@article {636, title = {Copy Number Changes Identified Using Whole Exome Sequencing in Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and Palate in a Honduran Population.}, journal = {Birth Defects Res}, volume = {109}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Oct 02}, pages = {1257-1267}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The majority of cleft lip with or without cleft palate cases appear as an isolated, nonsyndromic entity (NSCLP). With the advent of next generation sequencing, whole exome sequencing (WES) has been used to identify single nucleotide variants and insertion/deletions which cause or increase the risk of NSCLP. However, to our knowledge, there are no published studies using WES in NSCLP to investigate copy number changes (CNCs), which are a major component of human genetic variation. Our study aimed to identify CNCs associated with NSCLP in a Honduran population using WES.

METHODS: WES was performed on two to four members of 27 multiplex Honduran families. CNCs were identified using two algorithms, CoNIFER and XHMM. Priority was given to CNCs that were identified in more than one patient and had variant frequencies of less than 5\% in reference data sets.

RESULTS: WES completion was defined as >90\% of the WES target at >8 {\texttimes} coverage and >80\% of the WES target at >20 {\texttimes} coverage. Twenty-four CNCs that met our inclusion criteria were identified by both CoNIFER and XHMM. These CNCs were confirmed using quantitative PCR. Pedigree analysis produced three CNCs corresponding to ADH7, AHR, and CRYZ segregating with NSCLP. Two of the three CNCs implicate genes, AHR and ADH7, whose known biological functions could plausibly play a role in NSCLP.

CONCLUSION: WES can be used to detect candidate CNCs that may be involved in the pathophysiology of NSCLP. Birth Defects Research 109:1257-1267, 2017. {\textcopyright} 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Dehydrogenase, Alleles, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, DNA Copy Number Variations, Family, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetic Variation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Honduras, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pedigree, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {2472-1727}, doi = {10.1002/bdr2.1063}, author = {Cai, Yi and Patterson, Karynne E and Reinier, Frederic and Keesecker, Sarah E and Blue, Elizabeth and Bamshad, Michael and Haddad, Joseph} } @article {356, title = {Sequencing of sporadic Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) identifies novel and potentially pathogenic de novo variants and excludes overlap with genes associated with autism spectrum disorder.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet}, volume = {174}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jun}, pages = {381-389}, abstract = {

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has high heritability; however, studies of common variation account for <5\% of ADHD variance. Using data from affected participants without a family history of ADHD, we sought to identify de novo variants that could account for sporadic ADHD. Considering a total of 128 families, two analyses were conducted in parallel: first, in 11 unaffected parent/affected proband trios (or quads with the addition of an unaffected sibling) we completed exome sequencing. Six de novo missense variants at highly conserved bases were identified and validated from four of the 11 families: the brain-expressed genes TBC1D9, DAGLA, QARS, CSMD2, TRPM2, and WDR83. Separately, in 117 unrelated probands with sporadic ADHD, we sequenced a panel of 26 genes implicated in intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to evaluate whether variation in ASD/ID-associated genes were also present in participants with ADHD. Only one putative deleterious variant (Gln600STOP) in CHD1L was identified; this was found in a single proband. Notably, no other nonsense, splice, frameshift, or highly conserved missense variants in the 26 gene panel were identified and validated. These data suggest that de novo variant analysis in families with independently adjudicated sporadic ADHD diagnosis can identify novel genes implicated in ADHD pathogenesis. Moreover, that only one of the 128 cases (0.8\%, 11 exome, and 117 MIP sequenced participants) had putative deleterious variants within our data in 26 genes related to ID and ASD suggests significant independence in the genetic pathogenesis of ADHD as compared to ASD and ID phenotypes. {\textcopyright} 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

}, keywords = {Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Biomarkers, Child, Exome, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Male, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype}, issn = {1552-485X}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.b.32527}, author = {Kim, Daniel Seung and Burt, Amber A and Ranchalis, Jane E and Wilmot, Beth and Smith, Joshua D and Patterson, Karynne E and Coe, Bradley P and Li, Yatong K and Bamshad, Michael J and Nikolas, Molly and Eichler, Evan E and Swanson, James M and Nigg, Joel T and Nickerson, Deborah A and Jarvik, Gail P} } @article {105, title = {Gene discovery for Mendelian conditions via social networking: de novo variants in KDM1A cause developmental delay and distinctive facial features.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {18}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 08}, pages = {788-95}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: The pace of Mendelian gene discovery is slowed by the "n-of-1 problem"-the difficulty of establishing the causality of a putatively pathogenic variant in a single person or family. Identification of an unrelated person with an overlapping phenotype and suspected pathogenic variant in the same gene can overcome this barrier, but it is often impeded by lack of a convenient or widely available way to share data on candidate variants/genes among families, clinicians, and researchers.

