@article {810, title = {Missed diagnoses: Clinically relevant lessons learned through medical mysteries solved by the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.}, journal = {Mol Genet Genomic Med}, volume = {8}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {e1397}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Resources within the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN), such as genome sequencing (GS) and model organisms aid in diagnosis and identification of new disease genes, but are currently difficult to access by clinical providers. While these resources do contribute to diagnoses in many cases, they are not always necessary to reach diagnostic resolution. The UDN experience has been that participants can also receive diagnoses through the thoughtful and customized application of approaches and resources that are readily available in clinical settings.

METHODS: The UDN Genetic Counseling and Testing Working Group collected case vignettes that illustrated how clinically available methods resulted in diagnoses. The case vignettes were classified into three themes; phenotypic considerations, selection of genetic testing, and evaluating exome/GS variants and data.

RESULTS: We present 12 participants that illustrate how clinical practices such as phenotype-driven genomic investigations, consideration of variable expressivity, selecting the relevant tissue of interest for testing, utilizing updated testing platforms, and recognition of alternate transcript nomenclature resulted in diagnoses.

CONCLUSION: These examples demonstrate that when a diagnosis is elusive, an iterative patient-specific approach utilizing assessment options available to clinical providers may solve a portion of cases. However, this does require increased provider time commitment, a particular challenge in the current practice of genomics.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Databases, Factual, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Testing, Humans, Information Dissemination, Male, Middle Aged, Missed Diagnosis, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Phenotype, Precision Medicine, Undiagnosed Diseases, United States, Young Adult}, issn = {2324-9269}, doi = {10.1002/mgg3.1397}, author = {Cope, Heidi and Spillmann, Rebecca and Rosenfeld, Jill A and Brokamp, Elly and Signer, Rebecca and Schoch, Kelly and Kelley, Emily G and Sullivan, Jennifer A and Macnamara, Ellen and Lincoln, Sharyn and Golden-Grant, Katie and Orengo, James P and Clark, Gary and Burrage, Lindsay C and Posey, Jennifer E and Punetha, Jaya and Robertson, Amy and Cogan, Joy and Phillips, John A and Martinez-Agosto, Julian and Shashi, Vandana} } @article {673, title = {Reanalysis of Clinical Exome Sequencing Data.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {380}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 06 20}, pages = {2478-2480}, keywords = {Exome, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Testing, Humans, Mutation, Phenotype, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMc1812033}, author = {Liu, Pengfei and Meng, Linyan and Normand, Elizabeth A and Xia, Fan and Song, Xiaofei and Ghazi, Andrew and Rosenfeld, Jill and Magoulas, Pilar L and Braxton, Alicia and Ward, Patricia and Dai, Hongzheng and Yuan, Bo and Bi, Weimin and Xiao, Rui and Wang, Xia and Chiang, Theodore and Vetrini, Francesco and He, Weimin and Cheng, Hanyin and Dong, Jie and Gijavanekar, Charul and Benke, Paul J and Bernstein, Jonathan A and Eble, Tanya and Eroglu, Yasemen and Erwin, Deanna and Escobar, Luis and Gibson, James B and Gripp, Karen and Kleppe, Soledad and Koenig, Mary K and Lewis, Andrea M and Natowicz, Marvin and Mancias, Pedro and Minor, LaKeesha and Scaglia, Fernando and Schaaf, Christian P and Streff, Haley and Vernon, Hilary and Uhles, Crescenda L and Zackai, Elaine H and Wu, Nan and Sutton, V Reid and Beaudet, Arthur L and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Posey, Jennifer E and Lalani, Seema and Shaw, Chad and Eng, Christine M and Lupski, James R and Yang, Yaping} } @article {15, title = {Dominant Transmission Observed in Adolescents and Families With Orthostatic Intolerance.}, journal = {Pediatr Neurol}, volume = {66}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jan}, pages = {53-58.e5}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic intolerance is typically thought to be sporadic and attributed to cerebral autonomic dysfunction. We sought to identify families with inherited autonomic dysfunction manifest as symptomatic orthostatic intolerance to characterize mode of inheritance and clinical features.

