@article {915, title = {Low-level parental somatic mosaic SNVs in exomes from a large cohort of trios with diverse suspected Mendelian conditions.}, journal = {Genet Med}, volume = {22}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 11}, pages = {1768-1776}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the scale of low-level parental mosaicism in exome sequencing (ES) databases.

METHODS: We analyzed approximately 2000 family trio ES data sets from the Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics (BHCMG) and Baylor Genetics (BG). Among apparent de novo single-nucleotide variants identified in the affected probands, we selected rare unique variants with variant allele fraction (VAF) between 30\% and 70\% in the probands and lower than 10\% in one of the parents.

RESULTS: Of 102 candidate mosaic variants validated using amplicon-based next-generation sequencing, droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, or blocker displacement amplification, 27 (26.4\%) were confirmed to be low- (VAF between 1\% and 10\%) or very low (VAF <1\%) level mosaic. Detection precision in parental samples with two or more alternate reads was 63.6\% (BHCMG) and 43.6\% (BG). In nine investigated individuals, we observed variability of mosaic ratios among blood, saliva, fibroblast, buccal, hair, and urine samples.

CONCLUSION: Our computational pipeline enables robust discrimination between true and false positive candidate mosaic variants and efficient detection of low-level mosaicism in ES samples. We confirm that the presence of two or more alternate reads in the parental sample is a reliable predictor of low-level parental somatic mosaicism.

}, keywords = {Exome, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Mosaicism, Parents, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1530-0366}, doi = {10.1038/s41436-020-0897-z}, author = {Gambin, Tomasz and Liu, Qian and Karolak, Justyna A and Grochowski, Christopher M and Xie, Nina G and Wu, Lucia R and Yan, Yan Helen and Cao, Ye and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep H and Wilson, Theresa A and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Chen, Ed and Eng, Christine M and Muzny, Donna and Posey, Jennifer E and Yang, Yaping and Zhang, David Y and Shaw, Chad and Liu, Pengfei and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {792, title = {Quantitative Assessment of Parental Somatic Mosaicism for Copy-Number Variant (CNV) Deletions.}, journal = {Curr Protoc Hum Genet}, volume = {106}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 06}, pages = {e99}, abstract = {

As genome sequencing methodologies have become more sensitive in detecting low-frequency rare-variant events, the link between post-zygotic mutagenesis and somatic mosaicism in the etiology of several human genetic conditions other than cancers has become more clear. Given that current clinical-genomics diagnostic methods have limited detection sensitivity for mosaic events, a copy-number variant (CNV) deletion inherited from a parent with low-level (<10\%) mosaicism can be erroneously interpreted in the proband to represent a de novo germline event. Here, we describe three sensitive, precise, and cost-efficient methods that can quantitatively assess the potential degree of parental somatic mosaicism levels for CNV deletions: droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), PCR amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), and quantitative PCR. ddPCR using the EvaGreen fluorescent dye protocol can specifically quantify the deleted or non-deleted alleles by analyzing the number of droplets positive for a fluorescent signal for each event. PCR amplicon-based NGS assesses the allele frequencies of a heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphism within a deletion region. The difference in number of reads between the two genotypes indicates the level of somatic mosaicism for the CNV deletion. Quantitative PCR can be applied where the relative quantity of the deletion junction-specific product represents the level of mosaicism. Clinical implementation of these quantitative variant-detection methods enables potentially more accurate assessment of disease recurrence risk in family-based genetic counseling, allowing couples to engage in more informed family planning. {\textcopyright} 2020 by John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) Alternate Protocol 1: PCR amplicon-based next-generation sequencing Alternate Protocol 2: Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

}, keywords = {DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Mosaicism, Parents, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction}, issn = {1934-8258}, doi = {10.1002/cphg.99}, author = {Liu, Qian and Grochowski, Christopher M and Bi, Weimin and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} } @article {338, title = {Mutations in EBF3 Disturb Transcriptional Profiles and Cause Intellectual Disability, Ataxia, and Facial Dysmorphism.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {100}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jan 05}, pages = {117-127}, abstract = {

