@article {752, title = {Whole exome sequencing identified ATP6V1C2 as a novel candidate gene for recessive distal renal tubular acidosis.}, journal = {Kidney Int}, volume = {97}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 03}, pages = {567-579}, abstract = {

Distal renal tubular acidosis is a rare renal tubular disorder characterized by hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and impaired urinary acidification. Mutations in three genes (ATP6V0A4, ATP6V1B1 and SLC4A1) constitute a monogenic causation in 58-70\% of familial cases of distal renal tubular acidosis. Recently, mutations in FOXI1 have been identified as an additional cause. Therefore, we hypothesized that further monogenic causes of distal renal tubular acidosis remain to be discovered. Panel sequencing and/or whole exome sequencing was performed in a cohort of 17 families with 19 affected individuals with pediatric onset distal renal tubular acidosis. A causative mutation was detected in one of the three "classical" known distal renal tubular acidosis genes in 10 of 17 families. The seven unsolved families were then subjected to candidate whole exome sequencing analysis. Potential disease causing mutations in three genes were detected: ATP6V1C2, which encodes another kidney specific subunit of the V-type proton ATPase (1 family); WDR72 (2 families), previously implicated in V-ATPase trafficking in cells; and SLC4A2 (1 family), a paralog of the known distal renal tubular acidosis gene SLC4A1. Two of these mutations were assessed for deleteriousness through functional studies. Yeast growth assays for ATP6V1C2 revealed loss-of-function for the patient mutation, strongly supporting ATP6V1C2 as a novel distal renal tubular acidosis gene. Thus, we provided a molecular diagnosis in a known distal renal tubular acidosis gene in 10 of 17 families (59\%) with this disease, identified mutations in ATP6V1C2 as a novel human candidate gene, and provided further evidence for phenotypic expansion in WDR72 mutations from amelogenesis imperfecta to distal renal tubular acidosis.

}, issn = {1523-1755}, doi = {10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.026}, author = {Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Kl{\"a}mbt, Verena and Tarsio, Maureen and Heneghan, John F and Majmundar, Amar J and Shril, Shirlee and Buerger, Florian and Ottlewski, Isabel and Shmukler, Boris E and Topaloglu, Rezan and Hashmi, Seema and Hafeez, Farkhanda and Emma, Francesco and Greco, Marcella and Laube, Guido F and Fathy, Hanan M and Pohl, Martin and Gellermann, Jutta and Milosevic, Danko and Baum, Michelle A and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Kane, Patricia M and Alper, Seth L and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {587, title = {Genetic variants in the LAMA5 gene in pediatric nephrotic syndrome.}, journal = {Nephrol Dial Transplant}, volume = {34}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 03 01}, pages = {485-493}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Nephrotic syndrome (NS), a chronic kidney disease, is characterized by significant loss of protein in the urine causing hypoalbuminemia and edema. In general, \~{}15\% of childhood-onset cases do not respond to steroid therapy and are classified as steroid-resistant NS (SRNS). In \~{}30\% of cases with SRNS, a causative mutation can be detected in one of 44 monogenic SRNS genes. The gene LAMA5 encodes laminin-α5, an essential component of the glomerular basement membrane. Mice with a hypomorphic mutation in the orthologous gene Lama5 develop proteinuria and hematuria.

METHODS: To identify additional monogenic causes of NS, we performed whole exome sequencing in 300 families with pediatric NS. In consanguineous families we applied homozygosity mapping to identify genomic candidate loci for the underlying recessive mutation.

RESULTS: In three families, in whom mutations in known NS genes were excluded, but in whom a recessive, monogenic cause of NS was strongly suspected based on pedigree information, we identified homozygous variants of unknown significance (VUS) in the gene LAMA5. While all affected individuals had nonsyndromic NS with an early onset of disease, their clinical outcome and response to immunosuppressive therapy differed notably.

CONCLUSION: We here identify recessive VUS in the gene LAMA5 in patients with partially treatment-responsive NS. More data will be needed to determine the impact of these VUS in disease management. However, familial occurrence of disease, data from genetic mapping and a mouse model that recapitulates the NS phenotypes suggest that these genetic variants may be inherited factors that contribute to the development of NS in pediatric patients.

