@article {372, title = {Homozygous and hemizygous CNV detection from exome sequencing data in a Mendelian disease cohort.}, journal = {Nucleic Acids Res}, volume = {45}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 02 28}, pages = {1633-1648}, abstract = {

We developed an algorithm, HMZDelFinder, that uses whole exome sequencing (WES) data to identify rare and intragenic homozygous and hemizygous (HMZ) deletions that may represent complete loss-of-function of the indicated gene. HMZDelFinder was applied to 4866 samples in the Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics (BHCMG) cohort and detected 773 HMZ deletion calls (567 homozygous or 206 hemizygous) with an estimated sensitivity of 86.5\% (82\% for single-exonic and 88\% for multi-exonic calls) and precision of 78\% (53\% single-exonic and 96\% for multi-exonic calls). Out of 773 HMZDelFinder-detected deletion calls, 82 were subjected to array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and/or breakpoint PCR and 64 were confirmed. These include 18 single-exon deletions out of which 8 were exclusively detected by HMZDelFinder and not by any of seven other CNV detection tools examined. Further investigation of the 64 validated deletion calls revealed at least 15 pathogenic HMZ deletions. Of those, 7 accounted for 17-50\% of pathogenic CNVs in different disease cohorts where 7.1-11\% of the molecular diagnosis solved rate was attributed to CNVs. In summary, we present an algorithm to detect rare, intragenic, single-exon deletion CNVs using WES data; this tool can be useful for disease gene discovery efforts and clinical WES analyses.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Alternative Splicing, Cohort Studies, Computational Biology, Consanguinity, Datasets as Topic, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exome, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Hemizygote, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Homozygote, Humans, Inheritance Patterns, Models, Genetic, Pedigree, Reproducibility of Results, Sequence Deletion, Workflow}, issn = {1362-4962}, doi = {10.1093/nar/gkw1237}, author = {Gambin, Tomasz and Akdemir, Zeynep C and Yuan, Bo and Gu, Shen and Chiang, Theodore and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Shaw, Chad and Jhangiani, Shalini and Boone, Philip M and Eldomery, Mohammad K and Karaca, Ender and Bayram, Yavuz and Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and Muzny, Donna and Charng, Wu-Lin and Bahrambeigi, Vahid and Belmont, John W and Boerwinkle, Eric and Beaudet, Arthur L and Gibbs, Richard A and Lupski, James R} } @article {376, title = {Identification of novel candidate disease genes from de novo exonic copy number variants.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {9}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 09 21}, pages = {83}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Exon-targeted microarrays can detect small (<1000~bp) intragenic copy number variants (CNVs), including those that affect only a single exon. This genome-wide high-sensitivity approach increases the molecular diagnosis for conditions with known disease-associated genes, enables better genotype-phenotype correlations, and facilitates variant allele detection allowing novel disease gene discovery.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 63,127 patients referred for clinical chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) at Baylor Genetics laboratories, including 46,755 individuals tested using exon-targeted arrays, from 2007 to 2017. Small CNVs harboring a single gene or two to five non-disease-associated genes were identified; the genes involved were evaluated for a potential disease association.

RESULTS: In this clinical population, among rare CNVs involving any single gene reported in 7200 patients (11\%), we identified 145 de novo autosomal CNVs (117 losses and 28 intragenic gains), 257 X-linked deletion CNVs in males, and 1049 inherited autosomal CNVs (878 losses and 171 intragenic gains); 111 known disease genes were potentially disrupted by de novo autosomal or X-linked (in males) single-gene CNVs. Ninety-one genes, either recently proposed as candidate disease genes or not yet associated with diseases, were disrupted by 147 single-gene CNVs, including 37 de novo deletions and ten de novo intragenic duplications on autosomes and 100 X-linked CNVs in males. Clinical features in individuals with de novo or X-linked CNVs encompassing at most five genes (224~bp to 1.6~Mb in size) were compared to those in individuals with larger-sized deletions (up to 5~Mb in size) in the internal CMA database or loss-of-function single nucleotide variants (SNVs) detected by clinical or research whole-exome sequencing (WES). This enabled the identification of recently published genes (BPTF, NONO, PSMD12, TANGO2, and TRIP12), novel candidate disease genes (ARGLU1 and STK3), and further confirmation of disease association for two recently proposed disease genes (MEIS2 and PTCHD1). Notably, exon-targeted CMA detected several pathogenic single-exon CNVs missed by clinical WES analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data document the efficacy of exon-targeted CMA for detection of genic and exonic CNVs, complementing and extending WES in clinical diagnostics, and the potential for discovery of novel disease genes by genome-wide assay.

