@article {998, title = {CSNK2B: A broad spectrum of neurodevelopmental disability and epilepsy severity.}, journal = {Epilepsia}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 May 26}, abstract = {

CSNK2B has recently been implicated as a disease gene for neurodevelopmental disability (NDD) and epilepsy. Information about developmental outcomes has been limited by the young age and short follow-up for many of the previously reported cases, and further delineation of the spectrum of associated phenotypes is needed. We present 25 new patients with variants in CSNK2B and refine the associated NDD and epilepsy phenotypes. CSNK2B variants were identified by research or clinical exome sequencing, and investigators from different centers were connected via GeneMatcher. Most individuals had developmental delay and generalized epilepsy with onset in the first 2 years. However, we found a broad spectrum of phenotypic severity, ranging from early normal development with pharmacoresponsive seizures to profound intellectual disability with intractable epilepsy and recurrent refractory status epilepticus. These findings suggest that CSNK2B should be considered in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with a broad range of NDD with treatable or intractable seizures.

}, issn = {1528-1167}, doi = {10.1111/epi.16931}, author = {Ernst, Michelle E and Baugh, Evan H and Thomas, Amanda and Bier, Louise and Lippa, Natalie and Stong, Nicholas and Mulhern, Maureen S and Kushary, Sulagna and Akman, Cigdem I and Heinzen, Erin L and Yeh, Raymond and Bi, Weimin and Hanchard, Neil A and Burrage, Lindsay C and Leduc, Magalie S and Chong, Josephine S C and Bend, Renee and Lyons, Michael J and Lee, Jennifer A and Suwannarat, Pim and Brilstra, Eva and Simon, Marleen and Koopmans, Marije and van Binsbergen, Ellen and Groepper, Daniel and Fleischer, Julie and Nava, Caroline and Keren, Boris and Mignot, Cyril and Mathieu, Sophie and Mancini, Grazia M S and Madan-Khetarpal, Suneeta and Infante, Elena M and Bluvstein, Judith and Seeley, Andrea and Bachman, Kristine and Klee, Eric W and Schultz-Rogers, Laura E and Hasadsri, Linda and Barnett, Sarah and Ellingson, Marissa S and Ferber, Matthew J and Narayanan, Vinodh and Ramsey, Keri and Rauch, Anita and Joset, Pascal and Steindl, Katharina and Sheehan, Theodore and Poduri, Annapurna and Vasquez, Alejandra and Ruivenkamp, Claudia and White, Susan M and Pais, Lynn and Monaghan, Kristin G and Goldstein, David B and Sands, Tristan T and Aggarwal, Vimla} } @article {782, title = {CNVs cause autosomal recessive genetic diseases with or without involvement of SNV/indels.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {22}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {1633-1641}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Improved resolution of molecular diagnostic technologies enabled detection of smaller sized exonic level copy-number variants (CNVs). The contribution of CNVs to autosomal recessive (AR) conditions may be better recognized using a large clinical cohort.

METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the CNVs{\textquoteright} contribution to AR conditions in cases subjected to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA, N = ~70,000) and/or clinical exome sequencing (ES, N = ~12,000) at Baylor Genetics; most had pediatric onset neurodevelopmental disorders.

RESULTS: CNVs contributed to biallelic variations in 87 cases, including 81 singletons and three affected sibling pairs. Seventy cases had CNVs affecting both alleles, and 17 had a CNV and a single-nucleotide variant (SNV)/indel in trans. In total, 94.3\% of AR-CNVs affected one gene; among these 41.4\% were single-exon and 35.0\% were multiexon partial-gene events. Sixty-nine percent of homozygous AR-CNVs were embedded in homozygous genomic intervals. Five cases had large deletions unmasking an SNV/indel on the intact allele for a recessive condition, resulting in multiple molecular diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS: AR-CNVs are often smaller in size, transmitted through generations, and underrecognized due to limitations in clinical CNV detection methods. Our findings from a large clinical cohort emphasized integrated CNV and SNV/indel analyses for precise clinical and molecular diagnosis especially in the context of genomic disorders.

}, keywords = {Child, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exons, Humans, INDEL Mutation, Retrospective Studies, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/s41436-020-0864-8}, author = {Yuan, Bo and Wang, Lei and Liu, Pengfei and Shaw, Chad and Dai, Hongzheng and Cooper, Lance and Zhu, Wenmiao and Anderson, Stephanie A and Meng, Linyan and Wang, Xia and Wang, Yue and Xia, Fan and Xiao, Rui and Braxton, Alicia and Peacock, Sandra and Schmitt, Eric and Ward, Patricia A and Vetrini, Francesco and He, Weimin and Chiang, Theodore and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Breman, Amy M and Smith, Janice and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bacino, Carlos A and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R and Bi, Weimin} } @article {792, title = {Quantitative Assessment of Parental Somatic Mosaicism for Copy-Number Variant (CNV) Deletions.}, journal = {Curr Protoc Hum Genet}, volume = {106}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 06}, pages = {e99}, abstract = {

As genome sequencing methodologies have become more sensitive in detecting low-frequency rare-variant events, the link between post-zygotic mutagenesis and somatic mosaicism in the etiology of several human genetic conditions other than cancers has become more clear. Given that current clinical-genomics diagnostic methods have limited detection sensitivity for mosaic events, a copy-number variant (CNV) deletion inherited from a parent with low-level (<10\%) mosaicism can be erroneously interpreted in the proband to represent a de novo germline event. Here, we describe three sensitive, precise, and cost-efficient methods that can quantitatively assess the potential degree of parental somatic mosaicism levels for CNV deletions: droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), PCR amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), and quantitative PCR. ddPCR using the EvaGreen fluorescent dye protocol can specifically quantify the deleted or non-deleted alleles by analyzing the number of droplets positive for a fluorescent signal for each event. PCR amplicon-based NGS assesses the allele frequencies of a heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphism within a deletion region. The difference in number of reads between the two genotypes indicates the level of somatic mosaicism for the CNV deletion. Quantitative PCR can be applied where the relative quantity of the deletion junction-specific product represents the level of mosaicism. Clinical implementation of these quantitative variant-detection methods enables potentially more accurate assessment of disease recurrence risk in family-based genetic counseling, allowing couples to engage in more informed family planning. {\textcopyright} 2020 by John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) Alternate Protocol 1: PCR amplicon-based next-generation sequencing Alternate Protocol 2: Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

}, keywords = {DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Mosaicism, Parents, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction}, issn = {1934-8258}, doi = {10.1002/cphg.99}, author = {Liu, Qian and Grochowski, Christopher M and Bi, Weimin and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {588, title = {Atlas-CNV: a validated approach to call single-exon CNVs in the eMERGESeq gene panel.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {21}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 09}, pages = {2135-2144}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: To provide a validated method to confidently identify exon-containing copy-number variants (CNVs), with a low false discovery rate (FDR), in targeted sequencing data from a clinical laboratory with particular focus on single-exon CNVs.

METHODS: DNA sequence coverage data are normalized within each sample and subsequently exonic CNVs are identified in a batch of samples, when the target log ratio of the sample to the batch median exceeds defined thresholds. The quality of exonic CNV calls is assessed by C-scores (Z-like scores) using thresholds derived from gold standard samples and simulation studies. We integrate an ExonQC threshold to lower FDR and compare performance with alternate software (VisCap).