}, issn = {1460-2385}, doi = {10.1093/ndt/gfy028}, author = {Braun, Daniela A and Warejko, Jillian K and Ashraf, Shazia and Tan, Weizhen and Daga, Ankana and Schneider, Ronen and Hermle, Tobias and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Widmeier, Eugen and Majmundar, Amar J and Nakayama, Makiko and Schapiro, David and Rao, Jia and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Hoogstraten, Charlotte A and Hugo, Hannah and Bakkaloglu, Sevcan A and Kari, Jameela A and El Desoky, Sherif and Daouk, Ghaleb and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Shril, Shirlee and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {596, title = {Whole-Exome Sequencing Enables a Precision Medicine Approach for Kidney Transplant Recipients.}, journal = {J Am Soc Nephrol}, volume = {30}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 02}, pages = {201-215}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) finds a CKD-related mutation in approximately 20\% of patients presenting with CKD before 25 years of age. Although provision of a molecular diagnosis could have important implications for clinical management, evidence is lacking on the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of WES for pediatric renal transplant recipients.

METHODS: To determine the diagnostic yield of WES in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, we recruited 104 patients who had received a transplant at Boston Children{\textquoteright}s Hospital from 2007 through 2017, performed WES, and analyzed results for likely deleterious variants in approximately 400 genes known to cause CKD.

RESULTS: By WES, we identified a genetic cause of CKD in 34 out of 104 (32.7\%) transplant recipients. The likelihood of detecting a molecular genetic diagnosis was highest for patients with urinary stone disease (three out of three individuals), followed by renal cystic ciliopathies (seven out of nine individuals), steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (nine out of 21 individuals), congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (ten out of 55 individuals), and chronic glomerulonephritis (one out of seven individuals). WES also yielded a molecular diagnosis for four out of nine individuals with ESRD of unknown etiology. The WES-related molecular genetic diagnosis had implications for clinical care for five patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one third of pediatric renal transplant recipients had a genetic cause of their kidney disease identified by WES. Knowledge of this genetic information can help guide management of both transplant patients and potential living related donors.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Boston, Child, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Testing, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Kidney Transplantation, Male, Precision Medicine, Prognosis, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Analysis, Transplant Recipients, Treatment Outcome, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {1533-3450}, doi = {10.1681/ASN.2018060575}, author = {Mann, Nina and Braun, Daniela A and Amann, Kassaundra and Tan, Weizhen and Shril, Shirlee and Connaughton, Dervla M and Nakayama, Makiko and Schneider, Ronen and Kitzler, Thomas M and van der Ven, Amelie T and Chen, Jing and Ityel, Hadas and Vivante, Asaf and Majmundar, Amar J and Daga, Ankana and Warejko, Jillian K and Lovric, Svjetlana and Ashraf, Shazia and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Widmeier, Eugen and Hugo, Hannah and Mane, Shrikant M and Spaneas, Leslie and Somers, Michael J G and Ferguson, Michael A and Traum, Avram Z and Stein, Deborah R and Baum, Michelle A and Daouk, Ghaleb H and Lifton, Richard P and Manzi, Shannon and Vakili, Khashayar and Kim, Heung Bae and Rodig, Nancy M and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {502, title = { and Mutations Implicate RAB5 Regulation in Nephrotic Syndrome.}, journal = {J Am Soc Nephrol}, volume = {29}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Aug}, pages = {2123-2138}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a frequent cause of CKD. The discovery of monogenic causes of SRNS has revealed specific pathogenetic pathways, but these monogenic causes do not explain all cases of SRNS.

METHODS: To identify novel monogenic causes of SRNS, we screened 665 patients by whole-exome sequencing. We then evaluated the functional significance of two genes and the mutations therein that we discovered through this sequencing and conducted complementary studies in podocyte-like nephrocytes.

