@article {376, title = {Identification of novel candidate disease genes from de novo exonic copy number variants.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {9}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 09 21}, pages = {83}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Exon-targeted microarrays can detect small (<1000~bp) intragenic copy number variants (CNVs), including those that affect only a single exon. This genome-wide high-sensitivity approach increases the molecular diagnosis for conditions with known disease-associated genes, enables better genotype-phenotype correlations, and facilitates variant allele detection allowing novel disease gene discovery.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 63,127 patients referred for clinical chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) at Baylor Genetics laboratories, including 46,755 individuals tested using exon-targeted arrays, from 2007 to 2017. Small CNVs harboring a single gene or two to five non-disease-associated genes were identified; the genes involved were evaluated for a potential disease association.

RESULTS: In this clinical population, among rare CNVs involving any single gene reported in 7200 patients (11\%), we identified 145 de novo autosomal CNVs (117 losses and 28 intragenic gains), 257 X-linked deletion CNVs in males, and 1049 inherited autosomal CNVs (878 losses and 171 intragenic gains); 111 known disease genes were potentially disrupted by de novo autosomal or X-linked (in males) single-gene CNVs. Ninety-one genes, either recently proposed as candidate disease genes or not yet associated with diseases, were disrupted by 147 single-gene CNVs, including 37 de novo deletions and ten de novo intragenic duplications on autosomes and 100 X-linked CNVs in males. Clinical features in individuals with de novo or X-linked CNVs encompassing at most five genes (224~bp to 1.6~Mb in size) were compared to those in individuals with larger-sized deletions (up to 5~Mb in size) in the internal CMA database or loss-of-function single nucleotide variants (SNVs) detected by clinical or research whole-exome sequencing (WES). This enabled the identification of recently published genes (BPTF, NONO, PSMD12, TANGO2, and TRIP12), novel candidate disease genes (ARGLU1 and STK3), and further confirmation of disease association for two recently proposed disease genes (MEIS2 and PTCHD1). Notably, exon-targeted CMA detected several pathogenic single-exon CNVs missed by clinical WES analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data document the efficacy of exon-targeted CMA for detection of genic and exonic CNVs, complementing and extending WES in clinical diagnostics, and the potential for discovery of novel disease genes by genome-wide assay.

}, keywords = {Cohort Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exons, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Homeodomain Proteins, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Membrane Proteins, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases, Retrospective Studies, Transcription Factors, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-017-0472-7}, author = {Gambin, Tomasz and Yuan, Bo and Bi, Weimin and Liu, Pengfei and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Pursley, Amber N and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Marom, Ronit and Golla, Sailaja and Dengle, Lauren and Petrie, Heather G and Matalon, Reuben and Emrick, Lisa and Proud, Monica B and Treadwell-Deering, Diane and Chao, Hsiao-Tuan and Koillinen, Hannele and Brown, Chester and Urraca, Nora and Mostafavi, Roya and Bernes, Saunder and Roeder, Elizabeth R and Nugent, Kimberly M and Bader, Patricia I and Bellus, Gary and Cummings, Michael and Northrup, Hope and Ashfaq, Myla and Westman, Rachel and Wildin, Robert and Beck, Anita E and Immken, LaDonna and Elton, Lindsay and Varghese, Shaun and Buchanan, Edward and Faivre, Laurence and Lefebvre, Mathilde and Schaaf, Christian P and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Yang, Yaping and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Breman, Amy M and Smith, Janice L and Cheung, Sau Wai and Lupski, James R and Patel, Ankita and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {348, title = {An Organismal CNV Mutator Phenotype Restricted to Early Human Development.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {168}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 02 23}, pages = {830-842.e7}, abstract = {

De novo copy number variants (dnCNVs) arising at~multiple loci in a personal genome have usually been considered to reflect cancer somatic genomic instabilities. We describe a multiple dnCNV (MdnCNV) phenomenon in which individuals with genomic disorders carry five to ten constitutional dnCNVs. These CNVs originate from independent formation incidences, are predominantly tandem duplications or complex gains, exhibit breakpoint junction features reminiscent of replicative repair, and show increased de novo point mutations flanking the rearrangement junctions. The active CNV mutation shower appears to be restricted to a transient perizygotic period. We~propose that a defect in the CNV formation process is responsible for the "CNV-mutator state," and this state is dampened after early embryogenesis. The constitutional MdnCNV phenomenon resembles chromosomal instability in various cancers. Investigations of this phenomenon may provide unique access to understanding genomic disorders, structural variant mutagenesis, human evolution, and cancer biology.