METHODS: Social networking among families, clinicians, and researchers was used to identify three children with variants of unknown significance in KDM1A and similar phenotypes.

RESULTS: De novo variants in KDM1A underlie a new syndrome characterized by developmental delay and distinctive facial features.

CONCLUSION: Social networking is a potentially powerful strategy to discover genes for rare Mendelian conditions, particularly those with nonspecific phenotypic features. To facilitate the efforts of families to share phenotypic and genomic information with each other, clinicians, and researchers, we developed the Repository for Mendelian Genomics Family Portal (RMD-FP; http://uwcmg.org/$\#$/family). Design and development of MyGene2 (http://www.mygene2.org), a Web-based tool that enables families, clinicians, and researchers to search for gene matches based on analysis of phenotype and exome data deposited into the RMD-FP, is under way.Genet Med 18 8, 788-795.

}, keywords = {Child, Child, Preschool, Databases, Factual, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Histone Demethylases, Humans, Information Dissemination, Male, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype, Social Networking, Web Browser}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/gim.2015.161}, author = {Chong, Jessica X and Yu, Joon-Ho and Lorentzen, Peter and Park, Karen M and Jamal, Seema M and Tabor, Holly K and Rauch, Anita and Saenz, Margarita Sifuentes and Boltshauser, Eugen and Patterson, Karynne E and Nickerson, Deborah A and Bamshad, Michael J} } @article {149, title = {The Genetic Basis of Mendelian Phenotypes: Discoveries, Challenges, and Opportunities.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {97}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Aug 06}, pages = {199-215}, abstract = {

Discovering the genetic basis of a Mendelian phenotype establishes a causal link between genotype and phenotype, making possible carrier and population screening and direct diagnosis. Such discoveries also contribute to our knowledge of gene function, gene regulation, development, and biological mechanisms that can be used for developing new therapeutics. As of February 2015, 2,937 genes underlying 4,163 Mendelian phenotypes have been discovered, but the genes underlying \~{}50\% (i.e., 3,152) of all known Mendelian phenotypes are still unknown, and many more Mendelian conditions have yet to be recognized. This is a formidable gap in biomedical knowledge. Accordingly, in December 2011, the NIH established the Centers for Mendelian Genomics (CMGs) to provide the collaborative framework and infrastructure necessary for undertaking large-scale whole-exome sequencing and discovery of the genetic variants responsible for Mendelian phenotypes. In partnership with 529 investigators from 261 institutions in 36 countries, the CMGs assessed 18,863 samples from 8,838 families representing 579 known and 470 novel Mendelian phenotypes as of January 2015. This collaborative effort has identified 956 genes, including 375 not previously associated with human health, that underlie a Mendelian phenotype. These results provide insight into study design and analytical strategies, identify novel mechanisms of disease, and reveal the extensive clinical variability of Mendelian phenotypes. Discovering the gene underlying every Mendelian phenotype will require tackling challenges such as worldwide ascertainment and phenotypic characterization of families affected by Mendelian conditions, improvement in sequencing and analytical techniques, and pervasive sharing of phenotypic and genomic data among researchers, clinicians, and families.

}, keywords = {Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Phenotype, Proteins}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.06.009}, author = {Chong, Jessica X and Buckingham, Kati J and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Boehm, Corinne and Sobreira, Nara and Smith, Joshua D and Harrell, Tanya M and McMillin, Margaret J and Wiszniewski, Wojciech and Gambin, Tomasz and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Doheny, Kimberly and Scott, Alan F and Avramopoulos, Dimitri and Chakravarti, Aravinda and Hoover-Fong, Julie and Mathews, Debra and Witmer, P Dane and Ling, Hua and Hetrick, Kurt and Watkins, Lee and Patterson, Karynne E and Reinier, Frederic and Blue, Elizabeth and Muzny, Donna and Kircher, Martin and Bilguvar, Kaya and L{\'o}pez-Gir{\'a}ldez, Francesc and Sutton, V Reid and Tabor, Holly K and Leal, Suzanne M and G{\"u}nel, Murat and Mane, Shrikant and Gibbs, Richard A and Boerwinkle, Eric and Hamosh, Ada and Shendure, Jay and Lupski, James R and Lifton, Richard P and Valle, David and Nickerson, Deborah A and Bamshad, Michael J} }