RESULTS: We identified conserved, homozygous missense mutations of in two families with early-onset NS and a homozygous missense mutation of in two siblings with SRNS. GAPVD1 and ANKFY1 interact with the endosomal regulator RAB5. Coimmunoprecipitation assays indicated interaction between GAPVD1 and ANKFY1 proteins, which also colocalized when expressed in HEK293T cells. Silencing either protein diminished the podocyte migration rate. Compared with wild-type GAPVD1 and ANKFY1, the mutated proteins produced upon ectopic expression of or bearing the patient-derived mutations exhibited altered binding affinity for active RAB5 and reduced ability to rescue the knockout-induced defect in podocyte migration. Coimmunoprecipitation assays further demonstrated a physical interaction between nephrin and GAPVD1, and immunofluorescence revealed partial colocalization of these proteins in rat glomeruli. The patient-derived mutations reduced nephrin-GAPVD1 binding affinity. In , silencing impaired endocytosis and caused mistrafficking of the nephrin ortholog.

CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in and probably in are novel monogenic causes of NS. The discovery of these genes implicates RAB5 regulation in the pathogenesis of human NS.

}, issn = {1533-3450}, doi = {10.1681/ASN.2017121312}, author = {Hermle, Tobias and Schneider, Ronen and Schapiro, David and Braun, Daniela A and van der Ven, Amelie T and Warejko, Jillian K and Daga, Ankana and Widmeier, Eugen and Nakayama, Makiko and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Majmundar, Amar J and Ashraf, Shazia and Rao, Jia and Finn, Laura S and Tasic, Velibor and Hernandez, Joel D and Bagga, Arvind and Jalalah, Sawsan M and El Desoky, Sherif and Kari, Jameela A and Laricchia, Kristen M and Lek, Monkol and Rehm, Heidi L and MacArthur, Daniel G and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Shril, Shirlee and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {513, title = {Mutations in multiple components of the nuclear pore complex cause nephrotic syndrome.}, journal = {J Clin Invest}, volume = {128}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Oct 01}, pages = {4313-4328}, abstract = {

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) almost invariably progresses to end-stage renal disease. Although more than 50 monogenic causes of SRNS have been described, a large proportion of SRNS remains unexplained. Recently, it was discovered that mutations of NUP93 and NUP205, encoding 2 proteins of the inner ring subunit of the nuclear pore complex (NPC), cause SRNS. Here, we describe mutations in genes encoding 4 components of the outer rings of the NPC, namely NUP107, NUP85, NUP133, and NUP160, in 13 families with SRNS. Using coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we showed that certain pathogenic alleles weakened the interaction between neighboring NPC subunits. We demonstrated that morpholino knockdown of nup107, nup85, or nup133 in Xenopus disrupted glomerulogenesis. Re-expression of WT mRNA, but not of mRNA reflecting mutations from SRNS patients, mitigated this phenotype. We furthermore found that CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of NUP107, NUP85, or NUP133 in podocytes activated Cdc42, an important effector of SRNS pathogenesis. CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of nup107 or nup85 in zebrafish caused developmental anomalies and early lethality. In contrast, an in-frame mutation of nup107 did not affect survival, thus mimicking the allelic effects seen in humans. In conclusion, we discovered here that mutations in 4 genes encoding components of the outer ring subunits of the NPC cause SRNS and thereby provide further evidence that specific hypomorphic mutations in these essential genes cause a distinct, organ-specific phenotype.