From a GeneMatcher-enabled international collaboration, we identified ten individuals affected by intellectual disability, speech delay, ataxia, and facial dysmorphism and carrying a deleterious EBF3 variant detected by whole-exome sequencing. One 9-bp duplication and one splice-site, five missense, and two nonsense variants in EBF3 were found; the mutations occurred de novo in eight individuals, and the missense variant c.625C>T (p.Arg209Trp) was inherited by two affected siblings from their healthy mother, who is mosaic. EBF3 belongs to the early B cell factor family (also known as Olf, COE, or O/E) and is a transcription factor involved in neuronal differentiation and maturation. Structural assessment predicted that the five amino acid substitutions have damaging effects on DNA binding of EBF3. Transient expression of EBF3 mutant proteins in HEK293T cells revealed mislocalization of all but one mutant in the cytoplasm, as well as nuclear localization. By transactivation assays, all EBF3 mutants showed significantly reduced or no ability to activate transcription of the reporter gene CDKN1A, and in~situ subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrated that EBF3 mutant proteins were less tightly associated with chromatin. Finally, in RNA-seq and ChIP-seq experiments, EBF3 acted as a transcriptional regulator, and mutant EBF3 had reduced genome-wide DNA binding and gene-regulatory activity. Our findings demonstrate that variants disrupting EBF3-mediated transcriptional regulation cause intellectual disability and developmental delay and are present in \~{}0.1\% of individuals with unexplained neurodevelopmental disorders.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Amino Acid Substitution, Ataxia, Child, Child, Preschool, Chromatin, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, Developmental Disabilities, Exome, Face, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Reporter, HEK293 Cells, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Language Development Disorders, Male, Models, Molecular, Mosaicism, Mutation, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Protein Transport, Syndrome, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.11.012}, author = {Harms, Frederike Leonie and Girisha, Katta M and Hardigan, Andrew A and Kort{\"u}m, Fanny and Shukla, Anju and Alawi, Malik and Dalal, Ashwin and Brady, Lauren and Tarnopolsky, Mark and Bird, Lynne M and Ceulemans, Sophia and Bebin, Martina and Bowling, Kevin M and Hiatt, Susan M and Lose, Edward J and Primiano, Michelle and Chung, Wendy K and Juusola, Jane and Akdemir, Zeynep C and Bainbridge, Matthew and Charng, Wu-Lin and Drummond-Borg, Margaret and Eldomery, Mohammad K and El-Hattab, Ayman W and Saleh, Mohammed A M and B{\'e}zieau, St{\'e}phane and Cogn{\'e}, Benjamin and Isidor, Bertrand and K{\"u}ry, S{\'e}bastien and Lupski, James R and Myers, Richard M and Cooper, Gregory M and Kutsche, Kerstin} } @article {58, title = {Association of MTOR Mutations With Developmental Brain Disorders, Including Megalencephaly, Focal Cortical Dysplasia, and Pigmentary Mosaicism.}, journal = {JAMA Neurol}, volume = {73}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 07 01}, pages = {836-845}, abstract = {

IMPORTANCE: Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), hemimegalencephaly, and megalencephaly constitute a spectrum of malformations of cortical development with shared neuropathologic features. These disorders are associated with significant childhood morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the underlying molecular cause of FCD, hemimegalencephaly, and diffuse megalencephaly.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with FCD, hemimegalencephaly, or megalencephaly (mean age, 11.7 years; range, 2-32 years) were recruited from Pediatric Hospital A. Meyer, the University of Hong Kong, and Seattle Children{\textquoteright}s Research Institute from June 2012 to June 2014. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 8 children with FCD or hemimegalencephaly using standard-depth (50-60X) sequencing in peripheral samples (blood, saliva, or skin) from the affected child and their parents and deep (150-180X) sequencing in affected brain tissue. Targeted sequencing and WES were used to screen 93 children with molecularly unexplained diffuse or focal brain overgrowth. Histopathologic and functional assays of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT (serine/threonine kinase)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activity in resected brain tissue and cultured neurons were performed to validate mutations.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Whole-exome sequencing and targeted sequencing identified variants associated with this spectrum of developmental brain disorders.

