@article {782, title = {CNVs cause autosomal recessive genetic diseases with or without involvement of SNV/indels.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {22}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {1633-1641}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Improved resolution of molecular diagnostic technologies enabled detection of smaller sized exonic level copy-number variants (CNVs). The contribution of CNVs to autosomal recessive (AR) conditions may be better recognized using a large clinical cohort.

METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the CNVs{\textquoteright} contribution to AR conditions in cases subjected to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA, N = ~70,000) and/or clinical exome sequencing (ES, N = ~12,000) at Baylor Genetics; most had pediatric onset neurodevelopmental disorders.

RESULTS: CNVs contributed to biallelic variations in 87 cases, including 81 singletons and three affected sibling pairs. Seventy cases had CNVs affecting both alleles, and 17 had a CNV and a single-nucleotide variant (SNV)/indel in trans. In total, 94.3\% of AR-CNVs affected one gene; among these 41.4\% were single-exon and 35.0\% were multiexon partial-gene events. Sixty-nine percent of homozygous AR-CNVs were embedded in homozygous genomic intervals. Five cases had large deletions unmasking an SNV/indel on the intact allele for a recessive condition, resulting in multiple molecular diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS: AR-CNVs are often smaller in size, transmitted through generations, and underrecognized due to limitations in clinical CNV detection methods. Our findings from a large clinical cohort emphasized integrated CNV and SNV/indel analyses for precise clinical and molecular diagnosis especially in the context of genomic disorders.

}, keywords = {Child, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exons, Humans, INDEL Mutation, Retrospective Studies, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/s41436-020-0864-8}, author = {Yuan, Bo and Wang, Lei and Liu, Pengfei and Shaw, Chad and Dai, Hongzheng and Cooper, Lance and Zhu, Wenmiao and Anderson, Stephanie A and Meng, Linyan and Wang, Xia and Wang, Yue and Xia, Fan and Xiao, Rui and Braxton, Alicia and Peacock, Sandra and Schmitt, Eric and Ward, Patricia A and Vetrini, Francesco and He, Weimin and Chiang, Theodore and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Breman, Amy M and Smith, Janice and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bacino, Carlos A and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R and Bi, Weimin} } @article {792, title = {Quantitative Assessment of Parental Somatic Mosaicism for Copy-Number Variant (CNV) Deletions.}, journal = {Curr Protoc Hum Genet}, volume = {106}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 06}, pages = {e99}, abstract = {

As genome sequencing methodologies have become more sensitive in detecting low-frequency rare-variant events, the link between post-zygotic mutagenesis and somatic mosaicism in the etiology of several human genetic conditions other than cancers has become more clear. Given that current clinical-genomics diagnostic methods have limited detection sensitivity for mosaic events, a copy-number variant (CNV) deletion inherited from a parent with low-level (<10\%) mosaicism can be erroneously interpreted in the proband to represent a de novo germline event. Here, we describe three sensitive, precise, and cost-efficient methods that can quantitatively assess the potential degree of parental somatic mosaicism levels for CNV deletions: droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), PCR amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), and quantitative PCR. ddPCR using the EvaGreen fluorescent dye protocol can specifically quantify the deleted or non-deleted alleles by analyzing the number of droplets positive for a fluorescent signal for each event. PCR amplicon-based NGS assesses the allele frequencies of a heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphism within a deletion region. The difference in number of reads between the two genotypes indicates the level of somatic mosaicism for the CNV deletion. Quantitative PCR can be applied where the relative quantity of the deletion junction-specific product represents the level of mosaicism. Clinical implementation of these quantitative variant-detection methods enables potentially more accurate assessment of disease recurrence risk in family-based genetic counseling, allowing couples to engage in more informed family planning. {\textcopyright} 2020 by John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) Alternate Protocol 1: PCR amplicon-based next-generation sequencing Alternate Protocol 2: Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

