Carrie and Dai, Hongzheng and Muzny, Donna M and Boerwinkle, Eric and Gibbs, Richard A and Orwoll, Eric S and Lupski, James R and Posey, Jennifer E and Lee, Brendan} } @article {663, title = {Copy number variant and runs of homozygosity detection by microarrays enabled more precise molecular diagnoses in 11,020 clinical exome cases.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {11}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 05 17}, pages = {30}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Exome sequencing (ES) has been successfully applied in clinical detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small indels. However, identification of copy number variants (CNVs) using ES data remains challenging. The purpose of this study is to understand the contribution of CNVs and copy neutral runs of homozygosity (ROH) in molecular diagnosis of patients referred for ES.

METHODS: In a cohort of 11,020 consecutive ES patients, an Illumina SNP array analysis interrogating mostly coding SNPs was performed as a quality control (QC) measurement and for CNV/ROH detection. Among these patients, clinical chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed at Baylor Genetics (BG) on 3229 patients, either before, concurrently, or after ES. We retrospectively analyzed the findings from CMA and the QC array.

RESULTS: The QC array can detect ~ 70\% of pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (PCNVs) detectable by CMA. Out of the 11,020 ES cases, the QC array identified PCNVs in 327 patients and uniparental disomy (UPD) disorder-related ROH in 10 patients. The overall PCNV/UPD detection rate was 5.9\% in the 3229 ES patients who also had CMA at BG; PCNV/UPD detection rate was higher in concurrent ES and CMA than in ES with prior CMA (7.2\% vs 4.6\%). The PCNVs/UPD contributed to the molecular diagnoses in 17.4\%~(189/1089) of molecularly diagnosed ES cases with CMA and~were estimated to contribute in 10.6\% of all molecularly diagnosed ES cases. Dual diagnoses with both PCNVs and SNVs were detected in 38 patients. PCNVs affecting single recessive disorder genes in a compound heterozygous state with SNVs were detected in 4 patients, and homozygous deletions~(mostly exonic deletions) were detected in 17 patients. A higher PCNV detection rate was observed for patients with syndromic phenotypes and/or cardiovascular abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical genomics study demonstrates that detection of PCNV/UPD through the QC array or CMA increases ES diagnostic rate, provides more precise molecular diagnosis for dominant as well as recessive traits, and enables more complete genetic diagnoses in patients with dual or multiple molecular diagnoses. Concurrent ES and CMA using an array with exonic coverage for disease genes enables most effective detection of both CNVs and SNVs and therefore is recommended especially in time-sensitive clinical situations.

}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-019-0639-5}, author = {Dharmadhikari, Avinash V and Ghosh, Rajarshi and Yuan, Bo and Liu, Pengfei and Dai, Hongzheng and Al Masri, Sami and Scull, Jennifer and Posey, Jennifer E and Jiang, Allen H and He, Weimin and Vetrini, Francesco and Braxton, Alicia A and Ward, Patricia and Chiang, Theodore and Qu, Chunjing and Gu, Shen and Shaw, Chad A and Smith, Janice L and Lalani, Seema and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Cheung, Sau-Wai and Bacino, Carlos A and Patel, Ankita and Breman, Amy M and Wang, Xia and Meng, Linyan and Xiao, Rui and Xia, Fan and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Eng, Christine M and Lupski, James R and Yang, Yaping and Bi, Weimin} } @article {673, title = {Reanalysis of Clinical Exome Sequencing Data.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {380}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 06 20}, pages = {2478-2480}, keywords = {Exome, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Testing, Humans, Mutation, Phenotype, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMc1812033}, author = {Liu, Pengfei and Meng, Linyan and Normand, Elizabeth A and Xia, Fan and Song, Xiaofei and Ghazi, Andrew and Rosenfeld, Jill and Magoulas, Pilar L and Braxton, Alicia and Ward, Patricia and Dai, Hongzheng and Yuan, Bo and Bi, Weimin and Xiao, Rui and Wang, Xia and Chiang, Theodore and Vetrini, Francesco and He, Weimin and Cheng, Hanyin and Dong, Jie and Gijavanekar, Charul and Benke, Paul J and Bernstein, Jonathan A and Eble, Tanya and Eroglu, Yasemen and Erwin, Deanna and Escobar, Luis and Gibson, James B and Gripp, Karen and Kleppe, Soledad and Koenig, Mary K and Lewis, Andrea M and Natowicz, Marvin and Mancias, Pedro and Minor, LaKeesha and Scaglia, Fernando and Schaaf, Christian P and Streff, Haley and Vernon, Hilary and Uhles, Crescenda L and Zackai, Elaine H and Wu, Nan and Sutton, V Reid and Beaudet, Arthur L and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Posey, Jennifer E and Lalani, Seema and Shaw, Chad and Eng, Christine M and Lupski, James R and Yang, Yaping} } @article {540, title = {Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management.}, journal = {JAMA Pediatr}, volume = {171}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 12 04}, pages = {e173438}, abstract = {

