@article {687, title = {Aberrant Function of the C-Terminal Tail of HIST1H1E Accelerates Cellular Senescence and Causes Premature Aging.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {105}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Sep 05}, pages = {493-508}, abstract = {

Histones mediate dynamic packaging of nuclear DNA in chromatin, a process that is precisely controlled to guarantee efficient compaction of the genome and proper chromosomal segregation during cell division and to accomplish DNA replication, transcription, and repair. Due to the important structural and regulatory roles played by histones, it is not surprising that histone functional dysregulation or aberrant levels of histones can have severe consequences for multiple cellular processes and ultimately might affect development or contribute to cell transformation. Recently, germline frameshift mutations involving the C-terminal tail of HIST1H1E, which is a widely expressed member of the linker histone family and facilitates higher-order chromatin folding, have been causally linked to an as-yet poorly defined syndrome that includes intellectual disability. We report that these mutations result in stable proteins that reside in the nucleus, bind to chromatin, disrupt proper compaction of DNA, and are associated with a specific methylation pattern. Cells expressing these mutant proteins have a dramatically reduced proliferation rate and competence, hardly enter into the S phase, and undergo accelerated senescence. Remarkably, clinical assessment of a relatively large cohort of subjects sharing these mutations revealed a premature aging phenotype as a previously unrecognized feature of the disorder. Our findings identify a direct link between aberrant chromatin remodeling, cellular senescence, and accelerated aging.

}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.007}, author = {Flex, Elisabetta and Martinelli, Simone and Van Dijck, Anke and Ciolfi, Andrea and Cecchetti, Serena and Coluzzi, Elisa and Pannone, Luca and Andreoli, Cristina and Radio, Francesca Clementina and Pizzi, Simone and Carpentieri, Giovanna and Bruselles, Alessandro and Catanzaro, Giuseppina and Pedace, Lucia and Miele, Evelina and Carcarino, Elena and Ge, Xiaoyan and Chijiwa, Chieko and Lewis, M E Suzanne and Meuwissen, Marije and Kenis, Sandra and Van der Aa, Nathalie and Larson, Austin and Brown, Kathleen and Wasserstein, Melissa P and Skotko, Brian G and Begtrup, Amber and Person, Richard and Karayiorgou, Maria and Roos, J Louw and Van Gassen, Koen L and Koopmans, Marije and Bijlsma, Emilia K and Santen, Gijs W E and Barge-Schaapveld, Daniela Q C M and Ruivenkamp, Claudia A L and Hoffer, Mariette J V and Lalani, Seema R and Streff, Haley and Craigen, William J and Graham, Brett H and van den Elzen, Annette P M and Kamphuis, Daan J and {\~O}unap, Katrin and Reinson, Karit and Pajusalu, Sander and Wojcik, Monica H and Viberti, Clara and Di Gaetano, Cornelia and Bertini, Enrico and Petrucci, Simona and De Luca, Alessandro and Rota, Rossella and Ferretti, Elisabetta and Matullo, Giuseppe and Dallapiccola, Bruno and Sgura, Antonella and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Kooy, R Frank and Tartaglia, Marco} } @article {540, title = {Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management.}, journal = {JAMA Pediatr}, volume = {171}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 12 04}, pages = {e173438}, abstract = {

Importance: While congenital malformations and genetic diseases are a leading cause of early infant death, to our knowledge, the contribution of single-gene disorders in this group is undetermined.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield and use of clinical exome sequencing in critically ill infants.

Design, Setting, and Participants: Clinical exome sequencing was performed for 278 unrelated infants within the first 100 days of life who were admitted to Texas Children{\textquoteright}s Hospital in Houston, Texas, during a 5-year period between December 2011 and January 2017. Exome sequencing types included proband exome, trio exome, and critical trio exome, a rapid genomic assay for seriously ill infants.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Indications for testing, diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing, turnaround time, molecular findings, patient age at diagnosis, and effect on medical management among a group of critically ill infants who were suspected to have genetic disorders.

Results: The mean (SEM) age for infants participating in the study was 28.5 (1.7) days; of these, the mean (SEM) age was 29.0 (2.2) days for infants undergoing proband exome sequencing, 31.5 (3.9) days for trio exome, and 22.7 (3.9) days for critical trio exome. Clinical indications for exome sequencing included a range of medical concerns. Overall, a molecular diagnosis was achieved in 102 infants (36.7\%) by clinical exome sequencing, with relatively low yield for cardiovascular abnormalities. The diagnosis affected medical management for 53 infants (52.0\%) and had a substantial effect on informed redirection of care, initiation of new subspecialist care, medication/dietary modifications, and furthering life-saving procedures in select patients. Critical trio exome sequencing revealed a molecular diagnosis in 32 of 63 infants (50.8\%) at a mean (SEM) of 33.1 (5.6) days of life with a mean (SEM) turnaround time of 13.0 (0.4) days. Clinical care was altered by the diagnosis in 23 of 32 patients (71.9\%). The diagnostic yield, patient age at diagnosis, and medical effect in the group that underwent critical trio exome sequencing were significantly different compared with the group who underwent regular exome testing. For deceased infants (n = 81), genetic disorders were molecularly diagnosed in 39 (48.1\%) by exome sequencing, with implications for recurrence risk counseling.

Conclusions and Relevance: Exome sequencing is a powerful tool for the diagnostic evaluation of critically ill infants with suspected monogenic disorders in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units and its use has a notable effect on clinical decision making.

}, keywords = {Adult, Critical Care, Disease Management, Exome, Genetic Counseling, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Humans, Infant, Infant Care, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Length of Stay, Retrospective Studies, Texas, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {2168-6211}, doi = {10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438}, author = {Meng, Linyan and Pammi, Mohan and Saronwala, Anirudh and Magoulas, Pilar and Ghazi, Andrew Ray and Vetrini, Francesco and Zhang, Jing and He, Weimin and Dharmadhikari, Avinash V and Qu, Chunjing and Ward, Patricia and Braxton, Alicia and Narayanan, Swetha and Ge, Xiaoyan and Tokita, Mari J and Santiago-Sim, Teresa and Dai, Hongzheng and Chiang, Theodore and Smith, Hadley and Azamian, Mahshid S and Robak, Laurie and Bostwick, Bret L and Schaaf, Christian P and Potocki, Lorraine and Scaglia, Fernando and Bacino, Carlos A and Hanchard, Neil A and Wangler, Michael F and Scott, Daryl and Brown, Chester and Hu, Jianhong and Belmont, John W and Burrage, Lindsay C and Graham, Brett H and Sutton, Vernon Reid and Craigen, William J and Plon, Sharon E and Lupski, James R and Beaudet, Arthur L and Gibbs, Richard A and Muzny, Donna M and Miller, Marcus J and Wang, Xia and Leduc, Magalie S and Xiao, Rui and Liu, Pengfei and Shaw, Chad and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Bi, Weimin and Xia, Fan and Lee, Brendan and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Lalani, Seema R} }