@article {750, title = {Exome sequencing reveals a novel variant in causing intracranial aneurysm in a Chinese family.}, journal = {J Neurointerv Surg}, volume = {12}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Feb}, pages = {221-226}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Genetic risk factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of familial intracranial aneurysms (FIAs); however, the molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential FIA-causing genetic variants by rare variant interrogation and a family-based genomics approach in a large family with an extensive multigenerational pedigree with FIAs.

METHOD: Exome sequencing (ES) was performed in a dominant likely family with intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Variants were analyzed by an in-house developed pipeline and prioritized using various filtering strategies, including population frequency, variant type, and predicted variant pathogenicity. Sanger sequencing was also performed to evaluate the segregation of the variants with the phenotype.

RESULTS: Based on the ES data obtained from five individuals from a family with 7/21 living members affected with IAs, a total of 14 variants were prioritized as candidate variants. Familial segregation analysis revealed that c.2519T>C (p.Leu840Pro) segregated in accordance with Mendelian expectations with the phenotype within the family-that is, present in all IA-affected cases and absent from all unaffected members of the second generation. This missense variant is absent from public databases (1000genome, ExAC, gnomAD, ESP5400), and has damaging predictions by bioinformatics tools (Gerp ++ score = 5.88, CADD score = 16.43, MutationTaster score = 1, LRT score = 0). In addition, 840Leu in NFX1 is robustly conserved in mammals and maps in a region before the RING-type zinc finger domain.

CONCLUSION: c.2519T>C (p.Leu840Pro) may contribute to the pathogenetics of a subset of FIAs.

}, keywords = {Adult, Asian Continental Ancestry Group, Computational Biology, Exome, Female, Genetic Variation, Humans, Intracranial Aneurysm, Male, Middle Aged, Pedigree, Phenotype, Repressor Proteins}, issn = {1759-8486}, doi = {10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014900}, author = {Ding, Xinghuan and Zhao, Sen and Zhang, Qianqian and Yan, Zihui and Wang, Yang and Wu, Yong and Li, Xiaoxin and Liu, Jian and Niu, Yuchen and Zhang, Yisen and Zhang, Mingqi and Wang, Huizi and Zhang, Ying and Chen, Weisheng and Yang, Xin-Zhuang and Liu, Pengfei and Posey, Jennifer E and Lupski, James R and Wu, Zhihong and Yang, Xinjian and Wu, Nan and Wang, Kun} } @article {708, title = {Genetic and molecular mechanism for distinct clinical phenotypes conveyed by allelic truncating mutations implicated in FBN1.}, journal = {Mol Genet Genomic Med}, volume = {8}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 01}, pages = {e1023}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The molecular and genetic mechanisms by which different single nucleotide variant alleles in specific genes, or at the same genetic locus, cause distinct disease phenotypes often remain unclear. Allelic truncating mutations of FBN1 could cause either classical Marfan syndrome (MFS) or a more complicated phenotype associated with Marfanoid-progeroid-lipodystrophy syndrome (MPLS).

METHODS: We investigated a small cohort, encompassing two classical MFS and one MPLS subjects~from China, whose clinical presentation included scoliosis potentially requiring surgical intervention. Targeted next generation sequencing was performed on all the participants. We analyzed the molecular diagnosis, clinical features, and the potential molecular mechanism involved in the MPLS subject in our cohort.

RESULTS: We report a novel de novo FBN1 mutation for the first Chinese subject~with MPLS, a more complicated fibrillinopathy, and two subjects~with more classical MFS. We further predict that the MPLS truncating mutation, and others previously reported, is prone to escape the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), while MFS mutations are predicted to be subjected to NMD. Also, the MPLS mutation occurs within the glucogenic hormone asprosin domain of FBN1. In vitro experiments showed that the single MPLS mutation p.Glu2759Cysfs*9 appears to perturb proper FBN1 protein aggregation as compared with the~classical MFS mutation p.Tyr2596Thrfs*86. Both mutations appear to upregulate SMAD2 phosphorylation in vitro.

