@article {164, title = {Autosomal-Dominant Multiple Pterygium Syndrome Is Caused by Mutations in MYH3.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {96}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 May 07}, pages = {841-9}, abstract = {

Multiple pterygium syndrome (MPS) is a phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous group of rare Mendelian conditions characterized by multiple pterygia, scoliosis, and congenital contractures of the limbs. MPS typically segregates as an autosomal-recessive disorder, but rare instances of autosomal-dominant transmission have been reported. Whereas several mutations causing recessive MPS have been identified, the genetic basis of dominant MPS remains unknown. We identified four families affected by dominantly transmitted MPS characterized by pterygia, camptodactyly of the hands, vertebral fusions, and scoliosis. Exome sequencing identified predicted protein-altering mutations in embryonic myosin heavy chain (MYH3) in three families. MYH3 mutations underlie distal arthrogryposis types 1, 2A, and 2B, but all mutations reported to date occur in the head and neck domains. In contrast, two of the mutations found to cause MPS in this study occurred in the tail domain. The phenotypic overlap among persons with MPS, coupled with physical findings distinct from other conditions caused by mutations in MYH3, suggests that the developmental mechanism underlying MPS differs from that of other conditions and/or that certain functions of embryonic myosin might be perturbed by disruption of specific residues and/or domains. Moreover, the vertebral fusions in persons with MPS, coupled with evidence of MYH3 expression in bone, suggest that embryonic myosin plays a role in skeletal development.

}, keywords = {Arthrogryposis, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Exome, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Mutation, Myosins, Osteogenesis}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.04.004}, author = {Chong, Jessica X and Burrage, Lindsay C and Beck, Anita E and Marvin, Colby T and McMillin, Margaret J and Shively, Kathryn M and Harrell, Tanya M and Buckingham, Kati J and Bacino, Carlos A and Jain, Mahim and Alanay, Yasemin and Berry, Susan A and Carey, John C and Gibbs, Richard A and Lee, Brendan H and Krakow, Deborah and Shendure, Jay and Nickerson, Deborah A and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {149, title = {The Genetic Basis of Mendelian Phenotypes: Discoveries, Challenges, and Opportunities.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {97}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Aug 06}, pages = {199-215}, abstract = {

Discovering the genetic basis of a Mendelian phenotype establishes a causal link between genotype and phenotype, making possible carrier and population screening and direct diagnosis. Such discoveries also contribute to our knowledge of gene function, gene regulation, development, and biological mechanisms that can be used for developing new therapeutics. As of February 2015, 2,937 genes underlying 4,163 Mendelian phenotypes have been discovered, but the genes underlying \~{}50\% (i.e., 3,152) of all known Mendelian phenotypes are still unknown, and many more Mendelian conditions have yet to be recognized. This is a formidable gap in biomedical knowledge. Accordingly, in December 2011, the NIH established the Centers for Mendelian Genomics (CMGs) to provide the collaborative framework and infrastructure necessary for undertaking large-scale whole-exome sequencing and discovery of the genetic variants responsible for Mendelian phenotypes. In partnership with 529 investigators from 261 institutions in 36 countries, the CMGs assessed 18,863 samples from 8,838 families representing 579 known and 470 novel Mendelian phenotypes as of January 2015. This collaborative effort has identified 956 genes, including 375 not previously associated with human health, that underlie a Mendelian phenotype. These results provide insight into study design and analytical strategies, identify novel mechanisms of disease, and reveal the extensive clinical variability of Mendelian phenotypes. Discovering the gene underlying every Mendelian phenotype will require tackling challenges such as worldwide ascertainment and phenotypic characterization of families affected by Mendelian conditions, improvement in sequencing and analytical techniques, and pervasive sharing of phenotypic and genomic data among researchers, clinicians, and families.

}, keywords = {Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Phenotype, Proteins}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.06.009}, author = {Chong, Jessica X and Buckingham, Kati J and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Boehm, Corinne and Sobreira, Nara and Smith, Joshua D and Harrell, Tanya M and McMillin, Margaret J and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Gambin, Tomasz and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Doheny, Kimberly and Scott, Alan F and Avramopoulos, Dimitri and Chakravarti, Aravinda and Hoover-Fong, Julie and Mathews, Debra and Witmer, P Dane and Ling, Hua and Hetrick, Kurt and Watkins, Lee and Patterson, Karynne E and Reinier, Frederic and Blue, Elizabeth and Muzny, Donna and Kircher, Martin and Bilguvar, Kaya and L{\'o}pez-Gir{\'a}ldez, Francesc and Sutton, V Reid and Tabor, Holly K and Leal, Suzanne M and G{\"u}nel, Murat and Mane, Shrikant and Gibbs, Richard A and Boerwinkle, Eric and Hamosh, Ada and Shendure, Jay and Lupski, James R and Lifton, Richard P and Valle, David and Nickerson, Deborah A and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {238, title = {Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jul 03}, pages = {77-84}, abstract = {

Professional recommendations for the return of results from exome and whole-genome sequencing (ES/WGS) have been controversial. The lack of clear guidance about whether and, if so, how to return ES/WGS incidental results limits the extent to which individuals and families might benefit from ES/WGS. The perspectives of genetics professionals, particularly those at the forefront of using ES/WGS in clinics, are largely unknown. Data on stakeholder perspectives could help clarify how to weigh expert positions and recommendations. We conducted an online survey of 9,857 genetics professionals to learn their attitudes on the return of incidental results from ES/WGS and the recent American College of Medical Genetic and Genomics Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing. Of the 847 respondents, 760 completed the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents thought that incidental ES/WGS results should be offered to adult patients (85\%), healthy adults (75\%), and the parents of a child with a medical condition (74\%). The majority thought that incidental results about adult-onset conditions (62\%) and carrier status (62\%) should be offered to the parents of a child with a medical condition. About half thought that offered results should not be limited to those deemed clinically actionable. The vast majority (81\%) thought that individual preferences should guide return. Genetics professionals{\textquoteright} perspectives on the return of ES/WGS results differed substantially from current recommendations, underscoring the need to establish clear purpose for recommendations on the return of incidental ES/WGS results as professional societies grapple with developing and updating recommendations.

}, keywords = {Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Exome, Genetics, Medical, Genome, Human, Humans, Incidental Findings, Workforce}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.004}, author = {Yu, Joon-Ho and Harrell, Tanya M and Jamal, Seema M and Tabor, Holly K and Bamshad, Michael J} }