@article {627, title = {Genetic counselors on the frontline of precision health.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet}, volume = {178}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Mar}, pages = {5-9}, abstract = {

By enabling precise genetic diagnosis and treatment there is great potential for inexpensive, accurate, and widely accessible genomic information to transform health care and improve the general well-being of virtually every person. To maximize this potential, approaches to genetic counseling and the role of genetic counselors will need to adapt to fit changing clinical and commercial needs worldwide. This will require overcoming multiple challenges including an inadequate workforce; development and implementation of alternate models of service delivery; integration of new technologies to improve, extend, and expand services; and support for equitable education and counseling among all populations. Genetic counselors are aptly poised to take on these challenges. The result will be better informed patients and families more capable of utilizing genetic information appropriately, making autonomous decisions about their care, and modifying their approach to disease risk to actively contribute to their health. The contributors to this issue of Seminars discuss how key areas of genetic counseling need to evolve and how genetic counselors can play a role in shaping the future of precision health.

}, issn = {1552-4876}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.c.31610}, author = {Bamshad, Michael J and Magoulas, Pilar L and Dent, Karin M} } @article {22, title = {My46: a Web-based tool for self-guided management of genomic test results in research and clinical settings.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {19}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr}, pages = {467-475}, abstract = {

A major challenge to implementing precision medicine is the need for an efficient and cost-effective strategy for returning individual genomic test results that is easily scalable and can be incorporated into multiple models of clinical practice. My46 is a Web-based tool for managing the return of genetic results that was designed and developed to support a wide range of approaches to disclosing results, ranging from traditional face-to-face disclosure to self-guided models. My46 has five key functions: set and modify results-return preferences, return results, educate, manage the return of results, and assess the return of results. These key functions are supported by six distinct modules and a suite of features that enhance the user experience, ease site navigation, facilitate knowledge sharing, and enable results-return tracking. My46 is a potentially effective solution for returning results and supports current trends toward shared decision making between patients and providers and patient-driven health management.Genet Med 19 4, 467-475.

}, keywords = {Biomedical Research, Computational Biology, Decision Making, Genomics, Humans, Internet, Medical Informatics, Patient Access to Records, Precision Medicine}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2016.133}, author = {Tabor, Holly K and Jamal, Seema M and Yu, Joon-Ho and Crouch, Julia M and Shankar, Aditi G and Dent, Karin M and Anderson, Nick and Miller, Damon A and Futral, Brett T and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {304, title = {Practices and policies of clinical exome sequencing providers: analysis and implications.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet A}, volume = {161A}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 May}, pages = {935-50}, abstract = {

Exome and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) offer potential advantages over traditional approaches to diagnostic genetic testing. Consequently, use of ES/WGS in clinical settings is rapidly becoming commonplace. Yet there are myriad moral, ethical, and perhaps legal implications attached to the use of ES and health care professionals and institutions will need to consider these implications in the context of the varied practices and policies of ES service providers. We developed "core elements" of content and procedures for informed consent, data sharing, and results management and a quantitative scale to assess the extent to which research protocols met the standards established by these core elements. We then used these tools to evaluate the practices and policies of each of the 6 U.S. CLIA-certified labs offering clinical ES. Approaches toward informed consent, data sharing, and results return vary widely among ES providers as do the overall potential merits and disadvantages of each, and more importantly, the balance between the two.

}, keywords = {Exome, Humans, Information Dissemination, Informed Consent, Morals, Organizational Policy, Practice Patterns, Physicians{\textquoteright}, Sequence Analysis, DNA, United States}, issn = {1552-4833}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.35942}, author = {Jamal, Seema M and Yu, Joon-Ho and Chong, Jessica X and Dent, Karin M and Conta, Jessie H and Tabor, Holly K and Bamshad, Michael J} }