}, keywords = {DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Mosaicism, Parents, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction}, issn = {1934-8258}, doi = {10.1002/cphg.99}, author = {Liu, Qian and Grochowski, Christopher M and Bi, Weimin and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {335, title = {De Novo Disruption of the Proteasome Regulatory Subunit PSMD12 Causes a Syndromic Neurodevelopmental Disorder.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {100}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Feb 02}, pages = {352-363}, abstract = {

Degradation of proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is an essential biological process in the development of eukaryotic organisms. Dysregulation of this mechanism leads to numerous human neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental disorders. Through a multi-center collaboration, we identified six de novo genomic deletions and four de novo point mutations involving PSMD12, encoding the non-ATPase subunit PSMD12 (aka RPN5) of the 19S regulator of 26S proteasome complex, in unrelated individuals with intellectual disability, congenital malformations, ophthalmologic anomalies, feeding difficulties, deafness, and subtle dysmorphic facial features. We observed reduced PSMD12 levels and an accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins without any impairment of proteasome catalytic activity. Our PSMD12 loss-of-function zebrafish CRISPR/Cas9 model exhibited microcephaly, decreased convolution of the renal tubules, and abnormal craniofacial morphology. Our data support the biological importance of PSMD12 as a scaffolding subunit in proteasome function during development and neurogenesis in particular; they enable the definition of a neurodevelopmental disorder due to PSMD12 variants, expanding the phenotypic spectrum of UPS-dependent disorders.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Disease Models, Animal, DNA Copy Number Variations, Down-Regulation, Female, Gene Deletion, Humans, Infant, Intellectual Disability, Male, Microcephaly, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Zebrafish}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.003}, author = {K{\"u}ry, S{\'e}bastien and Besnard, Thomas and Ebstein, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Khan, Tahir N and Gambin, Tomasz and Douglas, Jessica and Bacino, Carlos A and Craigen, William J and Sanders, Stephan J and Lehmann, Andrea and Latypova, X{\'e}nia and Khan, Kamal and Pacault, Mathilde and Sacharow, Stephanie and Glaser, Kimberly and Bieth, Eric and Perrin-Sabourin, Laurence and Jacquemont, Marie-Line and Cho, Megan T and Roeder, Elizabeth and Denomm{\'e}-Pichon, Anne-Sophie and Monaghan, Kristin G and Yuan, Bo and Xia, Fan and Simon, Sylvain and Bonneau, Dominique and Parent, Philippe and Gilbert-Dussardier, Brigitte and Odent, Sylvie and Toutain, Annick and Pasquier, Laurent and Barbouth, Deborah and Shaw, Chad A and Patel, Ankita and Smith, Janice L and Bi, Weimin and Schmitt, S{\'e}bastien and Deb, Wallid and Nizon, Mathilde and Mercier, Sandra and Vincent, Marie and Rooryck, Caroline and Malan, Val{\'e}rie and Brice{\~n}o, Ignacio and G{\'o}mez, Alberto and Nugent, Kimberly M and Gibson, James B and Cogn{\'e}, Benjamin and Lupski, James R and Stessman, Holly A F and Eichler, Evan E and Retterer, Kyle and Yang, Yaping and Redon, Richard and Katsanis, Nicholas and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Kloetzel, Peter-Michael and Golzio, Christelle and B{\'e}zieau, St{\'e}phane and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Isidor, Bertrand} } @article {369, title = {Haploinsufficiency of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase gene TRIP12 causes intellectual disability with or without autism spectrum disorders, speech delay, and dysmorphic features.}, journal = {Hum Genet}, volume = {136}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 04}, pages = {377-386}, abstract = {