METHODS: Sixteen families with two or more first- or second-degree relatives with autonomic dysfunction and orthostatic intolerance were enrolled. A clinical diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction defined by symptomatic orthostatic intolerance diagnosed by head-up tilt table testing was confirmed for each proband. Clinical features and evaluation were obtained from each proband using a standardized intake questionnaire, and family history information was obtained from probands and available relatives.

RESULTS: Comprehensive pedigree analysis of 16 families (39 individuals with orthostatic intolerance~and 40 individuals suspected of having orthostatic intolerance)~demonstrated dominant transmission of autonomic dysfunction with incomplete penetrance. Affected individuals were predominantly female (71.8\%, 28/39; F:M, 2.5:1). Male-to-male transmission, although less common, was observed and demonstrated to transmit through unaffected males with an affected parent. Similar to sporadic orthostatic intolerance, probands report a range of symptoms across multiple organ systems, with headaches and neuromuscular features being most common.

CONCLUSIONS: Familial occurrence and vertical transmission of autonomic dysfunction in 16 families suggest~a novel genetic syndrome with dominant transmission, incomplete penetrance, and skewing of the sex ratio. Elucidation of potential genetic contributions to orthostatic intolerance may inform therapeutic management and identification of individuals at risk. Adolescent evaluation should include identification and treatment of potential at-risk relatives.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Cohort Studies, Family, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Orthostatic Intolerance, Pedigree, Posture, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tilt-Table Test}, issn = {1873-5150}, doi = {10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.09.013}, author = {Posey, Jennifer E and Martinez, Rebecca and Lankford, Jeremy E and Lupski, James R and Numan, Mohammed T and Butler, Ian J} } @article {110, title = {Molecular diagnostic experience of whole-exome sequencing in adult patients.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {18}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 07}, pages = {678-85}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool in medicine, but prior reports focus on predominantly pediatric cohorts with neurologic or developmental disorders. We describe the diagnostic yield and characteristics of WES in adults.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive WES reports for adults from a diagnostic laboratory. Phenotype composition was determined using Human Phenotype Ontology terms.

RESULTS: Molecular diagnoses were reported for 17.5\% (85/486) of adults, which is lower than that for a primarily pediatric population (25.2\%; P = 0.0003); the diagnostic rate was higher (23.9\%) for those 18-30 years of age compared to patients older than 30 years (10.4\%; P = 0.0001). Dual Mendelian diagnoses contributed to 7\% of diagnoses, revealing blended phenotypes. Diagnoses were more frequent among individuals with abnormalities of the nervous system, skeletal system, head/neck, and growth. Diagnostic rate was independent of family history information, and de novo mutations contributed to 61.4\% of autosomal dominant diagnoses.

CONCLUSION: Early WES experience in adults demonstrates molecular diagnoses in a substantial proportion of patients, informing clinical management, recurrence risk, and recommendations for relatives. A positive family history was not predictive, consistent with molecular diagnoses often revealed by de novo events, informing the Mendelian basis of genetic disease in adults.Genet Med 18 7, 678-685.

}, keywords = {Adult, Exome, Female, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, Genome, Human, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Male, Pathology, Molecular}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2015.142}, author = {Posey, Jennifer E and Rosenfeld, Jill A and James, Regis A and Bainbridge, Matthew and Niu, Zhiyv and Wang, Xia and Dhar, Shweta and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Akdemir, Zeynep H C and Gambin, Tomasz and Xia, Fan and Person, Richard E and Walkiewicz, Magdalena and Shaw, Chad A and Sutton, V Reid and Beaudet, Arthur L and Muzny, Donna and Eng, Christine M and Yang, Yaping and Gibbs, Richard A and Lupski, James R and Boerwinkle, Eric and Plon, Sharon E} }