@article {27, title = {Primary immunodeficiency diseases: Genomic approaches delineate heterogeneous Mendelian disorders.}, journal = {J Allergy Clin Immunol}, volume = {139}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jan}, pages = {232-245}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders thus far associated with mutations in more than 300 genes. The clinical phenotypes derived from distinct genotypes can overlap. Genetic etiology can be a prognostic indicator of disease severity and can influence treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the ability of whole-exome screening methods to detect disease-causing variants in patients with PIDDs.

METHODS: Patients with PIDDs from 278 families from 22 countries were investigated by using whole-exome sequencing. Computational copy number variant (CNV) prediction pipelines and an exome-tiling chromosomal microarray were also applied to identify intragenic CNVs. Analytic approaches initially focused on 475 known or candidate PIDD genes but were nonexclusive and further tailored based on clinical data, family history, and immunophenotyping.

RESULTS: A likely molecular diagnosis was achieved in 110 (40\%) unrelated probands. Clinical diagnosis was revised in about half (60/110) and management was directly altered in nearly a quarter (26/110) of families based on molecular findings. Twelve PIDD-causing CNVs were detected, including 7 smaller than 30~Kb that would not have been detected with conventional diagnostic CNV arrays.

CONCLUSION: This high-throughput genomic approach enabled detection of disease-related variants in unexpected genes; permitted detection of low-grade constitutional, somatic, and revertant mosaicism; and provided evidence of a mutational burden in mixed PIDD immunophenotypes.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult}, issn = {1097-6825}, doi = {10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.042}, author = {Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and Sorte, Hanne S{\o}rmo and Samarakoon, Pubudu and Gambin, Tomasz and Chinn, Ivan K and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Erichsen, Hans Christian and Forbes, Lisa R and Gu, Shen and Yuan, Bo and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Muzny, Donna M and R{\o}dningen, Olaug Kristin and Sheng, Ying and Nicholas, Sarah K and Noroski, Lenora M and Seeborg, Filiz O and Davis, Carla M and Canter, Debra L and Mace, Emily M and Vece, Timothy J and Allen, Carl E and Abhyankar, Harshal A and Boone, Philip M and Beck, Christine R and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Fevang, B{\o}rre and Aukrust, P{\r a}l and Tj{\o}nnfjord, Geir E and Gedde-Dahl, Tobias and Hjorth-Hansen, Henrik and Dybedal, Ingunn and Nord{\o}y, Ingvild and J{\o}rgensen, Silje F and Abrahamsen, Tore G and {\O}verland, Torstein and Bechensteen, Anne Grete and Skogen, Vegard and Osnes, Liv T N and Kulseth, Mari Ann and Prescott, Trine E and Rustad, Cecilie F and Heimdal, Ketil R and Belmont, John W and Rider, Nicholas L and Chinen, Javier and Cao, Tram N and Smith, Eric A and Caldirola, Maria Soledad and Bezrodnik, Liliana and Lugo Reyes, Saul Oswaldo and Espinosa Rosales, Francisco J and Guerrero-Cursaru, Nina Denisse and Pedroza, Luis Alberto and Poli, Cecilia M and Franco, Jose L and Trujillo Vargas, Claudia M and Aldave Becerra, Juan Carlos and Wright, Nicola and Issekutz, Thomas B and Issekutz, Andrew C and Abbott, Jordan and Caldwell, Jason W and Bayer, Diana K and Chan, Alice Y and Aiuti, Alessandro and Cancrini, Caterina and Holmberg, Eva and West, Christina and Burstedt, Magnus and Karaca, Ender and Yesil, G{\"o}zde and Artac, Hasibe and Bayram, Yavuz and Atik, Mehmed Musa and Eldomery, Mohammad K and Ehlayel, Mohammad S and Jolles, Stephen and Flat{\o}, Berit and Bertuch, Alison A and Hanson, I Celine and Zhang, Victor W and Wong, Lee-Jun and Hu, Jianhong and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Yang, Yaping and Eng, Christine M and Boerwinkle, Eric and Gibbs, Richard A and Shearer, William T and Lyle, Robert and Orange, Jordan S and Lupski, James R} } @article {285, title = {Exonic duplication CNV of NDRG1 associated with autosomal-recessive HMSN-Lom/CMT4D.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {16}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 May}, pages = {386-394}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Copy-number variations as a mutational mechanism contribute significantly to human disease. Approximately one-half of the patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease have a 1.4 Mb duplication copy-number variation as the cause of their neuropathy. However, non-CMT1A neuropathy patients rarely have causative copy-number variations, and to date, autosomal-recessive disease has not been associated with copy-number variation as a mutational mechanism.