}, issn = {1558-8238}, doi = {10.1172/JCI98688}, author = {Braun, Daniela A and Lovric, Svjetlana and Schapiro, David and Schneider, Ronen and Marquez, Jonathan and Asif, Maria and Hussain, Muhammad Sajid and Daga, Ankana and Widmeier, Eugen and Rao, Jia and Ashraf, Shazia and Tan, Weizhen and Lusk, C Patrick and Kolb, Amy and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Hoogstraten, Charlotte A and Eddy, Kaitlyn and Kitzler, Thomas M and Shril, Shirlee and Moawia, Abubakar and Schrage, Kathrin and Khayyat, Arwa Ishaq A and Lawson, Jennifer A and Gee, Heon Yung and Warejko, Jillian K and Hermle, Tobias and Majmundar, Amar J and Hugo, Hannah and Budde, Birgit and Motameny, Susanne and Altm{\"u}ller, Janine and Noegel, Angelika Anna and Fathy, Hanan M and Gale, Daniel P and Waseem, Syeda Seema and Khan, Ayaz and Kerecuk, Larissa and Hashmi, Seema and Mohebbi, Nilufar and Ettenger, Robert and Serdaroglu, Erkin and Alhasan, Khalid A and Hashem, Mais and Goncalves, Sara and Ariceta, Gema and Ubetagoyena, Mercedes and Antonin, Wolfram and Baig, Shahid Mahmood and Alkuraya, Fowzan S and Shen, Qian and Xu, Hong and Antignac, Corinne and Lifton, Richard P and Mane, Shrikant and N{\"u}rnberg, Peter and Khokha, Mustafa K and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {611, title = {Mutations in WDR4 as a new cause of Galloway-Mowat syndrome.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet A}, volume = {176}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Nov}, pages = {2460-2465}, abstract = {

Galloway-Mowat syndrome (GAMOS) is a phenotypically heterogeneous disorder characterized by neurodevelopmental defects combined with renal-glomerular disease, manifesting with proteinuria. To identify additional monogenic disease causes, we here performed whole exome sequencing (WES), linkage analysis, and homozygosity mapping in three affected siblings of an Indian family with GAMOS. Applying established criteria for variant filtering, we identify a novel homozygous splice site mutation in the gene WDR4 as the likely disease-causing mutation in this family. In line with previous reports, we observe growth deficiency, microcephaly, developmental delay, and intellectual disability as phenotypic features resulting from WDR4 mutations. However, the newly identified allele additionally gives rise to proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome, a phenotype that was never reported in patients with WDR4 mutations. Our data thus expand the phenotypic spectrum of WDR4 mutations by demonstrating that, depending on the specific mutated allele, a renal phenotype may be present. This finding suggests that GAMOS may occupy a phenotypic spectrum with other microcephalic diseases. Furthermore, WDR4 is an additional example of a gene that encodes a tRNA modifying enzyme and gives rise to GAMOS, if mutated. Our findings thereby support the recent observation that, like neurons, podocytes of the renal glomerulus are particularly vulnerable to cellular defects resulting from altered tRNA modifications.

}, issn = {1552-4833}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.a.40489}, author = {Braun, Daniela A and Shril, Shirlee and Sinha, Aditi and Schneider, Ronen and Tan, Weizhen and Ashraf, Shazia and Hermle, Tobias and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Widmeier, Eugen and Majmundar, Amar J and Daga, Ankana and Warejko, Jillian K and Nakayama, Makiko and Schapiro, David and Chen, Jing and Airik, Merlin and Rao, Jia and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Hoogstraten, Charlotte A and Hugo, Hannah and Meena, Jitendra and Lek, Monkol and Laricchia, Kristen M and Bagga, Arvind and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {441, title = {Whole exome sequencing frequently detects a monogenic cause in early onset nephrolithiasis and~nephrocalcinosis.}, journal = {Kidney Int}, volume = {93}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 01}, pages = {204-213}, abstract = {