}, keywords = {Cohort Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exons, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Homeodomain Proteins, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Membrane Proteins, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases, Retrospective Studies, Transcription Factors, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-017-0472-7}, author = {Gambin, Tomasz and Yuan, Bo and Bi, Weimin and Liu, Pengfei and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Pursley, Amber N and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Marom, Ronit and Golla, Sailaja and Dengle, Lauren and Petrie, Heather G and Matalon, Reuben and Emrick, Lisa and Proud, Monica B and Treadwell-Deering, Diane and Chao, Hsiao-Tuan and Koillinen, Hannele and Brown, Chester and Urraca, Nora and Mostafavi, Roya and Bernes, Saunder and Roeder, Elizabeth R and Nugent, Kimberly M and Bader, Patricia I and Bellus, Gary and Cummings, Michael and Northrup, Hope and Ashfaq, Myla and Westman, Rachel and Wildin, Robert and Beck, Anita E and Immken, LaDonna and Elton, Lindsay and Varghese, Shaun and Buchanan, Edward and Faivre, Laurence and Lefebvre, Mathilde and Schaaf, Christian P and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Yang, Yaping and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Breman, Amy M and Smith, Janice L and Cheung, Sau Wai and Lupski, James R and Patel, Ankita and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {357, title = {Lessons learned from additional research analyses of unsolved clinical exome cases.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {9}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 03 21}, pages = {26}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Given the rarity of most single-gene Mendelian disorders, concerted efforts of data exchange between clinical and scientific communities are critical to optimize molecular diagnosis and novel disease gene discovery.

METHODS: We designed and implemented protocols for the study of cases for which a plausible molecular diagnosis was not achieved in a clinical genomics diagnostic laboratory (i.e. unsolved clinical exomes). Such cases were recruited to a research laboratory for further analyses, in order to potentially: (1) accelerate novel disease gene discovery; (2) increase the molecular diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing (WES); and (3) gain insight into the genetic mechanisms of disease. Pilot project data included 74 families, consisting mostly of parent-offspring trios. Analyses performed on a research basis employed both WES from additional family members and complementary bioinformatics approaches and protocols.

RESULTS: Analysis of all possible modes of Mendelian inheritance, focusing on both single nucleotide variants (SNV) and copy number variant (CNV) alleles, yielded a likely contributory variant in 36\% (27/74) of cases. If one includes candidate genes with variants identified within a single family, a potential contributory variant was identified in a total of ~51\% (38/74) of cases enrolled in this pilot study. The molecular diagnosis was achieved in 30/63 trios (47.6\%). Besides this, the analysis workflow yielded evidence for pathogenic variants in disease-associated genes in 4/6 singleton cases (66.6\%), 1/1 multiplex family involving three affected siblings, and 3/4 (75\%) quartet families. Both the analytical pipeline and the collaborative efforts between the diagnostic and research laboratories provided insights that allowed recent disease gene discoveries (PURA, TANGO2, EMC1, GNB5, ATAD3A, and MIPEP) and increased the number of novel genes, defined in this study as genes identified in more than one family (DHX30 and EBF3).

CONCLUSION: An efficient genomics pipeline in which clinical sequencing in a diagnostic laboratory is followed by the detailed reanalysis of unsolved cases in a research environment, supplemented with WES data from additional family members, and subject to adjuvant bioinformatics analyses including relaxed variant filtering parameters in informatics pipelines, can enhance the molecular diagnostic yield and provide mechanistic insights into Mendelian disorders. Implementing these approaches requires collaborative clinical molecular diagnostic and research efforts.

}, keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities, Computational Biology, DNA Copy Number Variations, DNA-Binding Proteins, Exome, Female, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, GTP-Binding Protein beta Subunits, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Metalloendopeptidases, Mitochondrial Proteins, Pilot Projects, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-017-0412-6}, author = {Eldomery, Mohammad K and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Harel, Tamar and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Gambin, Tomasz and Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and K{\"u}ry, S{\'e}bastien and Mercier, Sandra and Lessel, Davor and Denecke, Jonas and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Penney, Samantha and Liu, Pengfei and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Schaaf, Christian P and Wangler, Michael F and Bacino, Carlos A and Lewis, Richard Alan and Potocki, Lorraine and Graham, Brett H and Belmont, John W and Scaglia, Fernando and Orange, Jordan S and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Chiang, Theodore and Doddapaneni, Harsha and Hu, Jianhong and Muzny, Donna M and Xia, Fan and Beaudet, Arthur L and Boerwinkle, Eric and Eng, Christine M and Plon, Sharon E and Sutton, V Reid and Gibbs, Richard A and Posey, Jennifer E and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R} } @article {348, title = {An Organismal CNV Mutator Phenotype Restricted to Early Human Development.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {168}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 02 23}, pages = {830-842.e7}, abstract = {

De novo copy number variants (dnCNVs) arising at~multiple loci in a personal genome have usually been considered to reflect cancer somatic genomic instabilities. We describe a multiple dnCNV (MdnCNV) phenomenon in which individuals with genomic disorders carry five to ten constitutional dnCNVs. These CNVs originate from independent formation incidences, are predominantly tandem duplications or complex gains, exhibit breakpoint junction features reminiscent of replicative repair, and show increased de novo point mutations flanking the rearrangement junctions. The active CNV mutation shower appears to be restricted to a transient perizygotic period. We~propose that a defect in the CNV formation process is responsible for the "CNV-mutator state," and this state is dampened after early embryogenesis. The constitutional MdnCNV phenomenon resembles chromosomal instability in various cancers. Investigations of this phenomenon may provide unique access to understanding genomic disorders, structural variant mutagenesis, human evolution, and cancer biology.

}, keywords = {Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosome Breakpoints, Chromosome Duplication, DNA Copy Number Variations, DNA Replication, Embryonic Development, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomic Instability, Humans, Male, Mutation}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.037}, author = {Liu, Pengfei and Yuan, Bo and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Wuster, Arthur and Walter, Klaudia and Zhang, Ling and Gambin, Tomasz and Chong, Zechen and Campbell, Ian M and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep and Gelowani, Violet and Writzl, Karin and Bacino, Carlos A and Lindsay, Sarah J and Withers, Marjorie and Gonzaga-Jauregui, Claudia and Wiszniewska, Joanna and Scull, Jennifer and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Muzny, Donna M and Zhang, Feng and Chen, Ken and Gibbs, Richard A and Rautenstrauss, Bernd and Cheung, Sau Wai and Smith, Janice and Breman, Amy and Shaw, Chad A and Patel, Ankita and Hurles, Matthew E and Lupski, James R} } @article {110, title = {Molecular diagnostic experience of whole-exome sequencing in adult patients.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {18}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 07}, pages = {678-85}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool in medicine, but prior reports focus on predominantly pediatric cohorts with neurologic or developmental disorders. We describe the diagnostic yield and characteristics of WES in adults.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive WES reports for adults from a diagnostic laboratory. Phenotype composition was determined using Human Phenotype Ontology terms.

RESULTS: Molecular diagnoses were reported for 17.5\% (85/486) of adults, which is lower than that for a primarily pediatric population (25.2\%; P = 0.0003); the diagnostic rate was higher (23.9\%) for those 18-30 years of age compared to patients older than 30 years (10.4\%; P = 0.0001). Dual Mendelian diagnoses contributed to 7\% of diagnoses, revealing blended phenotypes. Diagnoses were more frequent among individuals with abnormalities of the nervous system, skeletal system, head/neck, and growth. Diagnostic rate was independent of family history information, and de novo mutations contributed to 61.4\% of autosomal dominant diagnoses.