Impairment of ubiquitin-proteasome system activity involving ubiquitin ligase genes UBE3A, UBE3B, and HUWE1 and deubiquitinating enzyme genes USP7 and USP9X has been reported in patients with neurodevelopmental delays. To date, only a handful of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy-number variants (CNVs) involving TRIP12, encoding a member of the HECT domain E3 ubiquitin ligases family on chromosome 2q36.3 have been reported. Using chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-exome sequencing (WES), we have identified, respectively, five deletion CNVs and four inactivating SNVs (two frameshifts, one missense, and one splicing) in TRIP12. Seven of these variants were found to be de novo; parental studies could not be completed in two families. Quantitative PCR analyses of the splicing mutation showed a dramatically decreased level of TRIP12 mRNA in the proband compared to the family controls, indicating a loss-of-function mechanism. The shared clinical features include intellectual disability with or without autistic spectrum disorders, speech delay, and facial dysmorphism. Our findings demonstrate that E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIP12 plays an important role in nervous system development and function. The nine presented pathogenic variants further document that TRIP12 haploinsufficiency causes a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder. Finally, our data enable expansion of the phenotypic spectrum of ubiquitin-proteasome dependent disorders.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Carrier Proteins, Child, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Facies, Female, Haploinsufficiency, Humans, Infant, Intellectual Disability, Language Development Disorders, Male, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases}, issn = {1432-1203}, doi = {10.1007/s00439-017-1763-1}, author = {Zhang, Jing and Gambin, Tomasz and Yuan, Bo and Szafranski, Przemyslaw and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Balwi, Mohammed Al and Alswaid, Abdulrahman and Al-Gazali, Lihadh and Shamsi, Aisha M Al and Komara, Makanko and Ali, Bassam R and Roeder, Elizabeth and McAuley, Laura and Roy, Daniel S and Manchester, David K and Magoulas, Pilar and King, Lauren E and Hannig, Vickie and Bonneau, Dominique and Denomm{\'e}-Pichon, Anne-Sophie and Charif, Majida and Besnard, Thomas and B{\'e}zieau, St{\'e}phane and Cogn{\'e}, Benjamin and Andrieux, Joris and Zhu, Wenmiao and He, Weimin and Vetrini, Francesco and Ward, Patricia A and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bi, Weimin and Eng, Christine M and Lupski, James R and Yang, Yaping and Patel, Ankita and Lalani, Seema R and Xia, Fan and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {376, title = {Identification of novel candidate disease genes from de novo exonic copy number variants.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {9}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 09 21}, pages = {83}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Exon-targeted microarrays can detect small (<1000~bp) intragenic copy number variants (CNVs), including those that affect only a single exon. This genome-wide high-sensitivity approach increases the molecular diagnosis for conditions with known disease-associated genes, enables better genotype-phenotype correlations, and facilitates variant allele detection allowing novel disease gene discovery.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 63,127 patients referred for clinical chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) at Baylor Genetics laboratories, including 46,755 individuals tested using exon-targeted arrays, from 2007 to 2017. Small CNVs harboring a single gene or two to five non-disease-associated genes were identified; the genes involved were evaluated for a potential disease association.

RESULTS: In this clinical population, among rare CNVs involving any single gene reported in 7200 patients (11\%), we identified 145 de novo autosomal CNVs (117 losses and 28 intragenic gains), 257 X-linked deletion CNVs in males, and 1049 inherited autosomal CNVs (878 losses and 171 intragenic gains); 111 known disease genes were potentially disrupted by de novo autosomal or X-linked (in males) single-gene CNVs. Ninety-one genes, either recently proposed as candidate disease genes or not yet associated with diseases, were disrupted by 147 single-gene CNVs, including 37 de novo deletions and ten de novo intragenic duplications on autosomes and 100 X-linked CNVs in males. Clinical features in individuals with de novo or X-linked CNVs encompassing at most five genes (224~bp to 1.6~Mb in size) were compared to those in individuals with larger-sized deletions (up to 5~Mb in size) in the internal CMA database or loss-of-function single nucleotide variants (SNVs) detected by clinical or research whole-exome sequencing (WES). This enabled the identification of recently published genes (BPTF, NONO, PSMD12, TANGO2, and TRIP12), novel candidate disease genes (ARGLU1 and STK3), and further confirmation of disease association for two recently proposed disease genes (MEIS2 and PTCHD1). Notably, exon-targeted CMA detected several pathogenic single-exon CNVs missed by clinical WES analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data document the efficacy of exon-targeted CMA for detection of genic and exonic CNVs, complementing and extending WES in clinical diagnostics, and the potential for discovery of novel disease genes by genome-wide assay.