The incidence of nephrolithiasis continues to rise. Previously, we showed that a monogenic cause could be detected in 11.4\% of individuals with adult-onset nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis and in 16.7-20.8\% of individuals with onset before 18 years of age, using gene panel sequencing of 30 genes known to cause nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis. To overcome the limitations of panel sequencing, we utilized whole exome sequencing in 51 families, who presented before age 25 years with at least one renal stone or with a renal ultrasound finding of nephrocalcinosis to identify the underlying molecular genetic cause of disease. In 15 of 51 families, we detected a monogenic causative mutation by whole exome sequencing. A mutation in seven recessive genes (AGXT, ATP6V1B1, CLDN16, CLDN19, GRHPR, SLC3A1, SLC12A1), in one dominant gene (SLC9A3R1), and in one gene (SLC34A1) with both recessive and dominant inheritance was detected. Seven of the 19 different mutations were not previously described as disease-causing. In one family, a causative mutation in one of 117 genes that may represent phenocopies of nephrolithiasis-causing genes was detected. In nine of 15 families, the genetic diagnosis may have specific implications for stone management and prevention. Several factors that correlated with the higher detection rate in our cohort were younger age at onset of nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis, presence of multiple affected members in a family, and presence of consanguinity. Thus, we established whole exome sequencing as an efficient approach toward a molecular genetic diagnosis in individuals with nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis who manifest before age 25 years.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Age of Onset, Child, Child, Preschool, Disease Progression, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Markers, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Heredity, Humans, Infant, Male, Mutation, Nephrocalcinosis, Nephrolithiasis, Pedigree, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Whole Exome Sequencing, Young Adult}, issn = {1523-1755}, doi = {10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.025}, author = {Daga, Ankana and Majmundar, Amar J and Braun, Daniela A and Gee, Heon Yung and Lawson, Jennifer A and Shril, Shirlee and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Vivante, Asaf and Schapiro, David and Tan, Weizhen and Warejko, Jillian K and Widmeier, Eugen and Nelson, Caleb P and Fathy, Hanan M and Gucev, Zoran and Soliman, Neveen A and Hashmi, Seema and Halbritter, Jan and Halty, Margarita and Kari, Jameela A and El-Desoky, Sherif and Ferguson, Michael A and Somers, Michael J G and Traum, Avram Z and Stein, Deborah R and Daouk, Ghaleb H and Rodig, Nancy M and Katz, Avi and Hanna, Christian and Schwaderer, Andrew L and Sayer, John A and Wassner, Ari J and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Milosevic, Danko and Tasic, Velibor and Baum, Michelle A and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {630, title = {Whole Exome Sequencing of Patients with Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome.}, journal = {Clin J Am Soc Nephrol}, volume = {13}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 01 06}, pages = {53-62}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome overwhelmingly progresses to ESRD. More than 30 monogenic genes have been identified to cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. We previously detected causative mutations using targeted panel sequencing in 30\% of patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Panel sequencing has a number of limitations when compared with whole exome sequencing. We employed whole exome sequencing to detect monogenic causes of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in an international cohort of 300 families.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, \& MEASUREMENTS: Three hundred thirty-five individuals with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome from 300 families were recruited from April of 1998 to June of 2016. Age of onset was restricted to <25 years of age. Exome data were evaluated for 33 known monogenic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome genes.

RESULTS: In 74 of 300 families (25\%), we identified a causative mutation in one of 20 genes known to cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. In 11 families (3.7\%), we detected a mutation in a gene that causes a phenocopy of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. This is consistent with our previously published identification of mutations using a panel approach. We detected a causative mutation in a known steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome gene in 38\% of consanguineous families and in 13\% of nonconsanguineous families, and 48\% of children with congenital nephrotic syndrome. A total of 68 different mutations were detected in 20 of 33 steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome genes. Fifteen of these mutations were novel. , , , and were the most common genes in which we detected a mutation. In another 28\% of families, we detected mutations in one or more candidate genes for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS: Whole exome sequencing is a sensitive approach toward diagnosis of monogenic causes of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. A molecular genetic diagnosis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome may have important consequences for the management of treatment and kidney transplantation in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

