@article {19, title = {Whole-exome sequencing in the molecular diagnosis of individuals with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract and identification of a new causative gene.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {19}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr}, pages = {412-420}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: To investigate the utility of whole-exome sequencing (WES) to define a molecular diagnosis for patients clinically diagnosed with congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT).

METHODS: WES was performed in 62 families with CAKUT. WES data were analyzed for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in 35 known CAKUT genes, putatively deleterious sequence changes in new candidate genes, and potentially disease-associated copy-number variants (CNVs).

RESULTS: In approximately 5\% of families, pathogenic SNVs were identified in PAX2, HNF1B, and EYA1. Observed phenotypes in these families expand the current understanding about the role of these genes in CAKUT. Four pathogenic CNVs were also identified using two CNV detection tools. In addition, we found one deleterious de novo SNV in FOXP1 among the 62 families with CAKUT. The clinical database of the Baylor Miraca Genetics laboratory was queried and seven additional unrelated individuals with novel de novo SNVs in FOXP1 were identified. Six of these eight individuals with FOXP1 SNVs have syndromic urinary tract defects, implicating this gene in urinary tract development.

CONCLUSION: We conclude that WES can be used to identify molecular etiology (SNVs, CNVs) in a subset of individuals with CAKUT. WES can also help identify novel CAKUT genes.Genet Med 19 4, 412-420.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, DNA Copy Number Variations, Exome Sequencing, Female, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-beta, Humans, Infant, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Male, Nuclear Proteins, PAX2 Transcription Factor, Pedigree, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Repressor Proteins, Urogenital Abnormalities, Vesico-Ureteral Reflux, Young Adult}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2016.131}, author = {Bekheirnia, Mir Reza and Bekheirnia, Nasim and Bainbridge, Matthew N and Gu, Shen and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep Hande and Gambin, Tomek and Janzen, Nicolette K and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Muzny, Donna M and Michael, Mini and Brewer, Eileen D and Elenberg, Ewa and Kale, Arundhati S and Riley, Alyssa A and Swartz, Sarah J and Scott, Daryl A and Yang, Yaping and Srivaths, Poyyapakkam R and Wenderfer, Scott E and Bodurtha, Joann and Applegate, Carolyn D and Velinov, Milen and Myers, Angela and Borovik, Lior and Craigen, William J and Hanchard, Neil A and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Lewis, Richard Alan and Gonzales, Edmond T and Gibbs, Richard A and Belmont, John W and Roth, David R and Eng, Christine and Braun, Michael C and Lupski, James R and Lamb, Dolores J} } @article {217, title = {Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {312}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Nov 12}, pages = {1870-9}, abstract = {

IMPORTANCE: Clinical whole-exome sequencing is increasingly used for diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected genetic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To perform clinical whole-exome sequencing and report (1) the rate of molecular diagnosis among phenotypic groups, (2) the spectrum of genetic alterations contributing to disease, and (3) the prevalence of medically actionable incidental findings such as FBN1 mutations causing Marfan syndrome.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Observational study of 2000 consecutive patients with clinical whole-exome sequencing analyzed between June 2012 and August 2014. Whole-exome sequencing tests were performed at a clinical genetics laboratory in the United States. Results were reported by clinical molecular geneticists certified by the American Board of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Tests were ordered by the patient{\textquoteright}s physician. The patients were primarily pediatric (1756 [88\%]; mean age, 6 years; 888 females [44\%], 1101 males [55\%], and 11 fetuses [1\% gender unknown]), demonstrating diverse clinical manifestations most often including nervous system dysfunction such as developmental delay.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Whole-exome sequencing diagnosis rate overall and by phenotypic category, mode of inheritance, spectrum of genetic events, and reporting of incidental findings.

RESULTS: A molecular diagnosis was reported for 504 patients (25.2\%) with 58\% of the diagnostic mutations not previously reported. Molecular diagnosis rates for each phenotypic category were 143/526 (27.2\%; 95\% CI, 23.5\%-31.2\%) for the neurological group, 282/1147 (24.6\%; 95\% CI, 22.1\%-27.2\%) for the neurological plus other organ systems group, 30/83 (36.1\%; 95\% CI, 26.1\%-47.5\%) for the specific neurological group, and 49/244 (20.1\%; 95\% CI, 15.6\%-25.8\%) for the nonneurological group. The Mendelian disease patterns of the 527 molecular diagnoses included 280 (53.1\%) autosomal dominant, 181 (34.3\%) autosomal recessive (including 5 with uniparental disomy), 65 (12.3\%) X-linked, and 1 (0.2\%) mitochondrial. Of 504 patients with a molecular diagnosis, 23 (4.6\%) had blended phenotypes resulting from 2 single gene defects. About 30\% of the positive cases harbored mutations in disease genes reported since 2011. There were 95 medically actionable incidental findings in genes unrelated to the phenotype but with immediate implications for management in 92 patients (4.6\%), including 59 patients (3\%) with mutations in genes recommended for reporting by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Whole-exome sequencing provided a potential molecular diagnosis for 25\% of a large cohort of patients referred for evaluation of suspected genetic conditions, including detection of rare genetic events and new mutations contributing to disease. The yield of whole-exome sequencing may offer advantages over traditional molecular diagnostic approaches in certain patients.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Exome, Female, Fetus, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Testing, Genomics, Humans, Incidental Findings, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Mutation, Phenotype, Referral and Consultation, Sequence Analysis, DNA}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2014.14601}, author = {Yang, Yaping and Muzny, Donna M and Xia, Fan and Niu, Zhiyv and Person, Richard and Ding, Yan and Ward, Patricia and Braxton, Alicia and Wang, Min and Buhay, Christian and Veeraraghavan, Narayanan and Hawes, Alicia and Chiang, Theodore and Leduc, Magalie and Beuten, Joke and Zhang, Jing and He, Weimin and Scull, Jennifer and Willis, Alecia and Landsverk, Megan and Craigen, William J and Bekheirnia, Mir Reza and Stray-Pedersen, Asbjorg and Liu, Pengfei and Wen, Shu and Alcaraz, Wendy and Cui, Hong and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Reid, Jeffrey and Bainbridge, Matthew and Patel, Ankita and Boerwinkle, Eric and Beaudet, Arthur L and Lupski, James R and Plon, Sharon E and Gibbs, Richard A and Eng, Christine M} }