METHODS: We performed Agilent 8 {\texttimes} 60 K array comparative genomic hybridization on DNA from 12 recessive Turkish families with CMT disease. Additional molecular studies were conducted to detect breakpoint junctions and to evaluate gene expression levels in a family in which we detected an intragenic duplication copy-number variation.

RESULTS: We detected an ~6.25 kb homozygous intragenic duplication in NDRG1, a gene known to be causative for recessive HMSNL/CMT4D, in three individuals from a Turkish family with CMT neuropathy. Further studies showed that this intragenic copy-number variation resulted in a homozygous duplication of exons 6-8 that caused decreased mRNA expression of NDRG1.

CONCLUSION: Exon-focused high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization enables the detection of copy-number variation carrier states in recessive genes, particularly small copy-number variations encompassing or disrupting single genes. In families for whom a molecular diagnosis has not been elucidated by conventional clinical assays, an assessment for copy-number variations in known CMT genes might be considered.

}, keywords = {Adult, Base Sequence, Cell Cycle Proteins, Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gene Duplication, Gene Expression, Genes, Recessive, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Male, Mutation, Refsum Disease, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Turkey, Young Adult}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2013.155}, author = {Okamoto, Yuji and Goksungur, Meryem Tuba and Pehlivan, Davut and Beck, Christine R and Gonzaga-Jauregui, Claudia and Muzny, Donna M and Atik, Mehmed M and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Matur, Zeliha and Bayraktar, Serife and Boone, Philip M and Akyuz, Kaya and Gibbs, Richard A and Battaloglu, Esra and Parman, Yesim and Lupski, James R} } @article {323, title = {Incidental copy-number variants identified by routine genome testing in a clinical population.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {15}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jan}, pages = {45-54}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Mutational load of susceptibility variants has not been studied on a genomic scale in a clinical population, nor has the potential to identify these mutations as incidental findings during clinical testing been systematically ascertained.

METHODS: Array comparative genomic hybridization, a method for genome-wide detection of DNA copy-number variants, was performed clinically on DNA from 9,005 individuals. Copy-number variants encompassing or disrupting single genes were identified and analyzed for their potential to confer predisposition to dominant, adult-onset disease. Multigene copy-number variants affecting dominant, adult-onset cancer syndrome genes were also assessed.

RESULTS: In our cohort, 83 single-gene copy-number variants affected 40 unique genes associated with dominant, adult-onset disorders and unrelated to the patients{\textquoteright} referring diagnoses (i.e., incidental) were found. Fourteen of these copy-number variants are likely disease-predisposing, 25 are likely benign, and 44 are of unknown clinical consequence. When incidental copy-number variants spanning up to 20 genes were considered, 27 copy-number variants affected 17 unique genes associated with dominant, adult-onset cancer predisposition.

CONCLUSION: Copy-number variants potentially conferring susceptibility to adult-onset disease can be identified as incidental findings during routine genome-wide testing. Some of these mutations may be medically actionable, enabling disease surveillance or prevention; however, most incidentally observed single-gene copy-number variants are currently of unclear significance to the patient.

}, keywords = {Age of Onset, Base Sequence, Chromosome Mapping, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gene Order, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Inheritance Patterns, Male, Reproducibility of Results}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2012.95}, author = {Boone, Philip M and Soens, Zachry T and Campbell, Ian M and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Cheung, Sau Wai and Patel, Ankita and Beaudet, Arthur L and Plon, Sharon E and Shaw, Chad A and McGuire, Amy L and Lupski, James R} }