@article {752, title = {Whole exome sequencing identified ATP6V1C2 as a novel candidate gene for recessive distal renal tubular acidosis.}, journal = {Kidney Int}, volume = {97}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 03}, pages = {567-579}, abstract = {

Distal renal tubular acidosis is a rare renal tubular disorder characterized by hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and impaired urinary acidification. Mutations in three genes (ATP6V0A4, ATP6V1B1 and SLC4A1) constitute a monogenic causation in 58-70\% of familial cases of distal renal tubular acidosis. Recently, mutations in FOXI1 have been identified as an additional cause. Therefore, we hypothesized that further monogenic causes of distal renal tubular acidosis remain to be discovered. Panel sequencing and/or whole exome sequencing was performed in a cohort of 17 families with 19 affected individuals with pediatric onset distal renal tubular acidosis. A causative mutation was detected in one of the three "classical" known distal renal tubular acidosis genes in 10 of 17 families. The seven unsolved families were then subjected to candidate whole exome sequencing analysis. Potential disease causing mutations in three genes were detected: ATP6V1C2, which encodes another kidney specific subunit of the V-type proton ATPase (1 family); WDR72 (2 families), previously implicated in V-ATPase trafficking in cells; and SLC4A2 (1 family), a paralog of the known distal renal tubular acidosis gene SLC4A1. Two of these mutations were assessed for deleteriousness through functional studies. Yeast growth assays for ATP6V1C2 revealed loss-of-function for the patient mutation, strongly supporting ATP6V1C2 as a novel distal renal tubular acidosis gene. Thus, we provided a molecular diagnosis in a known distal renal tubular acidosis gene in 10 of 17 families (59\%) with this disease, identified mutations in ATP6V1C2 as a novel human candidate gene, and provided further evidence for phenotypic expansion in WDR72 mutations from amelogenesis imperfecta to distal renal tubular acidosis.

}, issn = {1523-1755}, doi = {10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.026}, author = {Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Kl{\"a}mbt, Verena and Tarsio, Maureen and Heneghan, John F and Majmundar, Amar J and Shril, Shirlee and Buerger, Florian and Ottlewski, Isabel and Shmukler, Boris E and Topaloglu, Rezan and Hashmi, Seema and Hafeez, Farkhanda and Emma, Francesco and Greco, Marcella and Laube, Guido F and Fathy, Hanan M and Pohl, Martin and Gellermann, Jutta and Milosevic, Danko and Baum, Michelle A and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Kane, Patricia M and Alper, Seth L and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {513, title = {Mutations in multiple components of the nuclear pore complex cause nephrotic syndrome.}, journal = {J Clin Invest}, volume = {128}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Oct 01}, pages = {4313-4328}, abstract = {

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) almost invariably progresses to end-stage renal disease. Although more than 50 monogenic causes of SRNS have been described, a large proportion of SRNS remains unexplained. Recently, it was discovered that mutations of NUP93 and NUP205, encoding 2 proteins of the inner ring subunit of the nuclear pore complex (NPC), cause SRNS. Here, we describe mutations in genes encoding 4 components of the outer rings of the NPC, namely NUP107, NUP85, NUP133, and NUP160, in 13 families with SRNS. Using coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we showed that certain pathogenic alleles weakened the interaction between neighboring NPC subunits. We demonstrated that morpholino knockdown of nup107, nup85, or nup133 in Xenopus disrupted glomerulogenesis. Re-expression of WT mRNA, but not of mRNA reflecting mutations from SRNS patients, mitigated this phenotype. We furthermore found that CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of NUP107, NUP85, or NUP133 in podocytes activated Cdc42, an important effector of SRNS pathogenesis. CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of nup107 or nup85 in zebrafish caused developmental anomalies and early lethality. In contrast, an in-frame mutation of nup107 did not affect survival, thus mimicking the allelic effects seen in humans. In conclusion, we discovered here that mutations in 4 genes encoding components of the outer ring subunits of the NPC cause SRNS and thereby provide further evidence that specific hypomorphic mutations in these essential genes cause a distinct, organ-specific phenotype.

