@article {617, title = {Predicting human genes susceptible to genomic instability associated with /-mediated rearrangements.}, journal = {Genome Res}, volume = {28}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 08}, pages = {1228-1242}, abstract = {

elements, the short interspersed element numbering more than 1 million copies per human genome, can mediate the formation of copy number variants (CNVs) between substrate pairs. These /-mediated rearrangements (AAMRs) can result in pathogenic variants that cause diseases. To investigate the impact of AAMR on gene variation and human health, we first characterized s that are involved in mediating CNVs (CNV-s) and observed that these s tend to be evolutionarily younger. We then computationally generated, with the assistance of a supercomputer, a test data set consisting of 78 million pairs and predicted \~{}18\% of them are potentially susceptible to AAMR. We further determined the relative risk of AAMR in 12,074 OMIM genes using the count of predicted CNV- pairs and experimentally validated the predictions with 89 samples selected by correlating predicted hotspots with a database of CNVs identified by clinical chromosomal microarrays (CMAs) on the genomes of approximately 54,000 subjects. We fine-mapped 47 duplications, 40 deletions, and two complex rearrangements and examined a total of 52 breakpoint junctions of simple CNVs. Overall, 94\% of the candidate breakpoints were at least partially mediated. We successfully predicted all (100\%) of pairs that mediated deletions ( = 21) and achieved an 87\% positive predictive value overall when including AAMR-generated deletions and duplications. We provided a tool, AluAluCNVpredictor, for assessing AAMR hotspots and their role in human disease. These results demonstrate the utility of our predictive model and provide insights into the genomic features and molecular mechanisms underlying AAMR.

}, keywords = {Alu Elements, DNA Copy Number Variations, Gene Duplication, Genome, Human, Genomic Instability, Humans, Sequence Deletion}, issn = {1549-5469}, doi = {10.1101/gr.229401.117}, author = {Song, Xiaofei and Beck, Christine R and Du, Renqian and Campbell, Ian M and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Gu, Shen and Breman, Amy M and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Ira, Grzegorz and Shaw, Chad A and Lupski, James R} } @article {119, title = {Mechanisms for the Generation of Two Quadruplications Associated with Split-Hand Malformation.}, journal = {Hum Mutat}, volume = {37}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Feb}, pages = {160-4}, abstract = {

Germline copy-number variants (CNVs) involving quadruplications are rare and the mechanisms generating them are largely unknown. Previously, we reported a 20-week gestation fetus with split-hand malformation; clinical microarray detected two maternally inherited triplications separated by a copy-number neutral region at 17p13.3, involving BHLHA9 and part of YWHAE. Here, we describe an 18-month-old male sibling of the previously described fetus with split-hand malformation. Custom high-density microarray and digital droplet PCR revealed the copy-number gains were actually quadruplications in the mother, the fetus, and her later born son. This quadruplication-normal-quadruplication pattern was shown to be expanded from the triplication-normal-triplication CNV at the same loci in the maternal grandmother. We mapped two breakpoint junctions and demonstrated that both are mediated by Alu repetitive elements and identical in these four individuals. We propose a three-step process combining Alu-mediated replicative-repair-based mechanism(s) and intergenerational, intrachromosomal nonallelic homologous recombination to generate the quadruplications in this family.

}, keywords = {14-3-3 Proteins, Adult, Aged, Alu Elements, Base Sequence, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Chromosome Duplication, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Genetic Loci, Genome, Human, Hand Deformities, Congenital, Humans, Infant, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Pedigree, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1098-1004}, doi = {10.1002/humu.22929}, author = {Gu, Shen and Posey, Jennifer E and Yuan, Bo and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Luk, H M and Erikson, Kelly and Lo, Ivan F M and Leung, Gordon K C and Pickering, Curtis R and Chung, Brian H Y and Lupski, James R} } @article {170, title = {Alu-mediated diverse and complex pathogenic copy-number variants within human chromosome 17 at p13.3.}, journal = {Hum Mol Genet}, volume = {24}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul 15}, pages = {4061-77}, abstract = {

Alu repetitive elements are known to be major contributors to genome instability by generating Alu-mediated copy-number variants (CNVs). Most of the reported Alu-mediated CNVs are simple deletions and duplications, and the mechanism underlying Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangement has been attributed to non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Chromosome 17 at the p13.3 genomic region lacks extensive low-copy repeat architecture; however, it is highly enriched for Alu repetitive elements, with a fraction of 30\% of total sequence annotated in the human reference genome, compared with the 10\% genome-wide and 18\% on chromosome 17. We conducted mechanistic studies of the 17p13.3 CNVs by performing high-density oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization, specifically interrogating the 17p13.3 region with \~{}150 bp per probe density; CNV breakpoint junctions were mapped to nucleotide resolution by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Studied rearrangements include 5 interstitial deletions, 14 tandem duplications, 7 terminal deletions and 13 complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs). Within the 17p13.3 region, Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangements were identified in 80\% of the interstitial deletions, 46\% of the tandem duplications and 50\% of the CGRs, indicating that this mechanism was a major contributor for formation of breakpoint junctions. Our studies suggest that Alu repetitive elements facilitate formation of non-recurrent CNVs, CGRs and other structural aberrations of chromosome 17 at p13.3. The common observation of Alu-mediated rearrangement in CGRs and breakpoint junction sequences analysis further demonstrates that this type of mechanism is unlikely attributed to NAHR, but rather may be due to a recombination-coupled DNA replicative repair process.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Alu Elements, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gene Duplication, Gene Rearrangement, Genome, Human, Genomic Instability, Genomics, Homologous Recombination, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Segmental Duplications, Genomic, Sequence Deletion}, issn = {1460-2083}, doi = {10.1093/hmg/ddv146}, author = {Gu, Shen and Yuan, Bo and Campbell, Ian M and Beck, Christine R and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Patel, Ankita and Bacino, Carlos A and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bi, Weimin and Lupski, James R} }