RESULTS: Thirteen CNVs were used as a truth set to validate Atlas-CNV and compared with VisCap. We demonstrated FDR reduction in validation, simulation, and 10,926 eMERGESeq samples without sensitivity loss. Sixty-four multiexon and 29 single-exon CNVs with high C-scores were assessed by~Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA).

CONCLUSION: Atlas-CNV is validated as a method to identify exonic CNVs in targeted sequencing data generated in the clinical laboratory. The ExonQC and C-score assignment can reduce FDR (identification of targets with high variance) and improve calling accuracy of single-exon CNVs respectively. We propose guidelines and criteria to identify high confidence single-exon CNVs.

}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/s41436-019-0475-4}, author = {Chiang, Theodore and Liu, Xiuping and Wu, Tsung-Jung and Hu, Jianhong and Sedlazeck, Fritz J and White, Simon and Schaid, Daniel and Andrade, Mariza de and Jarvik, Gail P and Crosslin, David and Stanaway, Ian and Carrell, David S and Connolly, John J and Hakonarson, Hakon and Groopman, Emily E and Gharavi, Ali G and Fedotov, Alexander and Bi, Weimin and Leduc, Magalie S and Murdock, David R and Jiang, Yunyun and Meng, Linyan and Eng, Christine M and Wen, Shu and Yang, Yaping and Muzny, Donna M and Boerwinkle, Eric and Salerno, William and Venner, Eric and Gibbs, Richard A} } @article {593, title = {Bi-allelic Variants in TONSL Cause SPONASTRIME Dysplasia and a Spectrum of Skeletal Dysplasia Phenotypes.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {104}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 03 07}, pages = {422-438}, abstract = {

SPONASTRIME dysplasia is an autosomal-recessive spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia characterized by spine (spondylar) abnormalities, midface hypoplasia with a depressed nasal bridge, metaphyseal striations, and disproportionate short stature. Scoliosis, coxa vara, childhood cataracts, short dental roots, and hypogammaglobulinemia have also been reported in this disorder. Although an autosomal-recessive~inheritance pattern has been hypothesized, pathogenic variants in a specific gene have not been discovered in individuals with SPONASTRIME dysplasia. Here, we identified bi-allelic variants in TONSL, which encodes the Tonsoku-like DNA repair protein, in nine subjects (from eight families) with SPONASTRIME dysplasia, and four subjects (from three families) with short stature of varied severity and spondylometaphyseal dysplasia with or without immunologic and hematologic abnormalities, but no definitive metaphyseal striations at diagnosis. The finding of early embryonic lethality in a Tonsl murine model and the discovery of reduced length, spinal abnormalities, reduced numbers of neutrophils, and early lethality in a tonsl zebrafish model both support the hypomorphic nature of the identified TONSL variants. Moreover, functional studies revealed increased amounts of spontaneous replication fork stalling and chromosomal aberrations, as well as fewer camptothecin (CPT)-induced RAD51 foci in subject-derived cell lines. Importantly, these cellular defects were rescued upon re-expression of wild-type (WT) TONSL; this rescue is consistent with the hypothesis that hypomorphic TONSL variants are pathogenic. Overall, our studies in humans, mice, zebrafish, and subject-derived cell lines confirm that pathogenic variants in TONSL impair DNA replication and homologous recombination-dependent repair processes, and they lead to a spectrum of skeletal dysplasia phenotypes with numerous extra-skeletal manifestations.

}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.01.007}, author = {Burrage, Lindsay C and Reynolds, John J and Baratang, Nissan Vida and Phillips, Jennifer B and Wegner, Jeremy and McFarquhar, Ashley and Higgs, Martin R and Christiansen, Audrey E and Lanza, Denise G and Seavitt, John R and Jain, Mahim and Li, Xiaohui and Parry, David A and Raman, Vandana and Chitayat, David and Chinn, Ivan K and Bertuch, Alison A and Karaviti, Lefkothea and Schlesinger, Alan E and Earl, Dawn and Bamshad, Michael and Savarirayan, Ravi and Doddapaneni, Harsha and Muzny, Donna and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Eng, Christine M and Gibbs, Richard A and Bi, Weimin and Emrick, Lisa and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Postlethwait, John and Westerfield, Monte and Dickinson, Mary E and Beaudet, Arthur L and Ranza, Emmanuelle and Huber, Celine and Cormier-Daire, Val{\'e}rie and Shen, Wei and Mao, Rong and Heaney, Jason D and Orange, Jordan S and Bertola, D{\'e}bora and Yamamoto, Guilherme L and Baratela, Wagner A R and Butler, Merlin G and Ali, Asim and Adeli, Mehdi and Cohn, Daniel H and Krakow, Deborah and Jackson, Andrew P and Lees, Melissa and Offiah, Amaka C and Carlston, Colleen M and Carey, John C and Stewart, Grant S and Bacino, Carlos A and Campeau, Philippe M and Lee, Brendan} } @article {515, title = {Clinical exome sequencing reveals locus heterogeneity and phenotypic variability of cohesinopathies.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {21}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 03}, pages = {663-675}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Defects in the cohesin pathway are associated with cohesinopathies, notably Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS). We aimed to delineate pathogenic variants~in known and candidate cohesinopathy genes from a clinical exome perspective.

METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients referred for clinical exome sequencing (CES, N = 10,698). Patients with causative variants in novel or recently described cohesinopathy genes were enrolled for phenotypic characterization.

RESULTS: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic single-nucleotide and insertion/deletion variants (SNVs/indels) were identified in established disease genes including NIPBL (N = 5), SMC1A (N = 14), SMC3 (N = 4), RAD21 (N = 2), and HDAC8 (N = 8). The phenotypes in this genetically defined cohort skew towards the mild end of CdLS spectrum as compared with phenotype-driven cohorts. Candidate or recently reported cohesinopathy genes were supported by de novo SNVs/indels in STAG1 (N = 3), STAG2 (N = 5), PDS5A (N = 1), and WAPL (N = 1), and one inherited SNV in PDS5A. We also identified copy-number deletions affecting STAG1 (two de novo, one of unknown inheritance) and STAG2 (one of unknown inheritance). Patients with STAG1 and STAG2 variants presented with overlapping features yet without characteristic facial features of CdLS.

CONCLUSION: CES effectively identified disease-causing alleles at the mild end of the cohensinopathy spectrum and enabled characterization of candidate disease genes.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Alleles, Antigens, Nuclear, Biological Variation, Population, Carrier Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, Child, Child, Preschool, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Cohort Studies, De Lange Syndrome, Exome, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetic Heterogeneity, Humans, INDEL Mutation, Male, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/s41436-018-0085-6}, author = {Yuan, Bo and Neira, Juanita and Pehlivan, Davut and Santiago-Sim, Teresa and Song, Xiaofei and Rosenfeld, Jill and Posey, Jennifer E and Patel, Vipulkumar and Jin, Weihong and Adam, Margaret P and Baple, Emma L and Dean, John and Fong, Chin-To and Hickey, Scott E and Hudgins, Louanne and Leon, Eyby and Madan-Khetarpal, Suneeta and Rawlins, Lettie and Rustad, Cecilie F and Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and Tveten, Kristian and Wenger, Olivia and Diaz, Jullianne and Jenkins, Laura and Martin, Laura and McGuire, Marianne and Pietryga, Marguerite and Ramsdell, Linda and Slattery, Leah and Abid, Farida and Bertuch, Alison A and Grange, Dorothy and Immken, LaDonna and Schaaf, Christian P and Van Esch, Hilde and Bi, Weimin and Cheung, Sau Wai and Breman, Amy M and Smith, Janice L and Shaw, Chad and Crosby, Andrew H and Eng, Christine and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R and Xiao, Rui and Liu, Pengfei} } @article {663, title = {Copy number variant and runs of homozygosity detection by microarrays enabled more precise molecular diagnoses in 11,020 clinical exome cases.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {11}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 05 17}, pages = {30}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Exome sequencing (ES) has been successfully applied in clinical detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small indels. However, identification of copy number variants (CNVs) using ES data remains challenging. The purpose of this study is to understand the contribution of CNVs and copy neutral runs of homozygosity (ROH) in molecular diagnosis of patients referred for ES.