}, issn = {1558-8238}, doi = {10.1172/JCI98688}, author = {Braun, Daniela A and Lovric, Svjetlana and Schapiro, David and Schneider, Ronen and Marquez, Jonathan and Asif, Maria and Hussain, Muhammad Sajid and Daga, Ankana and Widmeier, Eugen and Rao, Jia and Ashraf, Shazia and Tan, Weizhen and Lusk, C Patrick and Kolb, Amy and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Hoogstraten, Charlotte A and Eddy, Kaitlyn and Kitzler, Thomas M and Shril, Shirlee and Moawia, Abubakar and Schrage, Kathrin and Khayyat, Arwa Ishaq A and Lawson, Jennifer A and Gee, Heon Yung and Warejko, Jillian K and Hermle, Tobias and Majmundar, Amar J and Hugo, Hannah and Budde, Birgit and Motameny, Susanne and Altm{\"u}ller, Janine and Noegel, Angelika Anna and Fathy, Hanan M and Gale, Daniel P and Waseem, Syeda Seema and Khan, Ayaz and Kerecuk, Larissa and Hashmi, Seema and Mohebbi, Nilufar and Ettenger, Robert and Serdaroglu, Erkin and Alhasan, Khalid A and Hashem, Mais and Goncalves, Sara and Ariceta, Gema and Ubetagoyena, Mercedes and Antonin, Wolfram and Baig, Shahid Mahmood and Alkuraya, Fowzan S and Shen, Qian and Xu, Hong and Antignac, Corinne and Lifton, Richard P and Mane, Shrikant and N{\"u}rnberg, Peter and Khokha, Mustafa K and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {441, title = {Whole exome sequencing frequently detects a monogenic cause in early onset nephrolithiasis and~nephrocalcinosis.}, journal = {Kidney Int}, volume = {93}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 01}, pages = {204-213}, abstract = {

The incidence of nephrolithiasis continues to rise. Previously, we showed that a monogenic cause could be detected in 11.4\% of individuals with adult-onset nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis and in 16.7-20.8\% of individuals with onset before 18 years of age, using gene panel sequencing of 30 genes known to cause nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis. To overcome the limitations of panel sequencing, we utilized whole exome sequencing in 51 families, who presented before age 25 years with at least one renal stone or with a renal ultrasound finding of nephrocalcinosis to identify the underlying molecular genetic cause of disease. In 15 of 51 families, we detected a monogenic causative mutation by whole exome sequencing. A mutation in seven recessive genes (AGXT, ATP6V1B1, CLDN16, CLDN19, GRHPR, SLC3A1, SLC12A1), in one dominant gene (SLC9A3R1), and in one gene (SLC34A1) with both recessive and dominant inheritance was detected. Seven of the 19 different mutations were not previously described as disease-causing. In one family, a causative mutation in one of 117 genes that may represent phenocopies of nephrolithiasis-causing genes was detected. In nine of 15 families, the genetic diagnosis may have specific implications for stone management and prevention. Several factors that correlated with the higher detection rate in our cohort were younger age at onset of nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis, presence of multiple affected members in a family, and presence of consanguinity. Thus, we established whole exome sequencing as an efficient approach toward a molecular genetic diagnosis in individuals with nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis who manifest before age 25 years.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Age of Onset, Child, Child, Preschool, Disease Progression, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Markers, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Heredity, Humans, Infant, Male, Mutation, Nephrocalcinosis, Nephrolithiasis, Pedigree, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Whole Exome Sequencing, Young Adult}, issn = {1523-1755}, doi = {10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.025}, author = {Daga, Ankana and Majmundar, Amar J and Braun, Daniela A and Gee, Heon Yung and Lawson, Jennifer A and Shril, Shirlee and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Vivante, Asaf and Schapiro, David and Tan, Weizhen and Warejko, Jillian K and Widmeier, Eugen and Nelson, Caleb P and Fathy, Hanan M and Gucev, Zoran and Soliman, Neveen A and Hashmi, Seema and Halbritter, Jan and Halty, Margarita and Kari, Jameela A and El-Desoky, Sherif and Ferguson, Michael A and Somers, Michael J G and Traum, Avram Z and Stein, Deborah R and Daouk, Ghaleb H and Rodig, Nancy M and Katz, Avi and Hanna, Christian and Schwaderer, Andrew L and Sayer, John A and Wassner, Ari J and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Milosevic, Danko and Tasic, Velibor and Baum, Michelle A and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {630, title = {Whole Exome Sequencing of Patients with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome.}, journal = {Clin J Am Soc Nephrol}, volume = {13}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 01 06}, pages = {53-62}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome overwhelmingly progresses to ESRD. More than 30 monogenic genes have been identified to cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. We previously detected causative mutations using targeted panel sequencing in 30\% of patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Panel sequencing has a number of limitations when compared with whole exome sequencing. We employed whole exome sequencing to detect monogenic causes of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in an international cohort of 300 families.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, \& MEASUREMENTS: Three hundred thirty-five individuals with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome from 300 families were recruited from April of 1998 to June of 2016. Age of onset was restricted to <25 years of age. Exome data were evaluated for 33 known monogenic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome genes.

