@article {617, title = {Predicting human genes susceptible to genomic instability associated with /-mediated rearrangements.}, journal = {Genome Res}, volume = {28}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 08}, pages = {1228-1242}, abstract = {

elements, the short interspersed element numbering more than 1 million copies per human genome, can mediate the formation of copy number variants (CNVs) between substrate pairs. These /-mediated rearrangements (AAMRs) can result in pathogenic variants that cause diseases. To investigate the impact of AAMR on gene variation and human health, we first characterized s that are involved in mediating CNVs (CNV-s) and observed that these s tend to be evolutionarily younger. We then computationally generated, with the assistance of a supercomputer, a test data set consisting of 78 million pairs and predicted \~{}18\% of them are potentially susceptible to AAMR. We further determined the relative risk of AAMR in 12,074 OMIM genes using the count of predicted CNV- pairs and experimentally validated the predictions with 89 samples selected by correlating predicted hotspots with a database of CNVs identified by clinical chromosomal microarrays (CMAs) on the genomes of approximately 54,000 subjects. We fine-mapped 47 duplications, 40 deletions, and two complex rearrangements and examined a total of 52 breakpoint junctions of simple CNVs. Overall, 94\% of the candidate breakpoints were at least partially mediated. We successfully predicted all (100\%) of pairs that mediated deletions ( = 21) and achieved an 87\% positive predictive value overall when including AAMR-generated deletions and duplications. We provided a tool, AluAluCNVpredictor, for assessing AAMR hotspots and their role in human disease. These results demonstrate the utility of our predictive model and provide insights into the genomic features and molecular mechanisms underlying AAMR.

}, keywords = {Alu Elements, DNA Copy Number Variations, Gene Duplication, Genome, Human, Genomic Instability, Humans, Sequence Deletion}, issn = {1549-5469}, doi = {10.1101/gr.229401.117}, author = {Song, Xiaofei and Beck, Christine R and Du, Renqian and Campbell, Ian M and Coban-Akdemir, Zeynep and Gu, Shen and Breman, Amy M and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Ira, Grzegorz and Shaw, Chad A and Lupski, James R} } @article {102, title = {Multiallelic Positions in the Human Genome: Challenges for Genetic Analyses.}, journal = {Hum Mutat}, volume = {37}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Mar}, pages = {231-234}, abstract = {

As the amount of human genomic sequence available from personal genomes and exomes has increased, so too has the observation of genomic positions having two or more alternative alleles, so-called multiallelic sites. For portions of the haploid genome that are present in more than one copy, including segmental duplications, variation at such multisite variant positions becomes even more complex. Despite the frequency of multiallelic variants, a number of commonly used resources and tools in genomic research and diagnostics do not support these multiallelic variants all together or require special modifications. Here, we explore the frequency of multiallelic sites in large samples with whole exome sequencing and discuss potential outcomes of failing to account for multiple variant alleles. We also briefly discuss some commonly utilized resources that fully support multiallelic sites.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Exome, Genome, Human, Humans}, issn = {1098-1004}, doi = {10.1002/humu.22944}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Gambin, Tomasz and Jhangiani, Shalini and Grove, Megan L and Veeraraghavan, Narayanan and Muzny, Donna M and Shaw, Chad A and Gibbs, Richard A and Boerwinkle, Eric and Yu, Fuli and Lupski, James R} } @article {170, title = {Alu-mediated diverse and complex pathogenic copy-number variants within human chromosome 17 at p13.3.}, journal = {Hum Mol Genet}, volume = {24}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul 15}, pages = {4061-77}, abstract = {

