@article {923,
	title = {Alternative genomic diagnoses for individuals with a clinical diagnosis of Dubowitz syndrome.},
	journal = {Am J Med Genet A},
	volume = {185},
	year = {2021},
	month = {2021 01},
	pages = {119-133},
	abstract = {<p>Dubowitz syndrome (DubS) is considered a recognizable syndrome characterized by a distinctive facial appearance and deficits in growth and development. There have been over 200 individuals reported with Dubowitz or a "Dubowitz-like" condition, although no single gene has been implicated as responsible for its cause. We have performed exome (ES) or genome sequencing (GS) for 31 individuals clinically diagnosed with DubS. After genome-wide sequencing, rare variant filtering and computational and Mendelian genomic analyses, a presumptive molecular diagnosis was made in 13/27 (48\%) families. The molecular diagnoses included biallelic variants in SKIV2L, SLC35C1, BRCA1, NSUN2; de novo variants in ARID1B, ARID1A, CREBBP, POGZ, TAF1, HDAC8, and copy-number variation at1p36.11(ARID1A), 8q22.2(VPS13B), Xp22, and Xq13(HDAC8). Variants of unknown significance in known disease genes, and also in genes of uncertain significance, were observed in 7/27 (26\%) additional families. Only one gene, HDAC8, could explain the phenotype in more than one family (N = 2). All but two of the genomic diagnoses were for genes discovered, or for conditions recognized, since the introduction of next-generation sequencing. Overall, the DubS-like clinical phenotype is associated with extensive locus heterogeneity and the molecular diagnoses made are for emerging clinical conditions sharing characteristic features that overlap the DubS phenotype.</p>},
	issn = {1552-4833},
	doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.61926},
	author = {Dyment, David A and O{\textquoteright}Donnell-Luria, Anne and Agrawal, Pankaj B and Coban Akdemir, Zeynep and Aleck, Kyrieckos A and Antaki, Danny and Al Sharhan, Hind and Au, Ping-Yee B and Aydin, Hatip and Beggs, Alan H and Bilguvar, Kaya and Boerwinkle, Eric and Brand, Harrison and Brownstein, Catherine A and Buyske, Steve and Chodirker, Bernard and Choi, Jungmin and Chudley, Albert E and Clericuzio, Carol L and Cox, Gerald F and Curry, Cynthia and de Boer, Elke and de Vries, Bert B A and Dunn, Kathryn and Dutmer, Cullen M and England, Eleina M and Fahrner, Jill A and Geckinli, Bilgen B and Genetti, Casie A and Gezdirici, Alper and Gibson, William T and Gleeson, Joseph G and Greenberg, Cheryl R and Hall, April and Hamosh, Ada and Hartley, Taila and Jhangiani, Shalini N and Karaca, Ender and Kernohan, Kristin and Lauzon, Julie L and Lewis, M E Suzanne and Lowry, R Brian and L{\'o}pez-Gir{\'a}ldez, Francesc and Matise, Tara C and McEvoy-Venneri, Jennifer and McInnes, Brenda and Mhanni, Aziz and Garcia Minaur, Sixto and Moilanen, Jukka and Nguyen, An and Nowaczyk, Malgorzata J M and Posey, Jennifer E and {\~O}unap, Katrin and Pehlivan, Davut and Pajusalu, Sander and Penney, Lynette S and Poterba, Timothy and Prontera, Paolo and Doriqui, Maria Juliana Rodovalho and Sawyer, Sarah L and Sobreira, Nara and Stanley, Valentina and Torun, Deniz and Wargowski, David and Witmer, P Dane and Wong, Isaac and Xing, Jinchuan and Zaki, MAH S and Zhang, Yeting and Boycott, Kym M and Bamshad, Michael J and Nickerson, Deborah A and Blue, Elizabeth E and Innes, A Micheil}
}
@article {924,
	title = {Mutations in Spliceosomal Genes PPIL1 and PRP17 Cause Neurodegenerative Pontocerebellar Hypoplasia with Microcephaly.},
	journal = {Neuron},
	volume = {109},
	year = {2021},
	month = {2021 01 20},
	pages = {241-256.e9},
	abstract = {<p>Autosomal-recessive cerebellar hypoplasia and ataxia constitute a group of heterogeneous brain disorders caused by disruption of several fundamental cellular processes. Here, we identified 10 families showing a neurodegenerative condition involving pontocerebellar hypoplasia with microcephaly (PCHM). Patients harbored biallelic mutations in genes encoding the spliceosome components Peptidyl-Prolyl Isomerase Like-1 (PPIL1) or Pre-RNA Processing-17 (PRP17). Mouse knockouts of either gene were lethal in early embryogenesis, whereas PPIL1 patient mutation knockin mice showed neuron-specific apoptosis. Loss of either protein affected splicing integrity, predominantly affecting short and high GC-content introns and genes involved in brain disorders. PPIL1 and PRP17 form an active isomerase-substrate interaction, but we found that isomerase activity is not critical for function. Thus, we establish disrupted splicing integrity and "major spliceosome-opathies" as a new mechanism underlying PCHM and neurodegeneration and uncover a non-enzymatic function of a spliceosomal proline isomerase.</p>},
	keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cell Cycle Proteins, Cerebellar Diseases, Cohort Studies, Female, Gene Knockout Techniques, HEK293 Cells, Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System, Humans, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Microcephaly, Mutation, Pedigree, Peptidylprolyl Isomerase, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Structure, Tertiary, RNA Splicing Factors, Spliceosomes},
	issn = {1097-4199},
	doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.035},
	author = {Chai, Guoliang and Webb, Alice and Li, Chen and Antaki, Danny and Lee, Sangmoon and Breuss, Martin W and Lang, Nhi and Stanley, Valentina and Anzenberg, Paula and Yang, Xiaoxu and Marshall, Trevor and Gaffney, Patrick and Wierenga, Klaas J and Chung, Brian Hon-Yin and Tsang, Mandy Ho-Yin and Pais, Lynn S and Lovgren, Alysia Kern and VanNoy, Grace E and Rehm, Heidi L and Mirzaa, Ghayda and Leon, Eyby and Diaz, Jullianne and Neumann, Alexander and Kalverda, Arnout P and Manfield, Iain W and Parry, David A and Logan, Clare V and Johnson, Colin A and Bonthron, David T and Valleley, Elizabeth M A and Issa, Mahmoud Y and Abdel-Ghafar, Sherif F and Abdel-Hamid, Mohamed S and Jennings, Patricia and Zaki, MAH S and Sheridan, Eamonn and Gleeson, Joseph G}
}