METHODS: In a cohort of 11,020 consecutive ES patients, an Illumina SNP array analysis interrogating mostly coding SNPs was performed as a quality control (QC) measurement and for CNV/ROH detection. Among these patients, clinical chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed at Baylor Genetics (BG) on 3229 patients, either before, concurrently, or after ES. We retrospectively analyzed the findings from CMA and the QC array.

RESULTS: The QC array can detect ~ 70\% of pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (PCNVs) detectable by CMA. Out of the 11,020 ES cases, the QC array identified PCNVs in 327 patients and uniparental disomy (UPD) disorder-related ROH in 10 patients. The overall PCNV/UPD detection rate was 5.9\% in the 3229 ES patients who also had CMA at BG; PCNV/UPD detection rate was higher in concurrent ES and CMA than in ES with prior CMA (7.2\% vs 4.6\%). The PCNVs/UPD contributed to the molecular diagnoses in 17.4\%~(189/1089) of molecularly diagnosed ES cases with CMA and~were estimated to contribute in 10.6\% of all molecularly diagnosed ES cases. Dual diagnoses with both PCNVs and SNVs were detected in 38 patients. PCNVs affecting single recessive disorder genes in a compound heterozygous state with SNVs were detected in 4 patients, and homozygous deletions~(mostly exonic deletions) were detected in 17 patients. A higher PCNV detection rate was observed for patients with syndromic phenotypes and/or cardiovascular abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical genomics study demonstrates that detection of PCNV/UPD through the QC array or CMA increases ES diagnostic rate, provides more precise molecular diagnosis for dominant as well as recessive traits, and enables more complete genetic diagnoses in patients with dual or multiple molecular diagnoses. Concurrent ES and CMA using an array with exonic coverage for disease genes enables most effective detection of both CNVs and SNVs and therefore is recommended especially in time-sensitive clinical situations.

}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-019-0639-5}, author = {Dharmadhikari, Avinash V and Ghosh, Rajarshi and Yuan, Bo and Liu, Pengfei and Dai, Hongzheng and Al Masri, Sami and Scull, Jennifer and Posey, Jennifer E and Jiang, Allen H and He, Weimin and Vetrini, Francesco and Braxton, Alicia A and Ward, Patricia and Chiang, Theodore and Qu, Chunjing and Gu, Shen and Shaw, Chad A and Smith, Janice L and Lalani, Seema and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Cheung, Sau-Wai and Bacino, Carlos A and Patel, Ankita and Breman, Amy M and Wang, Xia and Meng, Linyan and Xiao, Rui and Xia, Fan and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Eng, Christine M and Lupski, James R and Yang, Yaping and Bi, Weimin} } @article {580, title = {De novo and inherited TCF20 pathogenic variants are associated with intellectual disability, dysmorphic features, hypotonia, and neurological impairments with similarities to Smith-Magenis syndrome.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {11}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 02 28}, pages = {12}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Neurodevelopmental disorders are genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous encompassing developmental delay (DD), intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), structural brain abnormalities, and neurological manifestations with variants in a large number of genes (hundreds) associated. To date, a few de novo mutations potentially disrupting TCF20 function in patients with ID, ASD, and hypotonia have been reported. TCF20 encodes a transcriptional co-regulator structurally related to RAI1, the dosage-sensitive gene responsible for Smith-Magenis syndrome (deletion/haploinsufficiency) and Potocki-Lupski syndrome (duplication/triplosensitivity).

METHODS: Genome-wide analyses by exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) identified individuals with heterozygous, likely damaging, loss-of-function alleles in TCF20. We implemented further molecular and clinical analyses to determine the inheritance of the pathogenic variant alleles and studied the spectrum of phenotypes.

RESULTS: We report 25 unique inactivating single nucleotide variants/indels (1 missense, 1 canonical splice-site variant, 18 frameshift, and 5 nonsense) and 4 deletions of TCF20. The pathogenic variants were detected in 32 patients and 4 affected parents from 31 unrelated families. Among cases with available parental samples, the variants were de novo in 20 instances and inherited from 4 symptomatic parents in 5, including in one set of monozygotic twins. Two pathogenic loss-of-function variants were recurrent in unrelated families. Patients presented with a phenotype characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, hypotonia, variable dysmorphic features, movement disorders, and sleep disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS: TCF20 pathogenic variants are associated with a novel syndrome manifesting clinical characteristics similar to those observed in Smith-Magenis syndrome. Together with previously described cases, the clinical entity of TCF20-associated neurodevelopmental disorders (TAND) emerges from a genotype-driven perspective.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Craniofacial Abnormalities, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Humans, INDEL Mutation, Infant, Intellectual Disability, Male, Muscle Hypotonia, Smith-Magenis Syndrome, Transcription Factors, Young Adult}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-019-0623-0}, author = {Vetrini, Francesco and McKee, Shane and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Suri, Mohnish and Lewis, Andrea M and Nugent, Kimberly Margaret and Roeder, Elizabeth and Littlejohn, Rebecca O and Holder, Sue and Zhu, Wenmiao and Alaimo, Joseph T and Graham, Brett and Harris, Jill M and Gibson, James B and Pastore, Matthew and McBride, Kim L and Komara, Makanko and Al-Gazali, Lihadh and Al Shamsi, Aisha and Fanning, Elizabeth A and Wierenga, Klaas J and Scott, Daryl A and Ben-Neriah, Ziva and Meiner, Vardiella and Cassuto, Hanoch and Elpeleg, Orly and Holder, J Lloyd and Burrage, Lindsay C and Seaver, Laurie H and Van Maldergem, Lionel and Mahida, Sonal and Soul, Janet S and Marlatt, Margaret and Matyakhina, Ludmila and Vogt, Julie and Gold, June-Anne and Park, Soo-Mi and Varghese, Vinod and Lampe, Anne K and Kumar, Ajith and Lees, Melissa and Holder-Espinasse, Muriel and McConnell, Vivienne and Bernhard, Birgitta and Blair, Ed and Harrison, Victoria and Muzny, Donna M and Gibbs, Richard A and Elsea, Sarah H and Posey, Jennifer E and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema and Xia, Fan and Yang, Yaping and Eng, Christine M and Lupski, James R and Liu, Pengfei} } @article {673, title = {Reanalysis of Clinical Exome Sequencing Data.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {380}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 06 20}, pages = {2478-2480}, keywords = {Exome, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Testing, Humans, Mutation, Phenotype, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMc1812033}, author = {Liu, Pengfei and Meng, Linyan and Normand, Elizabeth A and Xia, Fan and Song, Xiaofei and Ghazi, Andrew and Rosenfeld, Jill and Magoulas, Pilar L and Braxton, Alicia and Ward, Patricia and Dai, Hongzheng and Yuan, Bo and Bi, Weimin and Xiao, Rui and Wang, Xia and Chiang, Theodore and Vetrini, Francesco and He, Weimin and Cheng, Hanyin and Dong, Jie and Gijavanekar, Charul and Benke, Paul J and Bernstein, Jonathan A and Eble, Tanya and Eroglu, Yasemen and Erwin, Deanna and Escobar, Luis and Gibson, James B and Gripp, Karen and Kleppe, Soledad and Koenig, Mary K and Lewis, Andrea M and Natowicz, Marvin and Mancias, Pedro and Minor, LaKeesha and Scaglia, Fernando and Schaaf, Christian P and Streff, Haley and Vernon, Hilary and Uhles, Crescenda L and Zackai, Elaine H and Wu, Nan and Sutton, V Reid and Beaudet, Arthur L and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Posey, Jennifer E and Lalani, Seema and Shaw, Chad and Eng, Christine M and Lupski, James R and Yang, Yaping} } @article {506, title = {Phenotypic expansion in - a common cause of intellectual disability in females.}, journal = {Ann Clin Transl Neurol}, volume = {5}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Oct}, pages = {1277-1285}, abstract = {