}, issn = {1555-905X}, doi = {10.2215/CJN.04120417}, author = {Warejko, Jillian K and Tan, Weizhen and Daga, Ankana and Schapiro, David and Lawson, Jennifer A and Shril, Shirlee and Lovric, Svjetlana and Ashraf, Shazia and Rao, Jia and Hermle, Tobias and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Widmeier, Eugen and Majmundar, Amar J and Schneider, Ronen and Gee, Heon Yung and Schmidt, J Magdalena and Vivante, Asaf and van der Ven, Amelie T and Ityel, Hadas and Chen, Jing and Sadowski, Carolin E and Kohl, Stefan and Pabst, Werner L and Nakayama, Makiko and Somers, Michael J G and Rodig, Nancy M and Daouk, Ghaleb and Baum, Michelle and Stein, Deborah R and Ferguson, Michael A and Traum, Avram Z and Soliman, Neveen A and Kari, Jameela A and El Desoky, Sherif and Fathy, Hanan and Zenker, Martin and Bakkaloglu, Sevcan A and M{\"u}ller, Dominik and Noyan, Aytul and Ozaltin, Fatih and Cadnapaphornchai, Melissa A and Hashmi, Seema and Hopcian, Jeffrey and Kopp, Jeffrey B and Benador, Nadine and Bockenhauer, Detlef and Bogdanovic, Radovan and Staji{\'c}, Natasa and Chernin, Gil and Ettenger, Robert and Fehrenbach, Henry and Kemper, Markus and Munarriz, Reyner Loza and Podracka, Ludmila and B{\"u}scher, Rainer and Serdaroglu, Erkin and Tasic, Velibor and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Braun, Daniela A and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {516, title = {Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Causative Mutations in Families with Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract.}, journal = {J Am Soc Nephrol}, volume = {29}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Sep}, pages = {2348-2361}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are the most prevalent cause of kidney disease in the first three decades of life. Previous gene panel studies showed monogenic causation in up to 12\% of patients with CAKUT.

METHODS: We applied whole-exome sequencing to analyze the genotypes of individuals from 232 families with CAKUT, evaluating for mutations in single genes known to cause human CAKUT and genes known to cause CAKUT in mice. In consanguineous or multiplex families, we additionally performed a search for novel monogenic causes of CAKUT.

RESULTS: In 29 families (13\%), we detected a causative mutation in a known gene for isolated or syndromic CAKUT that sufficiently explained the patient{\textquoteright}s CAKUT phenotype. In three families (1\%), we detected a mutation in a gene reported to cause a phenocopy of CAKUT. In 15 of 155 families with isolated CAKUT, we detected deleterious mutations in syndromic CAKUT genes. Our additional search for novel monogenic causes of CAKUT in consanguineous and multiplex families revealed a potential single, novel monogenic CAKUT gene in 19 of 232 families (8\%).

CONCLUSIONS: We identified monogenic mutations in a known human CAKUT gene or CAKUT phenocopy gene as the cause of disease in 14\% of the CAKUT families in this study. Whole-exome sequencing provides an etiologic diagnosis in a high fraction of patients with CAKUT and will provide a new basis for the mechanistic understanding of CAKUT.

}, issn = {1533-3450}, doi = {10.1681/ASN.2017121265}, author = {van der Ven, Amelie T and Connaughton, Dervla M and Ityel, Hadas and Mann, Nina and Nakayama, Makiko and Chen, Jing and Vivante, Asaf and Hwang, Daw-Yang and Schulz, Julian and Braun, Daniela A and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Schapiro, David and Schneider, Ronen and Warejko, Jillian K and Daga, Ankana and Majmundar, Amar J and Tan, Weizhen and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Hermle, Tobias and Widmeier, Eugen and Ashraf, Shazia and Amar, Ali and Hoogstraaten, Charlotte A and Hugo, Hannah and Kitzler, Thomas M and Kause, Franziska and Kolvenbach, Caroline M and Dai, Rufeng and Spaneas, Leslie and Amann, Kassaundra and Stein, Deborah R and Baum, Michelle A and Somers, Michael J G and Rodig, Nancy M and Ferguson, Michael A and Traum, Avram Z and Daouk, Ghaleb H and Bogdanovic, Radovan and Staji{\'c}, Natasa and Soliman, Neveen A and Kari, Jameela A and El Desoky, Sherif and Fathy, Hanan M and Milosevic, Danko and Al-Saffar, Muna and Awad, Hazem S and Eid, Loai A and Selvin, Aravind and Senguttuvan, Prabha and Sanna-Cherchi, Simone and Rehm, Heidi L and MacArthur, Daniel G and Lek, Monkol and Laricchia, Kristen M and Wilson, Michael W and Mane, Shrikant M and Lifton, Richard P and Lee, Richard S and Bauer, Stuart B and Lu, Weining and Reutter, Heiko M and Tasic, Velibor and Shril, Shirlee and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {457, title = {Advillin acts upstream of phospholipase C ϵ1 in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.}, journal = {J Clin Invest}, volume = {127}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 12 01}, pages = {4257-4269}, abstract = {