}, keywords = {Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosome Breakpoints, Chromosome Duplication, DNA Copy Number Variations, DNA Replication, Embryonic Development, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomic Instability, Humans, Male, Mutation}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.037}, author = {Liu, Pengfei and Yuan, Bo and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Wuster, Arthur and Walter, Klaudia and Zhang, Ling and Gambin, Tomasz and Chong, Zechen and Campbell, Ian M and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep and Gelowani, Violet and Writzl, Karin and Bacino, Carlos A and Lindsay, Sarah J and Withers, Marjorie and Gonzaga-Jauregui, Claudia and Wiszniewska, Joanna and Scull, Jennifer and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Muzny, Donna M and Zhang, Feng and Chen, Ken and Gibbs, Richard A and Rautenstrauss, Bernd and Cheung, Sau Wai and Smith, Janice and Breman, Amy and Shaw, Chad A and Patel, Ankita and Hurles, Matthew E and Lupski, James R} } @article {339, title = {Resolution of Disease Phenotypes Resulting from Multilocus Genomic Variation.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {376}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 01 05}, pages = {21-31}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Whole-exome sequencing can provide insight into the relationship between observed clinical phenotypes and underlying genotypes.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a series of 7374 consecutive unrelated patients who had been referred to a clinical diagnostic laboratory for whole-exome sequencing; our goal was to determine the frequency and clinical characteristics of patients for whom more than one molecular diagnosis was reported. The phenotypic similarity between molecularly diagnosed pairs of diseases was calculated with the use of terms from the Human Phenotype Ontology.

RESULTS: A molecular diagnosis was rendered for 2076 of 7374 patients (28.2\%); among these patients, 101 (4.9\%) had diagnoses that involved two or more disease loci. We also analyzed parental samples, when available, and found that de novo variants accounted for 67.8\% (61 of 90) of pathogenic variants in autosomal dominant disease genes and 51.7\% (15 of 29) of pathogenic variants in X-linked disease genes; both variants were de novo in 44.7\% (17 of 38) of patients with two monoallelic variants. Causal copy-number variants were found in 12 patients (11.9\%) with multiple diagnoses. Phenotypic similarity scores were significantly lower among patients in whom the phenotype resulted from two distinct mendelian disorders that affected different organ systems (50 patients) than among patients with disorders that had overlapping phenotypic features (30 patients) (median score, 0.21 vs. 0.36; P=1.77{\texttimes}10).

CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found multiple molecular diagnoses in 4.9\% of cases in which whole-exome sequencing was informative. Our results show that structured clinical ontologies can be used to determine the degree of overlap between two mendelian diseases in the same patient; the diseases can be distinct or overlapping. Distinct disease phenotypes affect different organ systems, whereas overlapping disease phenotypes are more likely to be caused by two genes encoding proteins that interact within the same pathway. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Foundation.).

}, keywords = {Exome, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Variation, Genotyping Techniques, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Phenotype, Retrospective Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMoa1516767}, author = {Posey, Jennifer E and Harel, Tamar and Liu, Pengfei and Rosenfeld, Jill A and James, Regis A and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Bi, Weimin and Xiao, Rui and Ding, Yan and Xia, Fan and Beaudet, Arthur L and Muzny, Donna M and Gibbs, Richard A and Boerwinkle, Eric and Eng, Christine M and Sutton, V Reid and Shaw, Chad A and Plon, Sharon E and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R} } @article {110, title = {Molecular diagnostic experience of whole-exome sequencing in adult patients.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {18}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 07}, pages = {678-85}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool in medicine, but prior reports focus on predominantly pediatric cohorts with neurologic or developmental disorders. We describe the diagnostic yield and characteristics of WES in adults.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive WES reports for adults from a diagnostic laboratory. Phenotype composition was determined using Human Phenotype Ontology terms.

