@article {169, title = {Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.}, journal = {Trends Genet}, volume = {31}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul}, pages = {382-92}, abstract = {

Nearly all of the genetic material among cells within an organism is identical. However, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions (indels), copy-number variants (CNVs), and other structural variants (SVs) continually accumulate as cells divide during development. This process results in an organism composed of countless cells, each with its own unique personal genome. Thus, every human is undoubtedly mosaic. Mosaic mutations can go unnoticed, underlie genetic disease or normal human variation, and may be transmitted to the next generation as constitutional variants. We review the influence of the developmental timing of mutations, the mechanisms by which they arise, methods for detecting mosaic variants, and the risk of passing these mutations on to the next generation.

}, keywords = {Animals, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Humans, Mosaicism, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion}, issn = {0168-9525}, doi = {10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.013}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Lupski, James R} } @article {245, title = {Structural variation and missense mutation in SBDS associated with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome.}, journal = {BMC Med Genet}, volume = {15}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jun 04}, pages = {64}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an autosomal recessive ribosomopathy caused mainly by compound heterozygous mutations in SBDS. Structural variation (SV) involving the SBDS locus has been rarely reported in association with the disease. We aimed to determine whether an SV contributed to the pathogenesis of a case lacking biallelic SBDS point mutations.

CASE PRESENTATION: Whole exome sequencing was performed in a patient with SDS lacking biallelic SBDS point mutations. Array comparative genomic hybridization and Southern blotting were used to seek SVs across the SBDS locus. Locus-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) encompassing flanking intronic sequence was also performed to investigate mutation within the locus. RNA expression and Western blotting were performed to analyze allele and protein expression. We found the child harbored a single missense mutation in SBDS (c.98A > C; p.K33T), inherited from the mother, and an SV in the SBDS locus, inherited from the father. The missense allele and SV segregated in accordance with Mendelian expectations for autosomal recessive SDS. Complementary DNA and western blotting analysis and locus specific PCR support the contention that the SV perturbed SBDS protein expression in the father and child.

CONCLUSION: Our findings implicate genomic rearrangements in the pathogenesis of some cases of SDS and support patients lacking biallelic SBDS point mutations be tested for SV within the SBDS locus.

}, keywords = {Abdomen, Alleles, Bone Marrow Diseases, Cell Line, Transformed, Child, Preschool, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Mutational Analysis, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency, Female, Gene Order, Humans, Lipomatosis, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Mutation, Mutation, Missense, Pedigree, Proteins, Radiography, Abdominal, Ultrasonography}, issn = {1471-2350}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2350-15-64}, author = {Carvalho, Claudia M B and Zuccherato, Luciana W and Williams, Christopher L and Neill, Nicholas J and Murdock, David R and Bainbridge, Matthew and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Muzny, Donna M and Gibbs, Richard A and Ip, Wan and Guillerman, Robert Paul and Lupski, James R and Bertuch, Alison A} }