}, keywords = {Cohort Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exons, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Homeodomain Proteins, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Membrane Proteins, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases, Retrospective Studies, Transcription Factors, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-017-0472-7}, author = {Gambin, Tomasz and Yuan, Bo and Bi, Weimin and Liu, Pengfei and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Pursley, Amber N and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Marom, Ronit and Golla, Sailaja and Dengle, Lauren and Petrie, Heather G and Matalon, Reuben and Emrick, Lisa and Proud, Monica B and Treadwell-Deering, Diane and Chao, Hsiao-Tuan and Koillinen, Hannele and Brown, Chester and Urraca, Nora and Mostafavi, Roya and Bernes, Saunder and Roeder, Elizabeth R and Nugent, Kimberly M and Bader, Patricia I and Bellus, Gary and Cummings, Michael and Northrup, Hope and Ashfaq, Myla and Westman, Rachel and Wildin, Robert and Beck, Anita E and Immken, LaDonna and Elton, Lindsay and Varghese, Shaun and Buchanan, Edward and Faivre, Laurence and Lefebvre, Mathilde and Schaaf, Christian P and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Yang, Yaping and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Breman, Amy M and Smith, Janice L and Cheung, Sau Wai and Lupski, James R and Patel, Ankita and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {357, title = {Lessons learned from additional research analyses of unsolved clinical exome cases.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {9}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 03 21}, pages = {26}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Given the rarity of most single-gene Mendelian disorders, concerted efforts of data exchange between clinical and scientific communities are critical to optimize molecular diagnosis and novel disease gene discovery.

METHODS: We designed and implemented protocols for the study of cases for which a plausible molecular diagnosis was not achieved in a clinical genomics diagnostic laboratory (i.e. unsolved clinical exomes). Such cases were recruited to a research laboratory for further analyses, in order to potentially: (1) accelerate novel disease gene discovery; (2) increase the molecular diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing (WES); and (3) gain insight into the genetic mechanisms of disease. Pilot project data included 74 families, consisting mostly of parent-offspring trios. Analyses performed on a research basis employed both WES from additional family members and complementary bioinformatics approaches and protocols.

RESULTS: Analysis of all possible modes of Mendelian inheritance, focusing on both single nucleotide variants (SNV) and copy number variant (CNV) alleles, yielded a likely contributory variant in 36\% (27/74) of cases. If one includes candidate genes with variants identified within a single family, a potential contributory variant was identified in a total of ~51\% (38/74) of cases enrolled in this pilot study. The molecular diagnosis was achieved in 30/63 trios (47.6\%). Besides this, the analysis workflow yielded evidence for pathogenic variants in disease-associated genes in 4/6 singleton cases (66.6\%), 1/1 multiplex family involving three affected siblings, and 3/4 (75\%) quartet families. Both the analytical pipeline and the collaborative efforts between the diagnostic and research laboratories provided insights that allowed recent disease gene discoveries (PURA, TANGO2, EMC1, GNB5, ATAD3A, and MIPEP) and increased the number of novel genes, defined in this study as genes identified in more than one family (DHX30 and EBF3).

CONCLUSION: An efficient genomics pipeline in which clinical sequencing in a diagnostic laboratory is followed by the detailed reanalysis of unsolved cases in a research environment, supplemented with WES data from additional family members, and subject to adjuvant bioinformatics analyses including relaxed variant filtering parameters in informatics pipelines, can enhance the molecular diagnostic yield and provide mechanistic insights into Mendelian disorders. Implementing these approaches requires collaborative clinical molecular diagnostic and research efforts.

}, keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities, Computational Biology, DNA Copy Number Variations, DNA-Binding Proteins, Exome, Female, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, GTP-Binding Protein beta Subunits, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Metalloendopeptidases, Mitochondrial Proteins, Pilot Projects, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-017-0412-6}, author = {Eldomery, Mohammad K and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Harel, Tamar and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Gambin, Tomasz and Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and K{\"u}ry, S{\'e}bastien and Mercier, Sandra and Lessel, Davor and Denecke, Jonas and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Penney, Samantha and Liu, Pengfei and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Schaaf, Christian P and Wangler, Michael F and Bacino, Carlos A and Lewis, Richard Alan and Potocki, Lorraine and Graham, Brett H and Belmont, John W and Scaglia, Fernando and Orange, Jordan S and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Chiang, Theodore and Doddapaneni, Harsha and Hu, Jianhong and Muzny, Donna M and Xia, Fan and Beaudet, Arthur L and Boerwinkle, Eric and Eng, Christine M and Plon, Sharon E and Sutton, V Reid and Gibbs, Richard A and Posey, Jennifer E and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R} } @article {170, title = {Alu-mediated diverse and complex pathogenic copy-number variants within human chromosome 17 at p13.3.}, journal = {Hum Mol Genet}, volume = {24}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul 15}, pages = {4061-77}, abstract = {

Alu repetitive elements are known to be major contributors to genome instability by generating Alu-mediated copy-number variants (CNVs). Most of the reported Alu-mediated CNVs are simple deletions and duplications, and the mechanism underlying Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangement has been attributed to non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Chromosome 17 at the p13.3 genomic region lacks extensive low-copy repeat architecture; however, it is highly enriched for Alu repetitive elements, with a fraction of 30\% of total sequence annotated in the human reference genome, compared with the 10\% genome-wide and 18\% on chromosome 17. We conducted mechanistic studies of the 17p13.3 CNVs by performing high-density oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization, specifically interrogating the 17p13.3 region with \~{}150 bp per probe density; CNV breakpoint junctions were mapped to nucleotide resolution by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Studied rearrangements include 5 interstitial deletions, 14 tandem duplications, 7 terminal deletions and 13 complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs). Within the 17p13.3 region, Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangements were identified in 80\% of the interstitial deletions, 46\% of the tandem duplications and 50\% of the CGRs, indicating that this mechanism was a major contributor for formation of breakpoint junctions. Our studies suggest that Alu repetitive elements facilitate formation of non-recurrent CNVs, CGRs and other structural aberrations of chromosome 17 at p13.3. The common observation of Alu-mediated rearrangement in CGRs and breakpoint junction sequences analysis further demonstrates that this type of mechanism is unlikely attributed to NAHR, but rather may be due to a recombination-coupled DNA replicative repair process.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Alu Elements, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gene Duplication, Gene Rearrangement, Genome, Human, Genomic Instability, Genomics, Homologous Recombination, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Segmental Duplications, Genomic, Sequence Deletion}, issn = {1460-2083}, doi = {10.1093/hmg/ddv146}, author = {Gu, Shen and Yuan, Bo and Campbell, Ian M and Beck, Christine R and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Patel, Ankita and Bacino, Carlos A and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bi, Weimin and Lupski, James R} } @article {229, title = {Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Aug 07}, pages = {173-82}, abstract = {