RESULTS: In 74 of 300 families (25\%), we identified a causative mutation in one of 20 genes known to cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. In 11 families (3.7\%), we detected a mutation in a gene that causes a phenocopy of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. This is consistent with our previously published identification of mutations using a panel approach. We detected a causative mutation in a known steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome gene in 38\% of consanguineous families and in 13\% of nonconsanguineous families, and 48\% of children with congenital nephrotic syndrome. A total of 68 different mutations were detected in 20 of 33 steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome genes. Fifteen of these mutations were novel. , , , and were the most common genes in which we detected a mutation. In another 28\% of families, we detected mutations in one or more candidate genes for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS: Whole exome sequencing is a sensitive approach toward diagnosis of monogenic causes of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. A molecular genetic diagnosis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome may have important consequences for the management of treatment and kidney transplantation in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

}, issn = {1555-905X}, doi = {10.2215/CJN.04120417}, author = {Warejko, Jillian K and Tan, Weizhen and Daga, Ankana and Schapiro, David and Lawson, Jennifer A and Shril, Shirlee and Lovric, Svjetlana and Ashraf, Shazia and Rao, Jia and Hermle, Tobias and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Widmeier, Eugen and Majmundar, Amar J and Schneider, Ronen and Gee, Heon Yung and Schmidt, J Magdalena and Vivante, Asaf and van der Ven, Amelie T and Ityel, Hadas and Chen, Jing and Sadowski, Carolin E and Kohl, Stefan and Pabst, Werner L and Nakayama, Makiko and Somers, Michael J G and Rodig, Nancy M and Daouk, Ghaleb and Baum, Michelle and Stein, Deborah R and Ferguson, Michael A and Traum, Avram Z and Soliman, Neveen A and Kari, Jameela A and El Desoky, Sherif and Fathy, Hanan and Zenker, Martin and Bakkaloglu, Sevcan A and M{\"u}ller, Dominik and Noyan, Aytul and Ozaltin, Fatih and Cadnapaphornchai, Melissa A and Hashmi, Seema and Hopcian, Jeffrey and Kopp, Jeffrey B and Benador, Nadine and Bockenhauer, Detlef and Bogdanovic, Radovan and Staji{\'c}, Natasa and Chernin, Gil and Ettenger, Robert and Fehrenbach, Henry and Kemper, Markus and Munarriz, Reyner Loza and Podracka, Ludmila and B{\"u}scher, Rainer and Serdaroglu, Erkin and Tasic, Velibor and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Braun, Daniela A and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {405, title = {Mutations in sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase cause nephrosis with ichthyosis and adrenal insufficiency.}, journal = {J Clin Invest}, volume = {127}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Mar 01}, pages = {912-928}, abstract = {

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) causes 15\% of chronic kidney disease cases. A mutation in 1 of over 40 monogenic genes can be detected in approximately 30\% of individuals with SRNS whose symptoms manifest before 25 years of age. However, in many patients, the genetic etiology remains unknown. Here, we have performed whole exome sequencing to identify recessive causes of SRNS. In 7 families with SRNS and facultative ichthyosis, adrenal insufficiency, immunodeficiency, and neurological defects, we identified 9 different recessive mutations in SGPL1, which encodes sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) lyase. All mutations resulted in reduced or absent SGPL1 protein and/or enzyme activity. Overexpression of cDNA representing SGPL1 mutations resulted in subcellular mislocalization of SGPL1. Furthermore, expression of WT human SGPL1 rescued growth of SGPL1-deficient dpl1Δ yeast strains, whereas expression of disease-associated variants did not. Immunofluorescence revealed SGPL1 expression in mouse podocytes and mesangial cells. Knockdown of Sgpl1 in rat mesangial cells inhibited cell migration, which was partially rescued by VPC23109, an S1P receptor antagonist. In Drosophila, Sply mutants, which lack SGPL1, displayed a phenotype reminiscent of nephrotic syndrome in nephrocytes. WT Sply, but not the disease-associated variants, rescued this phenotype. Together, these results indicate that SGPL1 mutations cause a syndromic form of SRNS.