CONCLUSION: We provide direct evidence that a dominant-negative interaction of FBN1 potentially explains the complex MPLS phenotypes through genetic and functional analysis. Our study expands the mutation spectrum of FBN1 and highlights the potential molecular mechanism for MPLS.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Fibrillin-1, HEK293 Cells, Humans, Lipodystrophy, Marfan Syndrome, Mutation, Phenotype, Progeria, Protein Domains, Smad2 Protein}, issn = {2324-9269}, doi = {10.1002/mgg3.1023}, author = {Lin, Mao and Liu, Zhenlei and Liu, Gang and Zhao, Sen and Li, Chao and Chen, Weisheng and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep and Lin, Jiachen and Song, Xiaofei and Wang, Shengru and Xu, Qiming and Zhao, Yanxue and Wang, Lianlei and Zhang, Yuanqiang and Yan, Zihui and Liu, Sen and Liu, Jiaqi and Chen, Yixin and Zuo, Yuzhi and Yang, Xu and Sun, Tianshu and Yang, Xin-Zhuang and Niu, Yuchen and Li, Xiaoxin and You, Wesley and Qiu, Bintao and Ding, Chen and Liu, Pengfei and Zhang, Shuyang and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Posey, Jennifer E and Qiu, Guixing and Lupski, James R and Wu, Zhihong and Zhang, Jianguo and Wu, Nan} } @article {526, title = {The coexistence of copy number variations (CNVs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at a locus can result in distorted calculations of the significance in associating SNPs to disease.}, journal = {Hum Genet}, volume = {137}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jul}, pages = {553-567}, abstract = {

With the recent advance in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variants (CNVs) have been extensively reported. Accordingly, the issue of incorrect identification of recombination events that can induce the distortion of multi-allelic or hemizygous variants has received more attention. However, the potential distorted calculation bias or significance of a detected association in a GWAS due to the coexistence of CNVs and SNPs in the same genomic region may remain under-recognized. Here we performed the association study within a congenital scoliosis (CS) cohort whose genetic etiology was recently elucidated as a compound inheritance model, including mostly one rare variant deletion CNV null allele and one common variant non-coding hypomorphic haplotype of the TBX6 gene. We demonstrated that the existence of a deletion in TBX6 led to an overestimation of the contribution of the SNPs on the hypomorphic allele. Furthermore, we generalized a model to explain the calculation bias, or distorted significance calculation for an association study, that can be {\textquoteright}induced{\textquoteright} by CNVs at a locus. Meanwhile, overlapping between the disease-associated SNPs from published GWAS and common CNVs (overlap 10\%) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (overlap 99.69\%) was significantly higher than the random distribution (p < 1 {\texttimes} 10 and p = 0.034, respectively), indicating that such co-existence of CNV and SNV alleles might generally influence data interpretation and potential outcomes of a GWAS. We also verified and assessed the influence of colocalizing CNVs to the detection sensitivity of disease-associated SNP variant alleles in another adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) genome-wide association study. We proposed that detecting co-existent CNVs when evaluating the association signals between SNPs and disease traits could improve genetic model analyses and better integrate GWAS with robust Mendelian principles.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Congenital Abnormalities, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genomics, Genotype, Haplotypes, Humans, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Scoliosis}, issn = {1432-1203}, doi = {10.1007/s00439-018-1910-3}, author = {Liu, Jiaqi and Zhou, Yangzhong and Liu, Sen and Song, Xiaofei and Yang, Xin-Zhuang and Fan, Yanhui and Chen, Weisheng and Akdemir, Zeynep Coban and Yan, Zihui and Zuo, Yuzhi and Du, Renqian and Liu, Zhenlei and Yuan, Bo and Zhao, Sen and Liu, Gang and Chen, Yixin and Zhao, Yanxue and Lin, Mao and Zhu, Qiankun and Niu, Yuchen and Liu, Pengfei and Ikegawa, Shiro and Song, You-Qiang and Posey, Jennifer E and Qiu, Guixing and Zhang, Feng and Wu, Zhihong and Lupski, James R and Wu, Nan} }