@article {584, title = {Megabase Length Hypermutation Accompanies Human Structural Variation at 17p11.2.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {176}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 03 07}, pages = {1310-1324.e10}, abstract = {

DNA rearrangements resulting in human genome structural variants (SVs) are caused by diverse mutational mechanisms. We used long- and short-read sequencing technologies to investigate end products of de novo chromosome 17p11.2 rearrangements and query the molecular mechanisms underlying both recurrent and non-recurrent events. Evidence for an increased rate of clustered single-nucleotide variant (SNV) mutation in cis with non-recurrent rearrangements was found. Indel and SNV formation are associated with both copy-number gains and losses of 17p11.2, occur up to \~{}1 Mb away from the breakpoint junctions, and favor C > G transversion substitutions; results suggest that single-stranded DNA is formed during the genesis of the SV and provide compelling support for a microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR) mechanism for SV formation. Our data show an additional mutational burden of MMBIR consisting of hypermutation confined to the locus and manifesting as SNVs and indels predominantly within genes.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.045}, author = {Beck, Christine R and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Akdemir, Zeynep C and Sedlazeck, Fritz J and Song, Xiaofei and Meng, Qingchang and Hu, Jianhong and Doddapaneni, Harsha and Chong, Zechen and Chen, Edward S and Thornton, Philip C and Liu, Pengfei and Yuan, Bo and Withers, Marjorie and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Kalra, Divya and Walker, Kimberly and English, Adam C and Han, Yi and Chen, Ken and Muzny, Donna M and Ira, Grzegorz and Shaw, Chad A and Gibbs, Richard A and Hastings, P J and Lupski, James R} } @article {617, title = {Predicting human genes susceptible to genomic instability associated with /-mediated rearrangements.}, journal = {Genome Res}, volume = {28}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 08}, pages = {1228-1242}, abstract = {

elements, the short interspersed element numbering more than 1 million copies per human genome, can mediate the formation of copy number variants (CNVs) between substrate pairs. These /-mediated rearrangements (AAMRs) can result in pathogenic variants that cause diseases. To investigate the impact of AAMR on gene variation and human health, we first characterized s that are involved in mediating CNVs (CNV-s) and observed that these s tend to be evolutionarily younger. We then computationally generated, with the assistance of a supercomputer, a test data set consisting of 78 million pairs and predicted \~{}18\% of them are potentially susceptible to AAMR. We further determined the relative risk of AAMR in 12,074 OMIM genes using the count of predicted CNV- pairs and experimentally validated the predictions with 89 samples selected by correlating predicted hotspots with a database of CNVs identified by clinical chromosomal microarrays (CMAs) on the genomes of approximately 54,000 subjects. We fine-mapped 47 duplications, 40 deletions, and two complex rearrangements and examined a total of 52 breakpoint junctions of simple CNVs. Overall, 94\% of the candidate breakpoints were at least partially mediated. We successfully predicted all (100\%) of pairs that mediated deletions ( = 21) and achieved an 87\% positive predictive value overall when including AAMR-generated deletions and duplications. We provided a tool, AluAluCNVpredictor, for assessing AAMR hotspots and their role in human disease. These results demonstrate the utility of our predictive model and provide insights into the genomic features and molecular mechanisms underlying AAMR.

}, keywords = {Alu Elements, DNA Copy Number Variations, Gene Duplication, Genome, Human, Genomic Instability, Humans, Sequence Deletion}, issn = {1549-5469}, doi = {10.1101/gr.229401.117}, author = {Song, Xiaofei and Beck, Christine R and Du, Renqian and Campbell, Ian M and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Gu, Shen and Breman, Amy M and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Ira, Grzegorz and Shaw, Chad A and Lupski, James R} } @article {185, title = {Absence of heterozygosity due to template switching during replicative rearrangements.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {96}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Apr 02}, pages = {555-64}, abstract = {

We investigated complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs) consisting of triplication copy-number variants (CNVs) that were accompanied by extended regions of copy-number-neutral absence of heterozygosity (AOH) in subjects with multiple congenital abnormalities. Molecular analyses provided observational evidence that in humans, post-zygotically generated CGRs can lead to regional uniparental disomy (UPD) due to template switches between homologs versus sister chromatids by using microhomology to prime DNA replication-a prediction of the replicative repair model, MMBIR. Our findings suggest that replication-based mechanisms might underlie the formation of diverse types of genomic alterations (CGRs and AOH) implicated in constitutional disorders.

}, keywords = {Base Sequence, DNA Copy Number Variations, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Gene Rearrangement, Humans, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Loss of Heterozygosity, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Netherlands, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Uniparental Disomy}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.01.021}, author = {Carvalho, Claudia M B and Pfundt, Rolph and King, Daniel A and Lindsay, Sarah J and Zuccherato, Luciana W and Macville, Merryn V E and Liu, Pengfei and Johnson, Diana and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Brown, Chester W and Shaw, Chad A and Hurles, Matthew E and Ira, Grzegorz and Hastings, P J and Brunner, Han G and Lupski, James R} } @article {133, title = {DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage.}, journal = {Science}, volume = {349}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Aug 14}, pages = {742-7}, abstract = {

Most spontaneous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) result from replication-fork breakage. Break-induced replication (BIR), a genome rearrangement-prone repair mechanism that requires the Pol32/POLD3 subunit of eukaryotic DNA PolĪ“, was proposed to repair broken forks, but how genome destabilization is avoided was unknown. We show that broken fork repair initially uses error-prone Pol32-dependent synthesis, but that mutagenic synthesis is limited to within a few kilobases from the break by Mus81 endonuclease and a converging fork. Mus81 suppresses template switches between both homologous sequences and diverged human Alu repetitive elements, highlighting its importance for stability of highly repetitive genomes. We propose that lack of a timely converging fork or Mus81 may propel genome instability observed in cancer.

}, keywords = {Alu Elements, Base Sequence, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Endonucleases, Genomic Instability, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Neoplasms, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins}, issn = {1095-9203}, doi = {10.1126/science.aaa8391}, author = {Mayle, Ryan and Campbell, Ian M and Beck, Christine R and Yu, Yang and Wilson, Marenda and Shaw, Chad A and Bjergbaek, Lotte and Lupski, James R and Ira, Grzegorz} }