RESULTS: Low-level mosaic mutations of MTOR were identified in brain tissue in 4 children with FCD type 2a with alternative allele fractions ranging from 0.012 to 0.086. Intermediate-level mosaic mutation of MTOR (p.Thr1977Ile) was also identified in 3 unrelated children with diffuse megalencephaly and pigmentary mosaicism in skin. Finally, a constitutional de novo mutation of MTOR (p.Glu1799Lys) was identified in 3 unrelated children with diffuse megalencephaly and intellectual disability. Molecular and functional analysis in 2 children with FCD2a from whom multiple affected brain tissue samples were available revealed a mutation gradient with an epicenter in the most epileptogenic area. When expressed in cultured neurons, all MTOR mutations identified here drive constitutive activation of mTOR complex 1 and enlarged neuronal size.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, mutations of MTOR were associated with a spectrum of brain overgrowth phenotypes extending from FCD type 2a to diffuse megalencephaly, distinguished by different mutations and levels of mosaicism. These mutations may be sufficient to cause cellular hypertrophy in cultured neurons and may provide a demonstration of the pattern of mosaicism in brain and substantiate the link between mosaic mutations of MTOR and pigmentary mosaicism in skin.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Amino Acids, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Developmental Disabilities, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetic Association Studies, Humans, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Male, Malformations of Cortical Development, Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, Megalencephaly, Mosaicism, Multiprotein Complexes, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Rats, Retrospective Studies, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases, Young Adult}, issn = {2168-6157}, doi = {10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0363}, author = {Mirzaa, Ghayda M and Campbell, Catarina D and Solovieff, Nadia and Goold, Carleton and Jansen, Laura A and Menon, Suchithra and Timms, Andrew E and Conti, Valerio and Biag, Jonathan D and Adams, Carissa and Boyle, Evan August and Collins, Sarah and Ishak, Gisele and Poliachik, Sandra and Girisha, Katta M and Yeung, Kit San and Chung, Brian Hon Yin and Rahikkala, Elisa and Gunter, Sonya A and McDaniel, Sharon S and Macmurdo, Colleen Forsyth and Bernstein, Jonathan A and Martin, Beth and Leary, Rebecca and Mahan, Scott and Liu, Shanming and Weaver, Molly and Doerschner, Michael and Jhangiani, Shalini and Muzny, Donna M and Boerwinkle, Eric and Gibbs, Richard A and Lupski, James R and Shendure, Jay and Saneto, Russell P and Novotny, Edward J and Wilson, Christopher J and Sellers, William R and Morrissey, Michael and Hevner, Robert F and Ojemann, Jeffrey G and Guerrini, Renzo and Murphy, Leon O and Winckler, Wendy and Dobyns, William B} } @article {76, title = {Somatic mosaicism underlies X-linked acrogigantism syndrome in sporadic male subjects.}, journal = {Endocr Relat Cancer}, volume = {23}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 04}, pages = {221-33}, abstract = {

Somatic mosaicism has been implicated as a causative mechanism in a number of genetic and genomic disorders. X-linked acrogigantism (XLAG) syndrome is a recently characterized genomic form of pediatric gigantism due to aggressive pituitary tumors that is caused by submicroscopic chromosome Xq26.3 duplications that include GPR101 We studied XLAG syndrome patients (n= 18) to determine if somatic mosaicism contributed to the genomic pathophysiology. Eighteen subjects with XLAG syndrome caused by Xq26.3 duplications were identified using high-definition array comparative genomic hybridization (HD-aCGH). We noted that males with XLAG had a decreased log2ratio (LR) compared with expected values, suggesting potential mosaicism, whereas females showed no such decrease. Compared with familial male XLAG cases, sporadic males had more marked evidence for mosaicism, with levels of Xq26.3 duplication between 16.1 and 53.8\%. These characteristics were replicated using a novel, personalized breakpoint junction-specific quantification droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) technique. Using a separate ddPCR technique, we studied the feasibility of identifying XLAG syndrome cases in a distinct patient population of 64 unrelated subjects with acromegaly/gigantism, and identified one female gigantism patient who had had increased copy number variation (CNV) threshold for GPR101 that was subsequently diagnosed as having XLAG syndrome on HD-aCGH. Employing a combination of HD-aCGH and novel ddPCR approaches, we have demonstrated, for the first time, that XLAG syndrome can be caused by variable degrees of somatic mosaicism for duplications at chromosome Xq26.3. Somatic mosaicism was shown to occur in sporadic males but not in females with XLAG syndrome, although the clinical characteristics of the disease were similarly severe in both sexes.

}, keywords = {Adult, Female, Genetic Diseases, X-Linked, Gigantism, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mosaicism, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Syndrome, Young Adult}, issn = {1479-6821}, doi = {10.1530/ERC-16-0082}, author = {Daly, Adrian F and Yuan, Bo and Fina, Frederic and Caberg, Jean-Hubert and Trivellin, Giampaolo and Rostomyan, Liliya and de Herder, Wouter W and Naves, Luciana A and Metzger, Daniel and Cuny, Thomas and Rabl, Wolfgang and Shah, Nalini and Jaffrain-Rea, Marie-Lise and Zatelli, Maria Chiara and Faucz, Fabio R and Castermans, Emilie and Nanni-Metellus, Isabelle and Lodish, Maya and Muhammad, Ammar and Palmeira, Leonor and Potorac, Iulia and Mantovani, Giovanna and Neggers, Sebastian J and Klein, Marc and Barlier, Anne and Liu, Pengfei and Ouafik, L{\textquoteright}Houcine and Bours, Vincent and Lupski, James R and Stratakis, Constantine A and Beckers, Albert} } @article {169, title = {Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.}, journal = {Trends Genet}, volume = {31}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul}, pages = {382-92}, abstract = {

Nearly all of the genetic material among cells within an organism is identical. However, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions (indels), copy-number variants (CNVs), and other structural variants (SVs) continually accumulate as cells divide during development. This process results in an organism composed of countless cells, each with its own unique personal genome. Thus, every human is undoubtedly mosaic. Mosaic mutations can go unnoticed, underlie genetic disease or normal human variation, and may be transmitted to the next generation as constitutional variants. We review the influence of the developmental timing of mutations, the mechanisms by which they arise, methods for detecting mosaic variants, and the risk of passing these mutations on to the next generation.