Alu repetitive elements are known to be major contributors to genome instability by generating Alu-mediated copy-number variants (CNVs). Most of the reported Alu-mediated CNVs are simple deletions and duplications, and the mechanism underlying Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangement has been attributed to non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Chromosome 17 at the p13.3 genomic region lacks extensive low-copy repeat architecture; however, it is highly enriched for Alu repetitive elements, with a fraction of 30\% of total sequence annotated in the human reference genome, compared with the 10\% genome-wide and 18\% on chromosome 17. We conducted mechanistic studies of the 17p13.3 CNVs by performing high-density oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization, specifically interrogating the 17p13.3 region with \~{}150 bp per probe density; CNV breakpoint junctions were mapped to nucleotide resolution by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Studied rearrangements include 5 interstitial deletions, 14 tandem duplications, 7 terminal deletions and 13 complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs). Within the 17p13.3 region, Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangements were identified in 80\% of the interstitial deletions, 46\% of the tandem duplications and 50\% of the CGRs, indicating that this mechanism was a major contributor for formation of breakpoint junctions. Our studies suggest that Alu repetitive elements facilitate formation of non-recurrent CNVs, CGRs and other structural aberrations of chromosome 17 at p13.3. The common observation of Alu-mediated rearrangement in CGRs and breakpoint junction sequences analysis further demonstrates that this type of mechanism is unlikely attributed to NAHR, but rather may be due to a recombination-coupled DNA replicative repair process.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Alu Elements, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gene Duplication, Gene Rearrangement, Genome, Human, Genomic Instability, Genomics, Homologous Recombination, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Segmental Duplications, Genomic, Sequence Deletion}, issn = {1460-2083}, doi = {10.1093/hmg/ddv146}, author = {Gu, Shen and Yuan, Bo and Campbell, Ian M and Beck, Christine R and Carvalho, Claudia M B and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Patel, Ankita and Bacino, Carlos A and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Cheung, Sau Wai and Bi, Weimin and Lupski, James R} } @article {107, title = {Comparative Genomic Analyses of the Human NPHP1 Locus Reveal Complex Genomic Architecture and Its Regional Evolution in Primates.}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {11}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Dec}, pages = {e1005686}, abstract = {

Many loci in the human genome harbor complex genomic structures that can result in susceptibility to genomic rearrangements leading to various genomic disorders. Nephronophthisis 1 (NPHP1, MIM$\#$ 256100) is an autosomal recessive disorder that can be caused by defects of NPHP1; the gene maps within the human 2q13 region where low copy repeats (LCRs) are abundant. Loss of function of NPHP1 is responsible for approximately 85\% of the NPHP1 cases-about 80\% of such individuals carry a large recurrent homozygous NPHP1 deletion that occurs via nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between two flanking directly oriented ~45 kb LCRs. Published data revealed a non-pathogenic inversion polymorphism involving the NPHP1 gene flanked by two inverted ~358 kb LCRs. Using optical mapping and array-comparative genomic hybridization, we identified three potential novel structural variant (SV) haplotypes at the NPHP1 locus that may protect a haploid genome from the NPHP1 deletion. Inter-species comparative genomic analyses among primate genomes revealed massive genomic changes during evolution. The aggregated data suggest that dynamic genomic rearrangements occurred historically within the NPHP1 locus and generated SV haplotypes observed in the human population today, which may confer differential susceptibility to genomic instability and the NPHP1 deletion within a personal genome. Our study documents diverse SV haplotypes at a complex LCR-laden human genomic region. Comparative analyses provide a model for how this complex region arose during primate evolution, and studies among humans suggest that intra-species polymorphism may potentially modulate an individual{\textquoteright}s susceptibility to acquiring disease-associated alleles.

}, keywords = {Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Alleles, Animals, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Dosage, Gene Rearrangement, Genome, Human, Genomic Structural Variation, Haplotypes, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Cystic, Membrane Proteins, Primates}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1005686}, author = {Yuan, Bo and Liu, Pengfei and Gupta, Aditya and Beck, Christine R and Tejomurtula, Anusha and Campbell, Ian M and Gambin, Tomasz and Simmons, Alexandra D and Withers, Marjorie A and Harris, R Alan and Rogers, Jeffrey and Schwartz, David C and Lupski, James R} } @article {169, title = {Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.}, journal = {Trends Genet}, volume = {31}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul}, pages = {382-92}, abstract = {

Nearly all of the genetic material among cells within an organism is identical. However, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions (indels), copy-number variants (CNVs), and other structural variants (SVs) continually accumulate as cells divide during development. This process results in an organism composed of countless cells, each with its own unique personal genome. Thus, every human is undoubtedly mosaic. Mosaic mutations can go unnoticed, underlie genetic disease or normal human variation, and may be transmitted to the next generation as constitutional variants. We review the influence of the developmental timing of mutations, the mechanisms by which they arise, methods for detecting mosaic variants, and the risk of passing these mutations on to the next generation.

}, keywords = {Animals, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Humans, Mosaicism, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion}, issn = {0168-9525}, doi = {10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.013}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Lupski, James R} }