De variants in account for 1-3\% of unexplained intellectual disability (ID) cases and are amongst the most common causes of ID especially in females. Forty-seven patients (44 females, 3 males) have been described. We identified 31 additional individuals carrying 29 unique variants, including 30 postnatal individuals with complex clinical presentations of developmental delay or ID, and one fetus with abnormal ultrasound findings. Rare or novel phenotypes observed include respiratory problems, congenital heart disease, skeletal muscle mitochondrial DNA depletion, and late-onset neurologic decline. Our findings expand the spectrum of DNA variants and phenotypes associated with disorders.

}, issn = {2328-9503}, doi = {10.1002/acn3.622}, author = {Wang, Xia and Posey, Jennifer E and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Bacino, Carlos A and Scaglia, Fernando and Immken, LaDonna and Harris, Jill M and Hickey, Scott E and Mosher, Theresa M and Slavotinek, Anne and Zhang, Jing and Beuten, Joke and Leduc, Magalie S and He, Weimin and Vetrini, Francesco and Walkiewicz, Magdalena A and Bi, Weimin and Xiao, Rui and Liu, Pengfei and Shao, Yunru and Gezdirici, Alper and Gulec, Elif Y and Jiang, Yunyun and Darilek, Sandra A and Hansen, Adam W and Khayat, Michael M and Pehlivan, Davut and Piard, Juliette and Muzny, Donna M and Hanchard, Neil and Belmont, John W and Van Maldergem, Lionel and Gibbs, Richard A and Eldomery, Mohammad K and Akdemir, Zeynep C and Adesina, Adekunle M and Chen, Shan and Lee, Yi-Chien and Lee, Brendan and Lupski, James R and Eng, Christine M and Xia, Fan and Yang, Yaping and Graham, Brett H and Moretti, Paolo} } @article {335, title = {De Novo Disruption of the Proteasome Regulatory Subunit PSMD12 Causes a Syndromic Neurodevelopmental Disorder.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {100}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Feb 02}, pages = {352-363}, abstract = {

Degradation of proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is an essential biological process in the development of eukaryotic organisms. Dysregulation of this mechanism leads to numerous human neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental disorders. Through a multi-center collaboration, we identified six de novo genomic deletions and four de novo point mutations involving PSMD12, encoding the non-ATPase subunit PSMD12 (aka RPN5) of the 19S regulator of 26S proteasome complex, in unrelated individuals with intellectual disability, congenital malformations, ophthalmologic anomalies, feeding difficulties, deafness, and subtle dysmorphic facial features. We observed reduced PSMD12 levels and an accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins without any impairment of proteasome catalytic activity. Our PSMD12 loss-of-function zebrafish CRISPR/Cas9 model exhibited microcephaly, decreased convolution of the renal tubules, and abnormal craniofacial morphology. Our data support the biological importance of PSMD12 as a scaffolding subunit in proteasome function during development and neurogenesis in particular; they enable the definition of a neurodevelopmental disorder due to PSMD12 variants, expanding the phenotypic spectrum of UPS-dependent disorders.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Disease Models, Animal, DNA Copy Number Variations, Down-Regulation, Female, Gene Deletion, Humans, Infant, Intellectual Disability, Male, Microcephaly, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Zebrafish}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.003}, author = {K{\"u}ry, S{\'e}bastien and Besnard, Thomas and Ebstein, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Khan, Tahir N and Gambin, Tomasz and Douglas, Jessica and Bacino, Carlos A and Craigen, William J and Sanders, Stephan J and Lehmann, Andrea and Latypova, X{\'e}nia and Khan, Kamal and Pacault, Mathilde and Sacharow, Stephanie and Glaser, Kimberly and Bieth, Eric and Perrin-Sabourin, Laurence and Jacquemont, Marie-Line and Cho, Megan T and Roeder, Elizabeth and Denomm{\'e}-Pichon, Anne-Sophie and Monaghan, Kristin G and Yuan, Bo and Xia, Fan and Simon, Sylvain and Bonneau, Dominique and Parent, Philippe and Gilbert-Dussardier, Brigitte and Odent, Sylvie and Toutain, Annick and Pasquier, Laurent and Barbouth, Deborah and Shaw, Chad A and Patel, Ankita and Smith, Janice L and Bi, Weimin and Schmitt, S{\'e}bastien and Deb, Wallid and Nizon, Mathilde and Mercier, Sandra and Vincent, Marie and Rooryck, Caroline and Malan, Val{\'e}rie and Brice{\~n}o, Ignacio and G{\'o}mez, Alberto and Nugent, Kimberly M and Gibson, James B and Cogn{\'e}, Benjamin and Lupski, James R and Stessman, Holly A F and Eichler, Evan E and Retterer, Kyle and Yang, Yaping and Redon, Richard and Katsanis, Nicholas and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Kloetzel, Peter-Michael and Golzio, Christelle and B{\'e}zieau, St{\'e}phane and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Isidor, Bertrand} } @article {369, title = {Haploinsufficiency of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase gene TRIP12 causes intellectual disability with or without autism spectrum disorders, speech delay, and dysmorphic features.}, journal = {Hum Genet}, volume = {136}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 04}, pages = {377-386}, abstract = {