CONCLUSION: Early WES experience in adults demonstrates molecular diagnoses in a substantial proportion of patients, informing clinical management, recurrence risk, and recommendations for relatives. A positive family history was not predictive, consistent with molecular diagnoses often revealed by de novo events, informing the Mendelian basis of genetic disease in adults.Genet Med 18 7, 678-685.

}, keywords = {Adult, Exome, Female, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, Genome, Human, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Male, Pathology, Molecular}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2015.142}, author = {Posey, Jennifer E and Rosenfeld, Jill A and James, Regis A and Bainbridge, Matthew and Niu, Zhiyv and Wang, Xia and Dhar, Shweta and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Akdemir, Zeynep H C and Gambin, Tomasz and Xia, Fan and Person, Richard E and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Shaw, Chad A and Sutton, V Reid and Beaudet, Arthur L and Muzny, Donna and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Gibbs, Richard A and Lupski, James R and Boerwinkle, Eric and Plon, Sharon E} } @article {149, title = {The Genetic Basis of Mendelian Phenotypes: Discoveries, Challenges, and Opportunities.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {97}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Aug 06}, pages = {199-215}, abstract = {

Discovering the genetic basis of a Mendelian phenotype establishes a causal link between genotype and phenotype, making possible carrier and population screening and direct diagnosis. Such discoveries also contribute to our knowledge of gene function, gene regulation, development, and biological mechanisms that can be used for developing new therapeutics. As of February 2015, 2,937 genes underlying 4,163 Mendelian phenotypes have been discovered, but the genes underlying \~{}50\% (i.e., 3,152) of all known Mendelian phenotypes are still unknown, and many more Mendelian conditions have yet to be recognized. This is a formidable gap in biomedical knowledge. Accordingly, in December 2011, the NIH established the Centers for Mendelian Genomics (CMGs) to provide the collaborative framework and infrastructure necessary for undertaking large-scale whole-exome sequencing and discovery of the genetic variants responsible for Mendelian phenotypes. In partnership with 529 investigators from 261 institutions in 36 countries, the CMGs assessed 18,863 samples from 8,838 families representing 579 known and 470 novel Mendelian phenotypes as of January 2015. This collaborative effort has identified 956 genes, including 375 not previously associated with human health, that underlie a Mendelian phenotype. These results provide insight into study design and analytical strategies, identify novel mechanisms of disease, and reveal the extensive clinical variability of Mendelian phenotypes. Discovering the gene underlying every Mendelian phenotype will require tackling challenges such as worldwide ascertainment and phenotypic characterization of families affected by Mendelian conditions, improvement in sequencing and analytical techniques, and pervasive sharing of phenotypic and genomic data among researchers, clinicians, and families.

}, keywords = {Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Phenotype, Proteins}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.06.009}, author = {Chong, Jessica X and Buckingham, Kati J and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Boehm, Corinne and Sobreira, Nara and Smith, Joshua D and Harrell, Tanya M and McMillin, Margaret J and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Gambin, Tomasz and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Doheny, Kimberly and Scott, Alan F and Avramopoulos, Dimitri and Chakravarti, Aravinda and Hoover-Fong, Julie and Mathews, Debra and Witmer, P Dane and Ling, Hua and Hetrick, Kurt and Watkins, Lee and Patterson, Karynne E and Reinier, Frederic and Blue, Elizabeth and Muzny, Donna and Kircher, Martin and Bilguvar, Kaya and L{\'o}pez-Gir{\'a}ldez, Francesc and Sutton, V Reid and Tabor, Holly K and Leal, Suzanne M and G{\"u}nel, Murat and Mane, Shrikant and Gibbs, Richard A and Boerwinkle, Eric and Hamosh, Ada and Shendure, Jay and Lupski, James R and Lifton, Richard P and Valle, David and Nickerson, Deborah A and Bamshad, Michael J} }