}, keywords = {Aldehyde-Lyases, Animals, Cell Line, Cell Movement, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Humans, Ichthyosis, Lamellar, Male, Mesangial Cells, Mice, Mice, Knockout, Mutation, Nephrotic Syndrome, Protein Transport, Rats}, issn = {1558-8238}, doi = {10.1172/JCI89626}, author = {Lovric, Svjetlana and Goncalves, Sara and Gee, Heon Yung and Oskouian, Babak and Srinivas, Honnappa and Choi, Won-Il and Shril, Shirlee and Ashraf, Shazia and Tan, Weizhen and Rao, Jia and Airik, Merlin and Schapiro, David and Braun, Daniela A and Sadowski, Carolin E and Widmeier, Eugen and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Girik, Vladimir and Capitani, Guido and Suh, Jung H and Lachauss{\'e}e, No{\"e}lle and Arrondel, Christelle and Patat, Julie and Gribouval, Olivier and Furlano, Monica and Boyer, Olivia and Schmitt, Alain and Vuiblet, Vincent and Hashmi, Seema and Wilcken, Rainer and Bernier, Francois P and Innes, A Micheil and Parboosingh, Jillian S and Lamont, Ryan E and Midgley, Julian P and Wright, Nicola and Majewski, Jacek and Zenker, Martin and Schaefer, Franz and Kuss, Navina and Greil, Johann and Giese, Thomas and Schwarz, Klaus and Catheline, Vilain and Schanze, Denny and Franke, Ingolf and Sznajer, Yves and Truant, Anne S and Adams, Brigitte and D{\'e}sir, Julie and Biemann, Ronald and Pei, York and Ars, Elisabet and Lloberas, Nuria and Madrid, Alvaro and Dharnidharka, Vikas R and Connolly, Anne M and Willing, Marcia C and Cooper, Megan A and Lifton, Richard P and Simons, Matias and Riezman, Howard and Antignac, Corinne and Saba, Julie D and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {124, title = {Whole exome sequencing identifies causative mutations in the majority of consanguineous or familial cases with childhood-onset increased renal echogenicity.}, journal = {Kidney Int}, volume = {89}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Feb}, pages = {468-475}, abstract = {

Chronically increased echogenicity on renal ultrasound is a sensitive early finding of chronic kidney disease that can be detected before manifestation of other symptoms. Increased echogenicity, however, is not specific for a certain etiology of chronic kidney disease. Here, we performed whole exome sequencing in 79 consanguineous or familial cases of suspected nephronophthisis in order to determine the underlying molecular disease cause. In 50 cases, there was a causative mutation in a known monogenic disease gene. In 32 of these cases whole exome sequencing confirmed the diagnosis of a nephronophthisis-related ciliopathy. In 8 cases it revealed the diagnosis of a renal tubulopathy. The remaining 10 cases were identified as Alport syndrome (4), autosomal-recessive polycystic kidney disease (2), congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (3), and APECED syndrome (1). In 5 families, in whom mutations in known monogenic genes were excluded, we applied homozygosity mapping for variant filtering and identified 5 novel candidate genes (RBM48, FAM186B, PIAS1, INCENP, and RCOR1) for renal ciliopathies. Thus, whole exome sequencing allows the detection of the causative mutation in 2/3 of affected individuals, thereby presenting the etiologic diagnosis, and allows identification of novel candidate genes.

}, keywords = {Age of Onset, Cohort Studies, DNA Mutational Analysis, Exome, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Cystic, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic}, issn = {1523-1755}, doi = {10.1038/ki.2015.317}, author = {Braun, Daniela A and Schueler, Markus and Halbritter, Jan and Gee, Heon Yung and Porath, Jonathan D and Lawson, Jennifer A and Airik, Rannar and Shril, Shirlee and Allen, Susan J and Stein, Deborah and Al Kindy, Adila and Beck, Bodo B and Cengiz, Nurcan and Moorani, Khemchand N and Ozaltin, Fatih and Hashmi, Seema and Sayer, John A and Bockenhauer, Detlef and Soliman, Neveen A and Otto, Edgar A and Lifton, Richard P and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} }