Impairment of ubiquitin-proteasome system activity involving ubiquitin ligase genes UBE3A, UBE3B, and HUWE1 and deubiquitinating enzyme genes USP7 and USP9X has been reported in patients with neurodevelopmental delays. To date, only a handful of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy-number variants (CNVs) involving TRIP12, encoding a member of the HECT domain E3 ubiquitin ligases family on chromosome 2q36.3 have been reported. Using chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-exome sequencing (WES), we have identified, respectively, five deletion CNVs and four inactivating SNVs (two frameshifts, one missense, and one splicing) in TRIP12. Seven of these variants were found to be de novo; parental studies could not be completed in two families. Quantitative PCR analyses of the splicing mutation showed a dramatically decreased level of TRIP12 mRNA in the proband compared to the family controls, indicating a loss-of-function mechanism. The shared clinical features include intellectual disability with or without autistic spectrum disorders, speech delay, and facial dysmorphism. Our findings demonstrate that E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIP12 plays an important role in nervous system development and function. The nine presented pathogenic variants further document that TRIP12 haploinsufficiency causes a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder. Finally, our data enable expansion of the phenotypic spectrum of ubiquitin-proteasome dependent disorders.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Carrier Proteins, Child, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Facies, Female, Haploinsufficiency, Humans, Infant, Intellectual Disability, Language Development Disorders, Male, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases}, issn = {1432-1203}, doi = {10.1007/s00439-017-1763-1}, author = {Zhang, Jing and Gambin, Tomasz and Yuan, Bo and Szafranski, Przemyslaw and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Balwi, Mohammed Al and Alswaid, Abdulrahman and Al-Gazali, Lihadh and Shamsi, Aisha M Al and Komara, Makanko and Ali, Bassam R and Roeder, Elizabeth and McAuley, Laura and Roy, Daniel S and Manchester, David K and Magoulas, Pilar and King, Lauren E and Hannig, Vickie and Bonneau, Dominique and Denomm{\'e}-Pichon, Anne-Sophie and Charif, Majida and Besnard, Thomas and B{\'e}zieau, St{\'e}phane and Cogn{\'e}, Benjamin and Andrieux, Joris and Zhu, Wenmiao and He, Weimin and Vetrini, Francesco and Ward, Patricia A and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bi, Weimin and Eng, Christine M and Lupski, James R and Yang, Yaping and Patel, Ankita and Lalani, Seema R and Xia, Fan and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {453, title = {High Rate of Recurrent De Novo Mutations in Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {101}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Nov 02}, pages = {664-685}, abstract = {

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) is a group of conditions characterized by the co-occurrence of epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID), typically with developmental plateauing or regression associated with frequent epileptiform activity. The cause of DEE remains unknown in the majority of cases. We performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in 197 individuals with unexplained DEE and pharmaco-resistant seizures and in their unaffected parents. We focused our attention on de novo mutations (DNMs) and identified candidate genes containing such variants. We sought to identify additional subjects with DNMs in these genes by performing targeted sequencing in another series of individuals with DEE and by mining various sequencing datasets. We also performed meta-analyses to document enrichment of DNMs in candidate genes by leveraging our WGS dataset with those of several DEE and ID series. By combining these strategies, we were able to provide a causal link between DEE and the following genes: NTRK2, GABRB2, CLTC, DHDDS, NUS1, RAB11A, GABBR2, and SNAP25. Overall, we established a molecular diagnosis in 63/197 (32\%) individuals in our WGS series. The main cause of DEE in these individuals was de novo point mutations (53/63 solved cases), followed by inherited mutations (6/63 solved cases) and de novo CNVs (4/63 solved cases). De novo missense variants explained a larger proportion of individuals in our series than in other series that were primarily ascertained because of ID. Moreover, these DNMs were more frequently recurrent than those identified in ID series. These observations indicate that the genetic landscape of DEE might be different from that of ID without epilepsy.

}, keywords = {Brain Diseases, Child, Child, Preschool, Epilepsy, Female, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Male, Mutation, Recurrence, Seizures}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.09.008}, author = {Hamdan, Fadi F and Myers, Candace T and Cossette, Patrick and Lemay, Philippe and Spiegelman, Dan and Laporte, Alexandre Dionne and Nassif, Christina and Diallo, Ousmane and Monlong, Jean and Cadieux-Dion, Maxime and Dobrzeniecka, Sylvia and Meloche, Caroline and Retterer, Kyle and Cho, Megan T and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Bi, Weimin and Massicotte, Christine and Miguet, Marguerite and Brunga, Ledia and Regan, Brigid M and Mo, Kelly and Tam, Cory and Schneider, Amy and Hollingsworth, Georgie and FitzPatrick, David R and Donaldson, Alan and Canham, Natalie and Blair, Edward and Kerr, Bronwyn and Fry, Andrew E and Thomas, Rhys H and Shelagh, Joss and Hurst, Jane A and Brittain, Helen and Blyth, Moira and Lebel, Robert Roger and Gerkes, Erica H and Davis-Keppen, Laura and Stein, Quinn and Chung, Wendy K and Dorison, Sara J and Benke, Paul J and Fassi, Emily and Corsten-Janssen, Nicole and Kamsteeg, Erik-Jan and Mau-Them, Frederic T and Bruel, Ange-Line and Verloes, Alain and {\~O}unap, Katrin and Wojcik, Monica H and Albert, Dara V F and Venkateswaran, Sunita and Ware, Tyson and Jones, Dean and Liu, Yu-Chi and Mohammad, Shekeeb S and Bizargity, Peyman and Bacino, Carlos A and Leuzzi, Vincenzo and Martinelli, Simone and Dallapiccola, Bruno and Tartaglia, Marco and Blumkin, Lubov and Wierenga, Klaas J and Purcarin, Gabriela and O{\textquoteright}Byrne, James J and Stockler, Sylvia and Lehman, Anna and Keren, Boris and Nougues, Marie-Christine and Mignot, Cyril and Auvin, St{\'e}phane and Nava, Caroline and Hiatt, Susan M and Bebin, Martina and Shao, Yunru and Scaglia, Fernando and Lalani, Seema R and Frye, Richard E and Jarjour, Imad T and Jacques, St{\'e}phanie and Boucher, Renee-Myriam and Riou, Emilie and Srour, Myriam and Carmant, Lionel and Lortie, Anne and Major, Philippe and Diadori, Paola and Dubeau, Fran{\c c}ois and D{\textquoteright}Anjou, Guy and Bourque, Guillaume and Berkovic, Samuel F and Sadleir, Lynette G and Campeau, Philippe M and Kibar, Zoha and Lafreni{\`e}re, Ronald G and Girard, Simon L and Mercimek-Mahmutoglu, Saadet and Boelman, Cyrus and Rouleau, Guy A and Scheffer, Ingrid E and Mefford, Heather C and Andrade, Danielle M and Rossignol, Elsa and Minassian, Berge A and Michaud, Jacques L} } @article {376, title = {Identification of novel candidate disease genes from de novo exonic copy number variants.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {9}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 09 21}, pages = {83}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Exon-targeted microarrays can detect small (<1000~bp) intragenic copy number variants (CNVs), including those that affect only a single exon. This genome-wide high-sensitivity approach increases the molecular diagnosis for conditions with known disease-associated genes, enables better genotype-phenotype correlations, and facilitates variant allele detection allowing novel disease gene discovery.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 63,127 patients referred for clinical chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) at Baylor Genetics laboratories, including 46,755 individuals tested using exon-targeted arrays, from 2007 to 2017. Small CNVs harboring a single gene or two to five non-disease-associated genes were identified; the genes involved were evaluated for a potential disease association.