Importance: While congenital malformations and genetic diseases are a leading cause of early infant death, to our knowledge, the contribution of single-gene disorders in this group is undetermined.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield and use of clinical exome sequencing in critically ill infants.

Design, Setting, and Participants: Clinical exome sequencing was performed for 278 unrelated infants within the first 100 days of life who were admitted to Texas Children{\textquoteright}s Hospital in Houston, Texas, during a 5-year period between December 2011 and January 2017. Exome sequencing types included proband exome, trio exome, and critical trio exome, a rapid genomic assay for seriously ill infants.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Indications for testing, diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing, turnaround time, molecular findings, patient age at diagnosis, and effect on medical management among a group of critically ill infants who were suspected to have genetic disorders.

Results: The mean (SEM) age for infants participating in the study was 28.5 (1.7) days; of these, the mean (SEM) age was 29.0 (2.2) days for infants undergoing proband exome sequencing, 31.5 (3.9) days for trio exome, and 22.7 (3.9) days for critical trio exome. Clinical indications for exome sequencing included a range of medical concerns. Overall, a molecular diagnosis was achieved in 102 infants (36.7\%) by clinical exome sequencing, with relatively low yield for cardiovascular abnormalities. The diagnosis affected medical management for 53 infants (52.0\%) and had a substantial effect on informed redirection of care, initiation of new subspecialist care, medication/dietary modifications, and furthering life-saving procedures in select patients. Critical trio exome sequencing revealed a molecular diagnosis in 32 of 63 infants (50.8\%) at a mean (SEM) of 33.1 (5.6) days of life with a mean (SEM) turnaround time of 13.0 (0.4) days. Clinical care was altered by the diagnosis in 23 of 32 patients (71.9\%). The diagnostic yield, patient age at diagnosis, and medical effect in the group that underwent critical trio exome sequencing were significantly different compared with the group who underwent regular exome testing. For deceased infants (n = 81), genetic disorders were molecularly diagnosed in 39 (48.1\%) by exome sequencing, with implications for recurrence risk counseling.

Conclusions and Relevance: Exome sequencing is a powerful tool for the diagnostic evaluation of critically ill infants with suspected monogenic disorders in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units and its use has a notable effect on clinical decision making.

}, keywords = {Adult, Critical Care, Disease Management, Exome, Genetic Counseling, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Humans, Infant, Infant Care, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Length of Stay, Retrospective Studies, Texas, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {2168-6211}, doi = {10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438}, author = {Meng, Linyan and Pammi, Mohan and Saronwala, Anirudh and Magoulas, Pilar and Ghazi, Andrew Ray and Vetrini, Francesco and Zhang, Jing and He, Weimin and Dharmadhikari, Avinash V and Qu, Chunjing and Ward, Patricia and Braxton, Alicia and Narayanan, Swetha and Ge, Xiaoyan and Tokita, Mari J and Santiago-Sim, Teresa and Dai, Hongzheng and Chiang, Theodore and Smith, Hadley and Azamian, Mahshid S and Robak, Laurie and Bostwick, Bret L and Schaaf, Christian P and Potocki, Lorraine and Scaglia, Fernando and Bacino, Carlos A and Hanchard, Neil A and Wangler, Michael F and Scott, Daryl and Brown, Chester and Hu, Jianhong and Belmont, John W and Burrage, Lindsay C and Graham, Brett H and Sutton, Vernon Reid and Craigen, William J and Plon, Sharon E and Lupski, James R and Beaudet, Arthur L and Gibbs, Richard A and Muzny, Donna M and Miller, Marcus J and Wang, Xia and Leduc, Magalie S and Xiao, Rui and Liu, Pengfei and Shaw, Chad and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Bi, Weimin and Xia, Fan and Lee, Brendan and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Lalani, Seema R} }