@article {698, title = {Paralog Studies Augment Gene Discovery: DDX and DHX Genes.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {105}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Aug 01}, pages = {302-316}, abstract = {

Members of a paralogous gene family in which variation in one gene is known to cause disease are eight times more likely to also be associated with human disease. Recent studies have elucidated DHX30 and DDX3X as genes for which pathogenic variant alleles are involved in neurodevelopmental disorders. We hypothesized that variants in paralogous genes encoding members of the DExD/H-box RNA helicase superfamily might also underlie developmental delay and/or intellectual disability (DD and/or ID) disease phenotypes. Here we describe 15 unrelated individuals who have DD and/or ID, central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction, vertebral anomalies, and dysmorphic features and were found to have probably damaging variants in DExD/H-box RNA helicase genes. In addition, these individuals exhibit a variety of other tissue and organ system involvement including ocular, outer ear, hearing, cardiac, and kidney tissues. Five individuals with homozygous (one), compound-heterozygous (two), or de novo (two) missense variants in DHX37 were identified by exome sequencing. We identified ten total individuals with missense variants in three other DDX/DHX paralogs: DHX16 (four~individuals), DDX54 (three individuals), and DHX34 (three individuals). Most identified variants are rare, predicted to be damaging, and occur at conserved amino acid residues. Taken together, these 15 individuals implicate the DExD/H-box helicases in both dominantly and recessively inherited neurodevelopmental phenotypes and highlight the potential for more than one disease mechanism underlying these disorders.

}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.001}, author = {Paine, Ingrid and Posey, Jennifer E and Grochowski, Christopher M and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Rosenheck, Sarah and Kleyner, Robert and Marmorale, Taylor and Yoon, Margaret and Wang, Kai and Robison, Reid and Cappuccio, Gerarda and Pinelli, Michele and Magli, Adriano and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep and Hui, Joannie and Yeung, Wai Lan and Wong, Bibiana K Y and Ortega, Lucia and Bekheirnia, Mir Reza and Bierhals, Tatjana and Hempel, Maja and Johannsen, Jessika and Santer, Ren{\'e} and Aktas, Dilek and Alika{\c s}ifo{\u g}lu, Mehmet and Bozdogan, Sevcan and Aydin, Hatip and Karaca, Ender and Bayram, Yavuz and Ityel, Hadas and Dorschner, Michael and White, Janson J and Wilichowski, Ekkehard and Wortmann, Saskia B and Casella, Erasmo B and Kitajima, Joao Paulo and Kok, Fernando and Monteiro, Fabiola and Muzny, Donna M and Bamshad, Michael and Gibbs, Richard A and Sutton, V Reid and Van Esch, Hilde and Brunetti-Pierri, Nicola and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm and Brautbar, Ariel and Van den Veyver, Ignatia B and Glass, Ian and Lessel, Davor and Lyon, Gholson J and Lupski, James R} } @article {612, title = {Phenotypic expansion illuminates multilocus pathogenic variation.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {20}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 12}, pages = {1528-1537}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Multilocus variation-pathogenic variants in two or more disease genes-can potentially explain the underlying genetic basis for apparent phenotypic expansion in cases for which the observed clinical features extend beyond those reported in association with a "known" disease gene.

METHODS: Analyses focused on 106 patients, 19 for whom apparent phenotypic expansion was previously attributed to variation at known disease genes. We performed a retrospective computational reanalysis of whole-exome sequencing data using stringent Variant Call File filtering criteria to determine whether molecular diagnoses involving additional disease loci might explain the observed expanded phenotypes.

RESULTS: Multilocus variation was identified in 31.6\% (6/19) of families with phenotypic expansion and 2.3\% (2/87) without phenotypic expansion. Intrafamilial clinical variability within two families was explained by multilocus variation identified in the more severely affected sibling.

CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the role of multiple rare variants at different loci in the etiology of genetically and clinically heterogeneous cohorts. Intrafamilial phenotypic and genotypic variability allowed a dissection of genotype-phenotype relationships in two families. Our data emphasize the critical role of the clinician in diagnostic genomic analyses and demonstrate that apparent phenotypic expansion may represent blended phenotypes resulting from pathogenic variation at more than one locus.

}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2018.33}, author = {Karaca, Ender and Posey, Jennifer E and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep and Pehlivan, Davut and Harel, Tamar and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Bayram, Yavuz and Song, Xiaofei and Bahrambeigi, Vahid and Yuregir, Ozge Ozalp and Bozdogan, Sevcan and Yesil, G{\"o}zde and Isikay, Sedat and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Lupski, James R} } @article {27, title = {Primary immunodeficiency diseases: Genomic approaches delineate heterogeneous Mendelian disorders.}, journal = {J Allergy Clin Immunol}, volume = {139}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jan}, pages = {232-245}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders thus far associated with mutations in more than 300 genes. The clinical phenotypes derived from distinct genotypes can overlap. Genetic etiology can be a prognostic indicator of disease severity and can influence treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the ability of whole-exome screening methods to detect disease-causing variants in patients with PIDDs.

METHODS: Patients with PIDDs from 278 families from 22 countries were investigated by using whole-exome sequencing. Computational copy number variant (CNV) prediction pipelines and an exome-tiling chromosomal microarray were also applied to identify intragenic CNVs. Analytic approaches initially focused on 475 known or candidate PIDD genes but were nonexclusive and further tailored based on clinical data, family history, and immunophenotyping.

RESULTS: A likely molecular diagnosis was achieved in 110 (40\%) unrelated probands. Clinical diagnosis was revised in about half (60/110) and management was directly altered in nearly a quarter (26/110) of families based on molecular findings. Twelve PIDD-causing CNVs were detected, including 7 smaller than 30~Kb that would not have been detected with conventional diagnostic CNV arrays.

