@article {246, title = {Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet A}, volume = {164A}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Sep}, pages = {2153-60}, abstract = {

Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) present individuals with the opportunity to benefit from a broad scope of genetic results of clinical and personal utility. Yet, it is unclear which genetic results people want to receive (i.e., what type of genetic information they want to learn about themselves) or conversely not receive, and how they want to receive or manage results over time. Very little is known about whether and how attitudes toward receiving individual results from ES/WGS vary among racial/ethnic populations. We conducted 13 focus groups with a racially and ethnically diverse parent population (n = 76) to investigate attitudes toward return of individual results from WGS. We report on our findings for non-African American (non-AA) participants. Non-AA participants were primarily interested in genetic results on which they could act or "do something about." They defined "actionability" broadly to include individual medical treatment and disease prevention. The ability to plan for the future was both a motivation for and an expected benefit of receiving results. Their concerns focused on the meaning of results, specifically the potential inaccuracy and uncertainty of results. Non-AA participants expected healthcare providers to be involved in results management by helping them interpret results in the context of their own health and by providing counseling support. We compare and contrast these themes with those we previously reported from our analysis of African American (AA) perspectives to highlight the importance of varying preferences for results, characterize the central role of temporal orientation in framing expectations about the possibility of receiving ES/WGS results, and identify potential avenues by which genomic healthcare disparities may be inadvertently perpetuated.

}, keywords = {Adult, African Americans, Aged, Attitude to Health, Exome, Female, Focus Groups, Genome, Human, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1552-4833}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.36610}, author = {Yu, Joon-Ho and Crouch, Julia and Jamal, Seema M and Bamshad, Michael J and Tabor, Holly K} } @article {303, title = {Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet A}, volume = {161A}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 May}, pages = {1064-72}, abstract = {

Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) present patients and research participants with the opportunity to benefit from a broad scope of genetic results of clinical and personal utility. Yet, this potential for benefit also risks disenfranchising populations such as African Americans (AAs) that are already underrepresented in genetic research and utilize genetic tests at lower rates than other populations. Understanding a diverse range of perspectives on consenting for ES/WGS and receiving ES/WGS results is necessary to ensure parity in genomic health care and research. We conducted a series of 13 focus groups (n = 76) to investigate if and how attitudes toward participation in ES/WGS research and return of results from ES/WGS differ between self-described AAs and non-AAs. The majority of both AAs and non-AAs were willing to participate in WGS studies and receive individual genetic results, but the fraction not interested in either was higher in AAs. This is due in part to different expectations of health benefits from ES/WGS and how results should be managed. Our results underscore the need to develop and test culturally tailored strategies for returning ES/WGS results to AAs.

}, keywords = {Adult, African Americans, Aged, Attitude, Exome, Female, Focus Groups, Genetic Research, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Surveys and Questionnaires, Washington}, issn = {1552-4833}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.35914}, author = {Yu, Joon-Ho and Crouch, Julia and Jamal, Seema M and Tabor, Holly K and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {304, title = {Practices and policies of clinical exome sequencing providers: analysis and implications.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet A}, volume = {161A}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 May}, pages = {935-50}, abstract = {

Exome and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) offer potential advantages over traditional approaches to diagnostic genetic testing. Consequently, use of ES/WGS in clinical settings is rapidly becoming commonplace. Yet there are myriad moral, ethical, and perhaps legal implications attached to the use of ES and health care professionals and institutions will need to consider these implications in the context of the varied practices and policies of ES service providers. We developed "core elements" of content and procedures for informed consent, data sharing, and results management and a quantitative scale to assess the extent to which research protocols met the standards established by these core elements. We then used these tools to evaluate the practices and policies of each of the 6 U.S. CLIA-certified labs offering clinical ES. Approaches toward informed consent, data sharing, and results return vary widely among ES providers as do the overall potential merits and disadvantages of each, and more importantly, the balance between the two.

}, keywords = {Exome, Humans, Information Dissemination, Informed Consent, Morals, Organizational Policy, Practice Patterns, Physicians{\textquoteright}, Sequence Analysis, DNA, United States}, issn = {1552-4833}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.35942}, author = {Jamal, Seema M and Yu, Joon-Ho and Chong, Jessica X and Dent, Karin M and Conta, Jessie H and Tabor, Holly K and Bamshad, Michael J} }