@article {170,
	title = {Alu-mediated diverse and complex pathogenic copy-number variants within human chromosome 17 at p13.3.},
	journal = {Hum Mol Genet},
	volume = {24},
	year = {2015},
	month = {2015 Jul 15},
	pages = {4061-77},
	abstract = {<p>Alu repetitive elements are known to be major contributors to genome instability by generating Alu-mediated copy-number variants (CNVs). Most of the reported Alu-mediated CNVs are simple deletions and duplications, and the mechanism underlying Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangement has been attributed to non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Chromosome 17 at the p13.3 genomic region lacks extensive low-copy repeat architecture; however, it is highly enriched for Alu repetitive elements, with a fraction of 30\% of total sequence annotated in the human reference genome, compared with the 10\% genome-wide and 18\% on chromosome 17. We conducted mechanistic studies of the 17p13.3 CNVs by performing high-density oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization, specifically interrogating the 17p13.3 region with \~{}150 bp per probe density; CNV breakpoint junctions were mapped to nucleotide resolution by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Studied rearrangements include 5 interstitial deletions, 14 tandem duplications, 7 terminal deletions and 13 complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs). Within the 17p13.3 region, Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangements were identified in 80\% of the interstitial deletions, 46\% of the tandem duplications and 50\% of the CGRs, indicating that this mechanism was a major contributor for formation of breakpoint junctions. Our studies suggest that Alu repetitive elements facilitate formation of non-recurrent CNVs, CGRs and other structural aberrations of chromosome 17 at p13.3. The common observation of Alu-mediated rearrangement in CGRs and breakpoint junction sequences analysis further demonstrates that this type of mechanism is unlikely attributed to NAHR, but rather may be due to a recombination-coupled DNA replicative repair process. </p>},
	keywords = {Alleles, Alu Elements, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gene Duplication, Gene Rearrangement, Genome, Human, Genomic Instability, Genomics, Homologous Recombination, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Segmental Duplications, Genomic, Sequence Deletion},
	issn = {1460-2083},
	doi = {10.1093/hmg/ddv146},
	author = {Gu, Shen and Yuan, Bo and Campbell, Ian M and Beck, Christine R and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Patel, Ankita and Bacino, Carlos A and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bi, Weimin and Lupski, James R}
}
@article {229,
	title = {Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders.},
	journal = {Am J Hum Genet},
	volume = {95},
	year = {2014},
	month = {2014 Aug 07},
	pages = {173-82},
	abstract = {<p>New human mutations are thought to originate in germ cells, thus making a recurrence of the same mutation in a sibling exceedingly rare. However, increasing sensitivity of genomic technologies has anecdotally revealed mosaicism for mutations in somatic tissues of apparently healthy parents. Such somatically mosaic parents might also have germline mosaicism that can potentially cause unexpected intergenerational recurrences. Here, we show that somatic mosaicism for transmitted mutations among parents of children with simplex genetic disease is more common than currently appreciated. Using the sensitivity of individual-specific breakpoint PCR, we prospectively screened 100 families with children affected by genomic disorders due to rare deletion copy-number variants (CNVs) determined to be de novo by clinical analysis of parental DNA. Surprisingly, we identified four cases of low-level somatic mosaicism for the transmitted CNV in DNA isolated from parental blood. Integrated probabilistic modeling of gametogenesis developed in response to our observations predicts that mutations in parental blood increase recurrence risk substantially more than parental mutations confined to the germline. Moreover, despite the fact that maternally transmitted mutations are the minority of alleles, our model suggests that sexual dimorphisms in gametogenesis result in a greater proportion of somatically mosaic transmitting mothers who are thus at increased risk of recurrence. Therefore, somatic mosaicism together with sexual differences in gametogenesis might explain a considerable fraction of unexpected recurrences of X-linked recessive disease. Overall, our results underscore an important role for somatic mosaicism and mitotic replicative mutational mechanisms in transmission genetics. </p>},
	keywords = {Cell Division, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Mosaicism, Mutation, Pedigree, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk, Sex Characteristics, Smith-Magenis Syndrome},
	issn = {1537-6605},
	doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.003},
	author = {Campbell, Ian M and Yuan, Bo and Robberecht, Caroline and Pfundt, Rolph and Szafranski, Przemyslaw and McEntagart, Meriel E and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Bartnik, Magdalena and Wi{\'s}niowiecka-Kowalnik, Barbara and Plunkett, Katie S and Pursley, Amber N and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Vast, Mala and Marks, Karen and Patton, Michael and Olofsson, Peter and Patel, Ankita and Veltman, Joris A and Cheung, Sau Wai and Shaw, Chad A and Vissers, Lisenka E L M and Vermeesch, Joris R and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}}
}