RESULTS: In this clinical population, among rare CNVs involving any single gene reported in 7200 patients (11\%), we identified 145 de novo autosomal CNVs (117 losses and 28 intragenic gains), 257 X-linked deletion CNVs in males, and 1049 inherited autosomal CNVs (878 losses and 171 intragenic gains); 111 known disease genes were potentially disrupted by de novo autosomal or X-linked (in males) single-gene CNVs. Ninety-one genes, either recently proposed as candidate disease genes or not yet associated with diseases, were disrupted by 147 single-gene CNVs, including 37 de novo deletions and ten de novo intragenic duplications on autosomes and 100 X-linked CNVs in males. Clinical features in individuals with de novo or X-linked CNVs encompassing at most five genes (224~bp to 1.6~Mb in size) were compared to those in individuals with larger-sized deletions (up to 5~Mb in size) in the internal CMA database or loss-of-function single nucleotide variants (SNVs) detected by clinical or research whole-exome sequencing (WES). This enabled the identification of recently published genes (BPTF, NONO, PSMD12, TANGO2, and TRIP12), novel candidate disease genes (ARGLU1 and STK3), and further confirmation of disease association for two recently proposed disease genes (MEIS2 and PTCHD1). Notably, exon-targeted CMA detected several pathogenic single-exon CNVs missed by clinical WES analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data document the efficacy of exon-targeted CMA for detection of genic and exonic CNVs, complementing and extending WES in clinical diagnostics, and the potential for discovery of novel disease genes by genome-wide assay.

}, keywords = {Cohort Studies, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exons, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Homeodomain Proteins, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Membrane Proteins, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases, Retrospective Studies, Transcription Factors, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-017-0472-7}, author = {Gambin, Tomasz and Yuan, Bo and Bi, Weimin and Liu, Pengfei and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Pursley, Amber N and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Marom, Ronit and Golla, Sailaja and Dengle, Lauren and Petrie, Heather G and Matalon, Reuben and Emrick, Lisa and Proud, Monica B and Treadwell-Deering, Diane and Chao, Hsiao-Tuan and Koillinen, Hannele and Brown, Chester and Urraca, Nora and Mostafavi, Roya and Bernes, Saunder and Roeder, Elizabeth R and Nugent, Kimberly M and Bader, Patricia I and Bellus, Gary and Cummings, Michael and Northrup, Hope and Ashfaq, Myla and Westman, Rachel and Wildin, Robert and Beck, Anita E and Immken, LaDonna and Elton, Lindsay and Varghese, Shaun and Buchanan, Edward and Faivre, Laurence and Lefebvre, Mathilde and Schaaf, Christian P and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Yang, Yaping and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Beaudet, Arthur L and Breman, Amy M and Smith, Janice L and Cheung, Sau Wai and Lupski, James R and Patel, Ankita and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {357, title = {Lessons learned from additional research analyses of unsolved clinical exome cases.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {9}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 03 21}, pages = {26}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Given the rarity of most single-gene Mendelian disorders, concerted efforts of data exchange between clinical and scientific communities are critical to optimize molecular diagnosis and novel disease gene discovery.

METHODS: We designed and implemented protocols for the study of cases for which a plausible molecular diagnosis was not achieved in a clinical genomics diagnostic laboratory (i.e. unsolved clinical exomes). Such cases were recruited to a research laboratory for further analyses, in order to potentially: (1) accelerate novel disease gene discovery; (2) increase the molecular diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing (WES); and (3) gain insight into the genetic mechanisms of disease. Pilot project data included 74 families, consisting mostly of parent-offspring trios. Analyses performed on a research basis employed both WES from additional family members and complementary bioinformatics approaches and protocols.

RESULTS: Analysis of all possible modes of Mendelian inheritance, focusing on both single nucleotide variants (SNV) and copy number variant (CNV) alleles, yielded a likely contributory variant in 36\% (27/74) of cases. If one includes candidate genes with variants identified within a single family, a potential contributory variant was identified in a total of ~51\% (38/74) of cases enrolled in this pilot study. The molecular diagnosis was achieved in 30/63 trios (47.6\%). Besides this, the analysis workflow yielded evidence for pathogenic variants in disease-associated genes in 4/6 singleton cases (66.6\%), 1/1 multiplex family involving three affected siblings, and 3/4 (75\%) quartet families. Both the analytical pipeline and the collaborative efforts between the diagnostic and research laboratories provided insights that allowed recent disease gene discoveries (PURA, TANGO2, EMC1, GNB5, ATAD3A, and MIPEP) and increased the number of novel genes, defined in this study as genes identified in more than one family (DHX30 and EBF3).

CONCLUSION: An efficient genomics pipeline in which clinical sequencing in a diagnostic laboratory is followed by the detailed reanalysis of unsolved cases in a research environment, supplemented with WES data from additional family members, and subject to adjuvant bioinformatics analyses including relaxed variant filtering parameters in informatics pipelines, can enhance the molecular diagnostic yield and provide mechanistic insights into Mendelian disorders. Implementing these approaches requires collaborative clinical molecular diagnostic and research efforts.

}, keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities, Computational Biology, DNA Copy Number Variations, DNA-Binding Proteins, Exome, Female, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, GTP-Binding Protein beta Subunits, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Metalloendopeptidases, Mitochondrial Proteins, Pilot Projects, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-017-0412-6}, author = {Eldomery, Mohammad K and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Harel, Tamar and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Gambin, Tomasz and Stray-Pedersen, Asbj{\o}rg and K{\"u}ry, S{\'e}bastien and Mercier, Sandra and Lessel, Davor and Denecke, Jonas and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Penney, Samantha and Liu, Pengfei and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Schaaf, Christian P and Wangler, Michael F and Bacino, Carlos A and Lewis, Richard Alan and Potocki, Lorraine and Graham, Brett H and Belmont, John W and Scaglia, Fernando and Orange, Jordan S and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Chiang, Theodore and Doddapaneni, Harsha and Hu, Jianhong and Muzny, Donna M and Xia, Fan and Beaudet, Arthur L and Boerwinkle, Eric and Eng, Christine M and Plon, Sharon E and Sutton, V Reid and Gibbs, Richard A and Posey, Jennifer E and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R} } @article {339, title = {Resolution of Disease Phenotypes Resulting from Multilocus Genomic Variation.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {376}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 01 05}, pages = {21-31}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Whole-exome sequencing can provide insight into the relationship between observed clinical phenotypes and underlying genotypes.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a series of 7374 consecutive unrelated patients who had been referred to a clinical diagnostic laboratory for whole-exome sequencing; our goal was to determine the frequency and clinical characteristics of patients for whom more than one molecular diagnosis was reported. The phenotypic similarity between molecularly diagnosed pairs of diseases was calculated with the use of terms from the Human Phenotype Ontology.

RESULTS: A molecular diagnosis was rendered for 2076 of 7374 patients (28.2\%); among these patients, 101 (4.9\%) had diagnoses that involved two or more disease loci. We also analyzed parental samples, when available, and found that de novo variants accounted for 67.8\% (61 of 90) of pathogenic variants in autosomal dominant disease genes and 51.7\% (15 of 29) of pathogenic variants in X-linked disease genes; both variants were de novo in 44.7\% (17 of 38) of patients with two monoallelic variants. Causal copy-number variants were found in 12 patients (11.9\%) with multiple diagnoses. Phenotypic similarity scores were significantly lower among patients in whom the phenotype resulted from two distinct mendelian disorders that affected different organ systems (50 patients) than among patients with disorders that had overlapping phenotypic features (30 patients) (median score, 0.21 vs. 0.36; P=1.77{\texttimes}10).

CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found multiple molecular diagnoses in 4.9\% of cases in which whole-exome sequencing was informative. Our results show that structured clinical ontologies can be used to determine the degree of overlap between two mendelian diseases in the same patient; the diseases can be distinct or overlapping. Distinct disease phenotypes affect different organ systems, whereas overlapping disease phenotypes are more likely to be caused by two genes encoding proteins that interact within the same pathway. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Foundation.).

}, keywords = {Exome, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Variation, Genotyping Techniques, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Phenotype, Retrospective Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMoa1516767}, author = {Posey, Jennifer E and Harel, Tamar and Liu, Pengfei and Rosenfeld, Jill A and James, Regis A and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Bi, Weimin and Xiao, Rui and Ding, Yan and Xia, Fan and Beaudet, Arthur L and Muzny, Donna M and Gibbs, Richard A and Boerwinkle, Eric and Eng, Christine M and Sutton, V Reid and Shaw, Chad A and Plon, Sharon E and Yang, Yaping and Lupski, James R} } @article {540, title = {Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management.}, journal = {JAMA Pediatr}, volume = {171}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 12 04}, pages = {e173438}, abstract = {

Importance: While congenital malformations and genetic diseases are a leading cause of early infant death, to our knowledge, the contribution of single-gene disorders in this group is undetermined.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield and use of clinical exome sequencing in critically ill infants.

Design, Setting, and Participants: Clinical exome sequencing was performed for 278 unrelated infants within the first 100 days of life who were admitted to Texas Children{\textquoteright}s Hospital in Houston, Texas, during a 5-year period between December 2011 and January 2017. Exome sequencing types included proband exome, trio exome, and critical trio exome, a rapid genomic assay for seriously ill infants.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Indications for testing, diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing, turnaround time, molecular findings, patient age at diagnosis, and effect on medical management among a group of critically ill infants who were suspected to have genetic disorders.

Results: The mean (SEM) age for infants participating in the study was 28.5 (1.7) days; of these, the mean (SEM) age was 29.0 (2.2) days for infants undergoing proband exome sequencing, 31.5 (3.9) days for trio exome, and 22.7 (3.9) days for critical trio exome. Clinical indications for exome sequencing included a range of medical concerns. Overall, a molecular diagnosis was achieved in 102 infants (36.7\%) by clinical exome sequencing, with relatively low yield for cardiovascular abnormalities. The diagnosis affected medical management for 53 infants (52.0\%) and had a substantial effect on informed redirection of care, initiation of new subspecialist care, medication/dietary modifications, and furthering life-saving procedures in select patients. Critical trio exome sequencing revealed a molecular diagnosis in 32 of 63 infants (50.8\%) at a mean (SEM) of 33.1 (5.6) days of life with a mean (SEM) turnaround time of 13.0 (0.4) days. Clinical care was altered by the diagnosis in 23 of 32 patients (71.9\%). The diagnostic yield, patient age at diagnosis, and medical effect in the group that underwent critical trio exome sequencing were significantly different compared with the group who underwent regular exome testing. For deceased infants (n = 81), genetic disorders were molecularly diagnosed in 39 (48.1\%) by exome sequencing, with implications for recurrence risk counseling.

Conclusions and Relevance: Exome sequencing is a powerful tool for the diagnostic evaluation of critically ill infants with suspected monogenic disorders in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units and its use has a notable effect on clinical decision making.

}, keywords = {Adult, Critical Care, Disease Management, Exome, Genetic Counseling, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Humans, Infant, Infant Care, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Length of Stay, Retrospective Studies, Texas, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {2168-6211}, doi = {10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438}, author = {Meng, Linyan and Pammi, Mohan and Saronwala, Anirudh and Magoulas, Pilar and Ghazi, Andrew Ray and Vetrini, Francesco and Zhang, Jing and He, Weimin and Dharmadhikari, Avinash V and Qu, Chunjing and Ward, Patricia and Braxton, Alicia and Narayanan, Swetha and Ge, Xiaoyan and Tokita, Mari J and Santiago-Sim, Teresa and Dai, Hongzheng and Chiang, Theodore and Smith, Hadley and Azamian, Mahshid S and Robak, Laurie and Bostwick, Bret L and Schaaf, Christian P and Potocki, Lorraine and Scaglia, Fernando and Bacino, Carlos A and Hanchard, Neil A and Wangler, Michael F and Scott, Daryl and Brown, Chester and Hu, Jianhong and Belmont, John W and Burrage, Lindsay C and Graham, Brett H and Sutton, Vernon Reid and Craigen, William J and Plon, Sharon E and Lupski, James R and Beaudet, Arthur L and Gibbs, Richard A and Muzny, Donna M and Miller, Marcus J and Wang, Xia and Leduc, Magalie S and Xiao, Rui and Liu, Pengfei and Shaw, Chad and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Bi, Weimin and Xia, Fan and Lee, Brendan and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Lalani, Seema R} } @article {9, title = {Identification of a RAI1-associated disease network through integration of exome sequencing, transcriptomics, and 3D genomics.}, journal = {Genome Med}, volume = {8}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Nov 01}, pages = {105}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) is a developmental disability/multiple congenital anomaly disorder resulting from haploinsufficiency of RAI1. It is characterized by distinctive facial features, brachydactyly, sleep disturbances, and stereotypic behaviors.

METHODS: We investigated a cohort of 15 individuals with a clinical suspicion of SMS who showed neither deletion in the SMS critical region nor damaging variants in RAI1 using whole exome sequencing. A combination of network analysis (co-expression and biomedical text mining), transcriptomics, and circularized chromatin conformation capture (4C-seq) was applied to verify whether modified genes are part of the same disease network as known SMS-causing genes.

RESULTS: Potentially deleterious variants were identified in nine of these individuals using whole-exome sequencing. Eight of these changes affect KMT2D, ZEB2, MAP2K2, GLDC, CASK, MECP2, KDM5C, and POGZ, known to be associated with Kabuki syndrome 1, Mowat-Wilson syndrome, cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, glycine encephalopathy, mental retardation and microcephaly with pontine and cerebellar hypoplasia, X-linked mental retardation 13, X-linked mental retardation Claes-Jensen type, and White-Sutton syndrome, respectively. The ninth individual carries a de novo variant in JAKMIP1, a regulator of neuronal translation that was recently found deleted in a patient with autism spectrum disorder. Analyses of co-expression and biomedical text mining suggest that these pathologies and SMS are part of the same disease network. Further support for this hypothesis was obtained from transcriptome profiling that showed that the expression levels of both Zeb2 and Map2k2 are perturbed in Rai1 mice. As an orthogonal approach to potentially contributory disease gene variants, we used chromatin conformation capture to reveal chromatin contacts between RAI1 and the loci flanking ZEB2 and GLDC, as well as between RAI1 and human orthologs of the genes that show perturbed expression in our Rai1 mouse model.

CONCLUSIONS: These holistic studies of RAI1 and its interactions allow insights into SMS and other disorders associated with intellectual disability and behavioral abnormalities. Our findings support a pan-genomic approach to the molecular diagnosis of a distinctive disorder.

