@article {22, title = {My46: a Web-based tool for self-guided management of genomic test results in research and clinical settings.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {19}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr}, pages = {467-475}, abstract = {

A major challenge to implementing precision medicine is the need for an efficient and cost-effective strategy for returning individual genomic test results that is easily scalable and can be incorporated into multiple models of clinical practice. My46 is a Web-based tool for managing the return of genetic results that was designed and developed to support a wide range of approaches to disclosing results, ranging from traditional face-to-face disclosure to self-guided models. My46 has five key functions: set and modify results-return preferences, return results, educate, manage the return of results, and assess the return of results. These key functions are supported by six distinct modules and a suite of features that enhance the user experience, ease site navigation, facilitate knowledge sharing, and enable results-return tracking. My46 is a potentially effective solution for returning results and supports current trends toward shared decision making between patients and providers and patient-driven health management.Genet Med 19 4, 467-475.

}, keywords = {Biomedical Research, Computational Biology, Decision Making, Genomics, Humans, Internet, Medical Informatics, Patient Access to Records, Precision Medicine}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2016.133}, author = {Tabor, Holly K and Jamal, Seema M and Yu, Joon-Ho and Crouch, Julia M and Shankar, Aditi G and Dent, Karin M and Anderson, Nick and Miller, Damon A and Futral, Brett T and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {105, title = {Gene discovery for Mendelian conditions via social networking: de novo variants in KDM1A cause developmental delay and distinctive facial features.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {18}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 08}, pages = {788-95}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: The pace of Mendelian gene discovery is slowed by the "n-of-1 problem"-the difficulty of establishing the causality of a putatively pathogenic variant in a single person or family. Identification of an unrelated person with an overlapping phenotype and suspected pathogenic variant in the same gene can overcome this barrier, but it is often impeded by lack of a convenient or widely available way to share data on candidate variants/genes among families, clinicians, and researchers.

METHODS: Social networking among families, clinicians, and researchers was used to identify three children with variants of unknown significance in KDM1A and similar phenotypes.

RESULTS: De novo variants in KDM1A underlie a new syndrome characterized by developmental delay and distinctive facial features.

CONCLUSION: Social networking is a potentially powerful strategy to discover genes for rare Mendelian conditions, particularly those with nonspecific phenotypic features. To facilitate the efforts of families to share phenotypic and genomic information with each other, clinicians, and researchers, we developed the Repository for Mendelian Genomics Family Portal (RMD-FP; http://uwcmg.org/$\#$/family). Design and development of MyGene2 (http://www.mygene2.org), a Web-based tool that enables families, clinicians, and researchers to search for gene matches based on analysis of phenotype and exome data deposited into the RMD-FP, is under way.Genet Med 18 8, 788-795.

}, keywords = {Child, Child, Preschool, Databases, Factual, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Histone Demethylases, Humans, Information Dissemination, Male, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Social Networking, Web Browser}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2015.161}, author = {Chong, Jessica X and Yu, Joon-Ho and Lorentzen, Peter and Park, Karen M and Jamal, Seema M and Tabor, Holly K and Rauch, Anita and Saenz, Margarita Sifuentes and Boltshauser, Eugen and Patterson, Karynne E and Nickerson, Deborah A and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {238, title = {Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jul 03}, pages = {77-84}, abstract = {

Professional recommendations for the return of results from exome and whole-genome sequencing (ES/WGS) have been controversial. The lack of clear guidance about whether and, if so, how to return ES/WGS incidental results limits the extent to which individuals and families might benefit from ES/WGS. The perspectives of genetics professionals, particularly those at the forefront of using ES/WGS in clinics, are largely unknown. Data on stakeholder perspectives could help clarify how to weigh expert positions and recommendations. We conducted an online survey of 9,857 genetics professionals to learn their attitudes on the return of incidental results from ES/WGS and the recent American College of Medical Genetic and Genomics Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing. Of the 847 respondents, 760 completed the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents thought that incidental ES/WGS results should be offered to adult patients (85\%), healthy adults (75\%), and the parents of a child with a medical condition (74\%). The majority thought that incidental results about adult-onset conditions (62\%) and carrier status (62\%) should be offered to the parents of a child with a medical condition. About half thought that offered results should not be limited to those deemed clinically actionable. The vast majority (81\%) thought that individual preferences should guide return. Genetics professionals{\textquoteright} perspectives on the return of ES/WGS results differed substantially from current recommendations, underscoring the need to establish clear purpose for recommendations on the return of incidental ES/WGS results as professional societies grapple with developing and updating recommendations.