RESULTS: Molecular diagnoses were reported for 17.5\% (85/486) of adults, which is lower than that for a primarily pediatric population (25.2\%; P = 0.0003); the diagnostic rate was higher (23.9\%) for those 18-30 years of age compared to patients older than 30 years (10.4\%; P = 0.0001). Dual Mendelian diagnoses contributed to 7\% of diagnoses, revealing blended phenotypes. Diagnoses were more frequent among individuals with abnormalities of the nervous system, skeletal system, head/neck, and growth. Diagnostic rate was independent of family history information, and de novo mutations contributed to 61.4\% of autosomal dominant diagnoses.

CONCLUSION: Early WES experience in adults demonstrates molecular diagnoses in a substantial proportion of patients, informing clinical management, recurrence risk, and recommendations for relatives. A positive family history was not predictive, consistent with molecular diagnoses often revealed by de novo events, informing the Mendelian basis of genetic disease in adults.Genet Med 18 7, 678-685.

}, keywords = {Adult, Exome, Female, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, Genome, Human, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Male, Pathology, Molecular}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2015.142}, author = {Posey, Jennifer E and Rosenfeld, Jill A and James, Regis A and Bainbridge, Matthew and Niu, Zhiyv and Wang, Xia and Dhar, Shweta and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Akdemir, Zeynep H C and Gambin, Tomasz and Xia, Fan and Person, Richard E and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Shaw, Chad A and Sutton, V Reid and Beaudet, Arthur L and Muzny, Donna and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Gibbs, Richard A and Lupski, James R and Boerwinkle, Eric and Plon, Sharon E} } @article {169, title = {Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.}, journal = {Trends Genet}, volume = {31}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul}, pages = {382-92}, abstract = {

Nearly all of the genetic material among cells within an organism is identical. However, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions (indels), copy-number variants (CNVs), and other structural variants (SVs) continually accumulate as cells divide during development. This process results in an organism composed of countless cells, each with its own unique personal genome. Thus, every human is undoubtedly mosaic. Mosaic mutations can go unnoticed, underlie genetic disease or normal human variation, and may be transmitted to the next generation as constitutional variants. We review the influence of the developmental timing of mutations, the mechanisms by which they arise, methods for detecting mosaic variants, and the risk of passing these mutations on to the next generation.

}, keywords = {Animals, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Humans, Mosaicism, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion}, issn = {0168-9525}, doi = {10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.013}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Lupski, James R} } @article {222, title = {Parent of origin, mosaicism, and recurrence risk: probabilistic modeling explains the broken symmetry of transmission genetics.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Oct 02}, pages = {345-59}, abstract = {

Most new mutations are observed to arise in fathers, and increasing paternal age positively correlates with the risk of new variants. Interestingly, new mutations in X-linked recessive disease show elevated familial recurrence rates. In male offspring, these mutations must be inherited from mothers. We previously developed a simulation model to consider parental mosaicism as a source of transmitted mutations. In this paper, we extend and formalize the model to provide analytical results and flexible formulas. The results implicate parent of origin and parental mosaicism as central variables in recurrence risk. Consistent with empirical data, our model predicts that more transmitted mutations arise in fathers and that this tendency increases as fathers age. Notably, the lack of expansion later in the male germline determines relatively lower variance in the proportion of mutants, which decreases with paternal age. Subsequently, observation of a transmitted mutation has less impact on the expected risk for future offspring. Conversely, for the female germline, which arrests after clonal expansion in early development, variance in the mutant proportion is higher, and observation of a transmitted mutation dramatically increases the expected risk of recurrence in another pregnancy. Parental somatic mosaicism considerably elevates risk for both parents. These findings have important implications for genetic counseling and for understanding patterns of recurrence in transmission genetics. We provide a convenient online tool and source code implementing our analytical results. These tools permit varying the underlying parameters that influence recurrence risk and could be useful for analyzing risk in diverse family structures.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chromosome Aberrations, DNA Copy Number Variations, Fathers, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Inheritance Patterns, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Mosaicism, Mothers, Pregnancy, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Young Adult}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.08.010}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Stewart, Jonathan R and James, Regis A and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Olofsson, Peter and Shaw, Chad A} } @article {229, title = {Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Aug 07}, pages = {173-82}, abstract = {