New human mutations are thought to originate in germ cells, thus making a recurrence of the same mutation in a sibling exceedingly rare. However, increasing sensitivity of genomic technologies has anecdotally revealed mosaicism for mutations in somatic tissues of apparently healthy parents. Such somatically mosaic parents might also have germline mosaicism that can potentially cause unexpected intergenerational recurrences. Here, we show that somatic mosaicism for transmitted mutations among parents of children with simplex genetic disease is more common than currently appreciated. Using the sensitivity of individual-specific breakpoint PCR, we prospectively screened 100 families with children affected by genomic disorders due to rare deletion copy-number variants (CNVs) determined to be de novo by clinical analysis of parental DNA. Surprisingly, we identified four cases of low-level somatic mosaicism for the transmitted CNV in DNA isolated from parental blood. Integrated probabilistic modeling of gametogenesis developed in response to our observations predicts that mutations in parental blood increase recurrence risk substantially more than parental mutations confined to the germline. Moreover, despite the fact that maternally transmitted mutations are the minority of alleles, our model suggests that sexual dimorphisms in gametogenesis result in a greater proportion of somatically mosaic transmitting mothers who are thus at increased risk of recurrence. Therefore, somatic mosaicism together with sexual differences in gametogenesis might explain a considerable fraction of unexpected recurrences of X-linked recessive disease. Overall, our results underscore an important role for somatic mosaicism and mitotic replicative mutational mechanisms in transmission genetics.

}, keywords = {Cell Division, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Mosaicism, Mutation, Pedigree, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk, Sex Characteristics, Smith-Magenis Syndrome}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.003}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Yuan, Bo and Robberecht, Caroline and Pfundt, Rolph and Szafranski, Przemyslaw and McEntagart, Meriel E and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Bartnik, Magdalena and Wi{\'s}niowiecka-Kowalnik, Barbara and Plunkett, Katie S and Pursley, Amber N and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Vast, Mala and Marks, Karen and Patton, Michael and Olofsson, Peter and Patel, Ankita and Veltman, Joris A and Cheung, Sau Wai and Shaw, Chad A and Vissers, Lisenka E L M and Vermeesch, Joris R and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {301, title = {Deletions of recessive disease genes: CNV contribution to carrier states and disease-causing alleles.}, journal = {Genome Res}, volume = {23}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Sep}, pages = {1383-94}, abstract = {

Over 1200 recessive disease genes have been described in humans. The prevalence, allelic architecture, and per-genome load of pathogenic alleles in these genes remain to be fully elucidated, as does the contribution of DNA copy-number variants (CNVs) to carrier status and recessive disease. We mined CNV data from 21,470 individuals obtained by array-comparative genomic hybridization in a clinical diagnostic setting to identify deletions encompassing or disrupting recessive disease genes. We identified 3212 heterozygous potential carrier deletions affecting 419 unique recessive disease genes. Deletion frequency of these genes ranged from one occurrence to 1.5\%. When compared with recessive disease genes never deleted in our cohort, the 419 recessive disease genes affected by at least one carrier deletion were longer and located farther from known dominant disease genes, suggesting that the formation and/or prevalence of carrier CNVs may be affected by both local and adjacent genomic features and by selection. Some subjects had multiple carrier CNVs (307 subjects) and/or carrier deletions encompassing more than one recessive disease gene (206 deletions). Heterozygous deletions spanning multiple recessive disease genes may confer carrier status for multiple single-gene disorders, for complex syndromes resulting from the combination of two or more recessive conditions, or may potentially cause clinical phenotypes due to a multiply heterozygous state. In addition to carrier mutations, we identified homozygous and hemizygous deletions potentially causative for recessive disease. We provide further evidence that CNVs contribute to the allelic architecture of both carrier and recessive disease-causing mutations. Thus, a complete recessive carrier screening method or diagnostic test should detect CNV alleles.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Databases, Genetic, DNA Copy Number Variations, Gene Deletion, Gene Frequency, Genes, Dominant, Genes, Recessive, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Homozygote, Humans}, issn = {1549-5469}, doi = {10.1101/gr.156075.113}, author = {Boone, Philip M and Campbell, Ian M and Baggett, Brett C and Soens, Zachry T and Rao, Mitchell M and Hixson, Patricia M and Patel, Ankita and Bi, Weimin and Cheung, Sau Wai and Lalani, Seema R and Beaudet, Arthur L and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Shaw, Chad A and Lupski, James R} }