}, keywords = {Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Exome, Genetics, Medical, Genome, Human, Humans, Incidental Findings, Workforce}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.004}, author = {Yu, Joon-Ho and Harrell, Tanya M and Jamal, Seema M and Tabor, Holly K and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {246, title = {Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet A}, volume = {164A}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Sep}, pages = {2153-60}, abstract = {

Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) present individuals with the opportunity to benefit from a broad scope of genetic results of clinical and personal utility. Yet, it is unclear which genetic results people want to receive (i.e., what type of genetic information they want to learn about themselves) or conversely not receive, and how they want to receive or manage results over time. Very little is known about whether and how attitudes toward receiving individual results from ES/WGS vary among racial/ethnic populations. We conducted 13 focus groups with a racially and ethnically diverse parent population (n = 76) to investigate attitudes toward return of individual results from WGS. We report on our findings for non-African American (non-AA) participants. Non-AA participants were primarily interested in genetic results on which they could act or "do something about." They defined "actionability" broadly to include individual medical treatment and disease prevention. The ability to plan for the future was both a motivation for and an expected benefit of receiving results. Their concerns focused on the meaning of results, specifically the potential inaccuracy and uncertainty of results. Non-AA participants expected healthcare providers to be involved in results management by helping them interpret results in the context of their own health and by providing counseling support. We compare and contrast these themes with those we previously reported from our analysis of African American (AA) perspectives to highlight the importance of varying preferences for results, characterize the central role of temporal orientation in framing expectations about the possibility of receiving ES/WGS results, and identify potential avenues by which genomic healthcare disparities may be inadvertently perpetuated.

}, keywords = {Adult, African Americans, Aged, Attitude to Health, Exome, Female, Focus Groups, Genome, Human, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1552-4833}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.36610}, author = {Yu, Joon-Ho and Crouch, Julia and Jamal, Seema M and Bamshad, Michael J and Tabor, Holly K} } @article {303, title = {Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet A}, volume = {161A}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 May}, pages = {1064-72}, abstract = {

Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) present patients and research participants with the opportunity to benefit from a broad scope of genetic results of clinical and personal utility. Yet, this potential for benefit also risks disenfranchising populations such as African Americans (AAs) that are already underrepresented in genetic research and utilize genetic tests at lower rates than other populations. Understanding a diverse range of perspectives on consenting for ES/WGS and receiving ES/WGS results is necessary to ensure parity in genomic health care and research. We conducted a series of 13 focus groups (n = 76) to investigate if and how attitudes toward participation in ES/WGS research and return of results from ES/WGS differ between self-described AAs and non-AAs. The majority of both AAs and non-AAs were willing to participate in WGS studies and receive individual genetic results, but the fraction not interested in either was higher in AAs. This is due in part to different expectations of health benefits from ES/WGS and how results should be managed. Our results underscore the need to develop and test culturally tailored strategies for returning ES/WGS results to AAs.

}, keywords = {Adult, African Americans, Aged, Attitude, Exome, Female, Focus Groups, Genetic Research, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Surveys and Questionnaires, Washington}, issn = {1552-4833}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.35914}, author = {Yu, Joon-Ho and Crouch, Julia and Jamal, Seema M and Tabor, Holly K and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {304, title = {Practices and policies of clinical exome sequencing providers: analysis and implications.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet A}, volume = {161A}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 May}, pages = {935-50}, abstract = {

Exome and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) offer potential advantages over traditional approaches to diagnostic genetic testing. Consequently, use of ES/WGS in clinical settings is rapidly becoming commonplace. Yet there are myriad moral, ethical, and perhaps legal implications attached to the use of ES and health care professionals and institutions will need to consider these implications in the context of the varied practices and policies of ES service providers. We developed "core elements" of content and procedures for informed consent, data sharing, and results management and a quantitative scale to assess the extent to which research protocols met the standards established by these core elements. We then used these tools to evaluate the practices and policies of each of the 6 U.S. CLIA-certified labs offering clinical ES. Approaches toward informed consent, data sharing, and results return vary widely among ES providers as do the overall potential merits and disadvantages of each, and more importantly, the balance between the two.

}, keywords = {Exome, Humans, Information Dissemination, Informed Consent, Morals, Organizational Policy, Practice Patterns, Physicians{\textquoteright}, Sequence Analysis, DNA, United States}, issn = {1552-4833}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.35942}, author = {Jamal, Seema M and Yu, Joon-Ho and Chong, Jessica X and Dent, Karin M and Conta, Jessie H and Tabor, Holly K and Bamshad, Michael J} }