New human mutations are thought to originate in germ cells, thus making a recurrence of the same mutation in a sibling exceedingly rare. However, increasing sensitivity of genomic technologies has anecdotally revealed mosaicism for mutations in somatic tissues of apparently healthy parents. Such somatically mosaic parents might also have germline mosaicism that can potentially cause unexpected intergenerational recurrences. Here, we show that somatic mosaicism for transmitted mutations among parents of children with simplex genetic disease is more common than currently appreciated. Using the sensitivity of individual-specific breakpoint PCR, we prospectively screened 100 families with children affected by genomic disorders due to rare deletion copy-number variants (CNVs) determined to be de novo by clinical analysis of parental DNA. Surprisingly, we identified four cases of low-level somatic mosaicism for the transmitted CNV in DNA isolated from parental blood. Integrated probabilistic modeling of gametogenesis developed in response to our observations predicts that mutations in parental blood increase recurrence risk substantially more than parental mutations confined to the germline. Moreover, despite the fact that maternally transmitted mutations are the minority of alleles, our model suggests that sexual dimorphisms in gametogenesis result in a greater proportion of somatically mosaic transmitting mothers who are thus at increased risk of recurrence. Therefore, somatic mosaicism together with sexual differences in gametogenesis might explain a considerable fraction of unexpected recurrences of X-linked recessive disease. Overall, our results underscore an important role for somatic mosaicism and mitotic replicative mutational mechanisms in transmission genetics.

}, keywords = {Cell Division, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Mosaicism, Mutation, Pedigree, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk, Sex Characteristics, Smith-Magenis Syndrome}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.003}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Yuan, Bo and Robberecht, Caroline and Pfundt, Rolph and Szafranski, Przemyslaw and McEntagart, Meriel E and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Bartnik, Magdalena and Wi{\'s}niowiecka-Kowalnik, Barbara and Plunkett, Katie S and Pursley, Amber N and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Vast, Mala and Marks, Karen and Patton, Michael and Olofsson, Peter and Patel, Ankita and Veltman, Joris A and Cheung, Sau Wai and Shaw, Chad A and Vissers, Lisenka E L M and Vermeesch, Joris R and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {301, title = {Deletions of recessive disease genes: CNV contribution to carrier states and disease-causing alleles.}, journal = {Genome Res}, volume = {23}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Sep}, pages = {1383-94}, abstract = {

Over 1200 recessive disease genes have been described in humans. The prevalence, allelic architecture, and per-genome load of pathogenic alleles in these genes remain to be fully elucidated, as does the contribution of DNA copy-number variants (CNVs) to carrier status and recessive disease. We mined CNV data from 21,470 individuals obtained by array-comparative genomic hybridization in a clinical diagnostic setting to identify deletions encompassing or disrupting recessive disease genes. We identified 3212 heterozygous potential carrier deletions affecting 419 unique recessive disease genes. Deletion frequency of these genes ranged from one occurrence to 1.5\%. When compared with recessive disease genes never deleted in our cohort, the 419 recessive disease genes affected by at least one carrier deletion were longer and located farther from known dominant disease genes, suggesting that the formation and/or prevalence of carrier CNVs may be affected by both local and adjacent genomic features and by selection. Some subjects had multiple carrier CNVs (307 subjects) and/or carrier deletions encompassing more than one recessive disease gene (206 deletions). Heterozygous deletions spanning multiple recessive disease genes may confer carrier status for multiple single-gene disorders, for complex syndromes resulting from the combination of two or more recessive conditions, or may potentially cause clinical phenotypes due to a multiply heterozygous state. In addition to carrier mutations, we identified homozygous and hemizygous deletions potentially causative for recessive disease. We provide further evidence that CNVs contribute to the allelic architecture of both carrier and recessive disease-causing mutations. Thus, a complete recessive carrier screening method or diagnostic test should detect CNV alleles.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Databases, Genetic, DNA Copy Number Variations, Gene Deletion, Gene Frequency, Genes, Dominant, Genes, Recessive, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Homozygote, Humans}, issn = {1549-5469}, doi = {10.1101/gr.156075.113}, author = {Boone, Philip M and Campbell, Ian M and Baggett, Brett C and Soens, Zachry T and Rao, Mitchell M and Hixson, Patricia M and Patel, Ankita and Bi, Weimin and Cheung, Sau Wai and Lalani, Seema R and Beaudet, Arthur L and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Shaw, Chad A and Lupski, James R} }