CONCLUSION: This high-throughput genomic approach enabled detection of disease-related variants in unexpected genes; permitted detection of low-grade constitutional, somatic, and revertant mosaicism; and provided evidence of a mutational burden in mixed PIDD immunophenotypes.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult}, issn = {1097-6825}, doi = {10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.042}, author = {Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and Sorte, Hanne S{\o}rmo and Samarakoon, Pubudu and Gambin, Tomasz and Chinn, Ivan K and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Erichsen, Hans Christian and Forbes, Lisa R and Gu, Shen and Yuan, Bo and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Muzny, Donna M and R{\o}dningen, Olaug Kristin and Sheng, Ying and Nicholas, Sarah K and Noroski, Lenora M and Seeborg, Filiz O and Davis, Carla M and Canter, Debra L and Mace, Emily M and Vece, Timothy J and Allen, Carl E and Abhyankar, Harshal A and Boone, Philip M and Beck, Christine R and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Fevang, B{\o}rre and Aukrust, P{\r a}l and Tj{\o}nnfjord, Geir E and Gedde-Dahl, Tobias and Hjorth-Hansen, Henrik and Dybedal, Ingunn and Nord{\o}y, Ingvild and J{\o}rgensen, Silje F and Abrahamsen, Tore G and {\O}verland, Torstein and Bechensteen, Anne Grete and Skogen, Vegard and Osnes, Liv T N and Kulseth, Mari Ann and Prescott, Trine E and Rustad, Cecilie F and Heimdal, Ketil R and Belmont, John W and Rider, Nicholas L and Chinen, Javier and Cao, Tram N and Smith, Eric A and Caldirola, Maria Soledad and Bezrodnik, Liliana and Lugo Reyes, Saul Oswaldo and Espinosa Rosales, Francisco J and Guerrero-Cursaru, Nina Denisse and Pedroza, Luis Alberto and Poli, Cecilia M and Franco, Jose L and Trujillo Vargas, Claudia M and Aldave Becerra, Juan Carlos and Wright, Nicola and Issekutz, Thomas B and Issekutz, Andrew C and Abbott, Jordan and Caldwell, Jason W and Bayer, Diana K and Chan, Alice Y and Aiuti, Alessandro and Cancrini, Caterina and Holmberg, Eva and West, Christina and Burstedt, Magnus and Karaca, Ender and Yesil, G{\"o}zde and Artac, Hasibe and Bayram, Yavuz and Atik, Mehmed Musa and Eldomery, Mohammad K and Ehlayel, Mohammad S and Jolles, Stephen and Flat{\o}, Berit and Bertuch, Alison A and Hanson, I Celine and Zhang, Victor W and Wong, Lee-Jun and Hu, Jianhong and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Yang, Yaping and Eng, Christine M and Boerwinkle, Eric and Gibbs, Richard A and Shearer, William T and Lyle, Robert and Orange, Jordan S and Lupski, James R} } @article {355, title = {PRUNE is crucial for normal brain development and mutated in microcephaly with neurodevelopmental impairment.}, journal = {Brain}, volume = {140}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr 01}, pages = {940-952}, abstract = {

PRUNE is a member of the DHH (Asp-His-His) phosphoesterase protein superfamily of molecules important for cell motility, and implicated in cancer progression. Here we investigated multiple families from Oman, India, Iran and Italy with individuals affected by a new autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental and degenerative disorder in which the cardinal features include primary microcephaly and profound global developmental delay. Our genetic studies identified biallelic mutations of PRUNE1 as responsible. Our functional assays of disease-associated variant alleles revealed impaired microtubule polymerization, as well as cell migration and proliferation properties, of mutant PRUNE. Additionally, our studies also highlight a potential new role for PRUNE during microtubule polymerization, which is essential for the cytoskeletal rearrangements that occur during cellular division and proliferation. Together these studies define PRUNE as a molecule fundamental for normal human cortical development and define cellular and clinical consequences associated with PRUNE mutation.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Brain, Carrier Proteins, Cell Differentiation, Cell Movement, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Cytoskeleton, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Genes, Recessive, Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System, Humans, Infant, Male, Microcephaly, Microtubules, Mutation, Pedigree, Young Adult}, issn = {1460-2156}, doi = {10.1093/brain/awx014}, author = {Zollo, Massimo and Ahmed, Mustafa and Ferrucci, Veronica and Salpietro, Vincenzo and Asadzadeh, Fatemeh and Carotenuto, Marianeve and Maroofian, Reza and Al-Amri, Ahmed and Singh, Royana and Scognamiglio, Iolanda and Mojarrad, Majid and Musella, Luca and Duilio, Angela and Di Somma, Angela and Karaca, Ender and Rajab, Anna and Al-Khayat, Aisha and Mohan Mohapatra, Tribhuvan and Eslahi, Atieh and Ashrafzadeh, Farah and Rawlins, Lettie E and Prasad, Rajniti and Gupta, Rashmi and Kumari, Preeti and Srivastava, Mona and Cozzolino, Flora and Kumar Rai, Sunil and Monti, Maria and Harlalka, Gaurav V and Simpson, Michael A and Rich, Philip and Al-Salmi, Fatema and Patton, Michael A and Chioza, Barry A and Efthymiou, Stephanie and Granata, Francesca and Di Rosa, Gabriella and Wiethoff, Sarah and Borgione, Eugenia and Scuderi, Carmela and Mankad, Kshitij and Hanna, Michael G and Pucci, Piero and Houlden, Henry and Lupski, James R and Crosby, Andrew H and Baple, Emma L} }