}, keywords = {Animals, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome, Human, Humans, Mosaicism, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion}, issn = {0168-9525}, doi = {10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.013}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Shaw, Chad A and Stankiewicz, Pawel and Lupski, James R} } @article {222, title = {Parent of origin, mosaicism, and recurrence risk: probabilistic modeling explains the broken symmetry of transmission genetics.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Oct 02}, pages = {345-59}, abstract = {

Most new mutations are observed to arise in fathers, and increasing paternal age positively correlates with the risk of new variants. Interestingly, new mutations in X-linked recessive disease show elevated familial recurrence rates. In male offspring, these mutations must be inherited from mothers. We previously developed a simulation model to consider parental mosaicism as a source of transmitted mutations. In this paper, we extend and formalize the model to provide analytical results and flexible formulas. The results implicate parent of origin and parental mosaicism as central variables in recurrence risk. Consistent with empirical data, our model predicts that more transmitted mutations arise in fathers and that this tendency increases as fathers age. Notably, the lack of expansion later in the male germline determines relatively lower variance in the proportion of mutants, which decreases with paternal age. Subsequently, observation of a transmitted mutation has less impact on the expected risk for future offspring. Conversely, for the female germline, which arrests after clonal expansion in early development, variance in the mutant proportion is higher, and observation of a transmitted mutation dramatically increases the expected risk of recurrence in another pregnancy. Parental somatic mosaicism considerably elevates risk for both parents. These findings have important implications for genetic counseling and for understanding patterns of recurrence in transmission genetics. We provide a convenient online tool and source code implementing our analytical results. These tools permit varying the underlying parameters that influence recurrence risk and could be useful for analyzing risk in diverse family structures.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chromosome Aberrations, DNA Copy Number Variations, Fathers, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Inheritance Patterns, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Mosaicism, Mothers, Pregnancy, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Young Adult}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.08.010}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Stewart, Jonathan R and James, Regis A and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l} and Olofsson, Peter and Shaw, Chad A} } @article {229, title = {Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {95}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Aug 07}, pages = {173-82}, abstract = {

New human mutations are thought to originate in germ cells, thus making a recurrence of the same mutation in a sibling exceedingly rare. However, increasing sensitivity of genomic technologies has anecdotally revealed mosaicism for mutations in somatic tissues of apparently healthy parents. Such somatically mosaic parents might also have germline mosaicism that can potentially cause unexpected intergenerational recurrences. Here, we show that somatic mosaicism for transmitted mutations among parents of children with simplex genetic disease is more common than currently appreciated. Using the sensitivity of individual-specific breakpoint PCR, we prospectively screened 100 families with children affected by genomic disorders due to rare deletion copy-number variants (CNVs) determined to be de novo by clinical analysis of parental DNA. Surprisingly, we identified four cases of low-level somatic mosaicism for the transmitted CNV in DNA isolated from parental blood. Integrated probabilistic modeling of gametogenesis developed in response to our observations predicts that mutations in parental blood increase recurrence risk substantially more than parental mutations confined to the germline. Moreover, despite the fact that maternally transmitted mutations are the minority of alleles, our model suggests that sexual dimorphisms in gametogenesis result in a greater proportion of somatically mosaic transmitting mothers who are thus at increased risk of recurrence. Therefore, somatic mosaicism together with sexual differences in gametogenesis might explain a considerable fraction of unexpected recurrences of X-linked recessive disease. Overall, our results underscore an important role for somatic mosaicism and mitotic replicative mutational mechanisms in transmission genetics.

}, keywords = {Cell Division, DNA Copy Number Variations, Female, Gametogenesis, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genomics, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Mosaicism, Mutation, Pedigree, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk, Sex Characteristics, Smith-Magenis Syndrome}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.003}, author = {Campbell, Ian M and Yuan, Bo and Robberecht, Caroline and Pfundt, Rolph and Szafranski, Przemyslaw and McEntagart, Meriel E and Nagamani, Sandesh C S and Erez, Ayelet and Bartnik, Magdalena and Wi{\'s}niowiecka-Kowalnik, Barbara and Plunkett, Katie S and Pursley, Amber N and Kang, Sung-Hae L and Bi, Weimin and Lalani, Seema R and Bacino, Carlos A and Vast, Mala and Marks, Karen and Patton, Michael and Olofsson, Peter and Patel, Ankita and Veltman, Joris A and Cheung, Sau Wai and Shaw, Chad A and Vissers, Lisenka E L M and Vermeesch, Joris R and Lupski, James R and Stankiewicz, Pawe{\l}} }