}, keywords = {Animals, Embryo, Mammalian, Exome, Female, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genomics, Humans, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Knockout, Mutation, Phenotype, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA, Messenger, Smith-Magenis Syndrome, Trans-Activators, Transcription Factors, Transcriptome}, issn = {1756-994X}, doi = {10.1186/s13073-016-0359-z}, author = {Loviglio, Maria Nicla and Beck, Christine R and White, Janson J and Leleu, Marion and Harel, Tamar and Guex, Nicolas and Niknejad, Anne and Bi, Weimin and Chen, Edward S and Crespo, Isaac and Yan, Jiong and Charng, Wu-Lin and Gu, Shen and Fang, Ping and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Shaw, Chad A and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Muzny, Donna M and Gibbs, Richard A and Rougemont, Jacques and Xenarios, Ioannis and Lupski, James R and Reymond, Alexandre} } @article {170, title = {Alu-mediated diverse and complex pathogenic copy-number variants within human chromosome 17 at p13.3.}, journal = {Hum Mol Genet}, volume = {24}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul 15}, pages = {4061-77}, abstract = {

Alu repetitive elements are known to be major contributors to genome instability by generating Alu-mediated copy-number variants (CNVs). Most of the reported Alu-mediated CNVs are simple deletions and duplications, and the mechanism underlying Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangement has been attributed to non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Chromosome 17 at the p13.3 genomic region lacks extensive low-copy repeat architecture; however, it is highly enriched for Alu repetitive elements, with a fraction of 30\% of total sequence annotated in the human reference genome, compared with the 10\% genome-wide and 18\% on chromosome 17. We conducted mechanistic studies of the 17p13.3 CNVs by performing high-density oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization, specifically interrogating the 17p13.3 region with \~{}150 bp per probe density; CNV breakpoint junctions were mapped to nucleotide resolution by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Studied rearrangements include 5 interstitial deletions, 14 tandem duplications, 7 terminal deletions and 13 complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs). Within the 17p13.3 region, Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangements were identified in 80\% of the interstitial deletions, 46\% of the tandem duplications and 50\% of the CGRs, indicating that this mechanism was a major contributor for formation of breakpoint junctions. Our studies suggest that Alu repetitive elements facilitate formation of non-recurrent CNVs, CGRs and other structural aberrations of chromosome 17 at p13.3. The common observation of Alu-mediated rearrangement in CGRs and breakpoint junction sequences analysis further demonstrates that this type of mechanism is unlikely attributed to NAHR, but rather may be due to a recombination-coupled DNA replicative repair process.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Alu Elements, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gene Duplication, Gene Rearrangement, Genome, Human, Genomic Instability, Genomics, Homologous Recombination, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Segmental Duplications, Genomic, Sequence Deletion}, issn = {1460-2083}, doi = {10.1093/hmg/ddv146}, author = {Gu, Shen and Yuan, Bo and Campbell, Ian M and Beck, Christine R and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Patel, Ankita and Bacino, Carlos A and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bi, Weimin and Lupski, James R} } @article {229, title = {Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Aug 07}, pages = {173-82}, abstract = {

New human mutations are thought to originate in germ cells, thus making a recurrence of the same mutation in a sibling exceedingly rare. However, increasing sensitivity of genomic technologies has anecdotally revealed mosaicism for mutations in somatic tissues of apparently healthy parents. Such somatically mosaic parents might also have germline mosaicism that can potentially cause unexpected intergenerational recurrences. Here, we show that somatic mosaicism for transmitted mutations among parents of children with simplex genetic disease is more common than currently appreciated. Using the sensitivity of individual-specific breakpoint PCR, we prospectively screened 100 families with children affected by genomic disorders due to rare deletion copy-number variants (CNVs) determined to be de novo by clinical analysis of parental DNA. Surprisingly, we identified four cases of low-level somatic mosaicism for the transmitted CNV in DNA isolated from parental blood. Integrated probabilistic modeling of gametogenesis developed in response to our observations predicts that mutations in parental blood increase recurrence risk substantially more than parental mutations confined to the germline. Moreover, despite the fact that maternally transmitted mutations are the minority of alleles, our model suggests that sexual dimorphisms in gametogenesis result in a greater proportion of somatically mosaic transmitting mothers who are thus at increased risk of recurrence. Therefore, somatic mosaicism together with sexual differences in gametogenesis might explain a considerable fraction of unexpected recurrences of X-linked recessive disease. Overall, our results underscore an important role for somatic mosaicism and mitotic replicative mutational mechanisms in transmission genetics.

}, keywords = {Cell Division, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Mosaicism, Mutation, Pedigree, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk, Sex Characteristics, Smith-Magenis Syndrome}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.003}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Yuan, Bo and Robberecht, Caroline and Pfundt, Rolph and Szafranski, Przemyslaw and McEntagart, Meriel E and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Bartnik, Magdalena and Wi{\'s}niowiecka-Kowalnik, Barbara and Plunkett, Katie S and Pursley, Amber N and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Vast, Mala and Marks, Karen and Patton, Michael and Olofsson, Peter and Patel, Ankita and Veltman, Joris A and Cheung, Sau Wai and Shaw, Chad A and Vissers, Lisenka E L M and Vermeesch, Joris R and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {301, title = {Deletions of recessive disease genes: CNV contribution to carrier states and disease-causing alleles.}, journal = {Genome Res}, volume = {23}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Sep}, pages = {1383-94}, abstract = {

Over 1200 recessive disease genes have been described in humans. The prevalence, allelic architecture, and per-genome load of pathogenic alleles in these genes remain to be fully elucidated, as does the contribution of DNA copy-number variants (CNVs) to carrier status and recessive disease. We mined CNV data from 21,470 individuals obtained by array-comparative genomic hybridization in a clinical diagnostic setting to identify deletions encompassing or disrupting recessive disease genes. We identified 3212 heterozygous potential carrier deletions affecting 419 unique recessive disease genes. Deletion frequency of these genes ranged from one occurrence to 1.5\%. When compared with recessive disease genes never deleted in our cohort, the 419 recessive disease genes affected by at least one carrier deletion were longer and located farther from known dominant disease genes, suggesting that the formation and/or prevalence of carrier CNVs may be affected by both local and adjacent genomic features and by selection. Some subjects had multiple carrier CNVs (307 subjects) and/or carrier deletions encompassing more than one recessive disease gene (206 deletions). Heterozygous deletions spanning multiple recessive disease genes may confer carrier status for multiple single-gene disorders, for complex syndromes resulting from the combination of two or more recessive conditions, or may potentially cause clinical phenotypes due to a multiply heterozygous state. In addition to carrier mutations, we identified homozygous and hemizygous deletions potentially causative for recessive disease. We provide further evidence that CNVs contribute to the allelic architecture of both carrier and recessive disease-causing mutations. Thus, a complete recessive carrier screening method or diagnostic test should detect CNV alleles.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Databases, Genetic, DNA Copy Number Variations, Gene Deletion, Gene Frequency, Genes, Dominant, Genes, Recessive, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Homozygote, Humans}, issn = {1549-5469}, doi = {10.1101/gr.156075.113}, author = {Boone, Philip M and Campbell, Ian M and Baggett, Brett C and Soens, Zachry T and Rao, Mitchell M and Hixson, Patricia M and Patel, Ankita and Bi, Weimin and Cheung, Sau Wai and Lalani, Seema R and Beaudet, Arthur L and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Shaw, Chad A and Lupski, James R} }