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a frequent cause of chronic kidney disease. Here, we identified recessive mutations in the gene encoding the actin-binding protein advillin (AVIL) in 3 unrelated families with SRNS. While all AVIL mutations resulted in a marked loss of its actin-bundling ability, truncation of AVIL also disrupted colocalization with F-actin, thereby leading to impaired actin binding and severing. Additionally, AVIL colocalized and interacted with the phospholipase enzyme PLCE1 and with the ARP2/3 actin-modulating complex. Knockdown of AVIL in human podocytes reduced actin stress fibers at the cell periphery, prevented recruitment of PLCE1 to the ARP3-rich lamellipodia, blocked EGF-induced generation of diacylglycerol (DAG) by PLCE1, and attenuated the podocyte migration rate (PMR). These effects were reversed by overexpression of WT AVIL but not by overexpression of any of the 3 patient-derived AVIL mutants. The PMR was increased by overexpression of WT Avil or PLCE1, or by EGF stimulation; however, this increased PMR was ameliorated by inhibition of the ARP2/3 complex, indicating that ARP-dependent lamellipodia formation occurs downstream of AVIL and PLCE1 function. Together, these results delineate a comprehensive pathogenic axis of SRNS that integrates loss of AVIL function with alterations in the action of PLCE1, an established SRNS protein.

}, keywords = {Actin-Related Protein 2-3 Complex, Cell Movement, Diglycerides, Female, Humans, Male, Microfilament Proteins, Mutation, Nephrotic Syndrome, Phosphoinositide Phospholipase C, Podocytes, Pseudopodia}, issn = {1558-8238}, doi = {10.1172/JCI94138}, author = {Rao, Jia and Ashraf, Shazia and Tan, Weizhen and van der Ven, Amelie T and Gee, Heon Yung and Braun, Daniela A and Feh{\'e}r, Krisztina and George, Sudeep P and Esmaeilniakooshkghazi, Amin and Choi, Won-Il and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Schneider, Ronen and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Widmeier, Eugen and Warejko, Jillian K and Hermle, Tobias and Schapiro, David and Lovric, Svjetlana and Shril, Shirlee and Daga, Ankana and Nayir, Ahmet and Shenoy, Mohan and Tse, Yincent and Bald, Martin and Helmchen, Udo and Mir, Sevgi and Berdeli, Afig and Kari, Jameela A and El Desoky, Sherif and Soliman, Neveen A and Bagga, Arvind and Mane, Shrikant and Jairajpuri, Mohamad A and Lifton, Richard P and Khurana, Seema and Martins, Jose C and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {634, title = {Mutations in KEOPS-complex genes cause nephrotic syndrome with primary microcephaly.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {49}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Oct}, pages = {1529-1538}, abstract = {

Galloway-Mowat syndrome (GAMOS) is an autosomal-recessive disease characterized by the combination of early-onset nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) and microcephaly with brain anomalies. Here we identified recessive mutations in OSGEP, TP53RK, TPRKB, and LAGE3, genes encoding the four subunits of the KEOPS complex, in 37 individuals from 32 families with GAMOS. CRISPR-Cas9 knockout in zebrafish and mice recapitulated the human phenotype of primary microcephaly and resulted in early lethality. Knockdown of OSGEP, TP53RK, or TPRKB inhibited cell proliferation, which human mutations did not rescue. Furthermore, knockdown of these genes impaired protein translation, caused endoplasmic reticulum stress, activated DNA-damage-response signaling, and ultimately induced apoptosis. Knockdown of OSGEP or TP53RK induced defects in the actin cytoskeleton and decreased the migration rate of human podocytes, an established intermediate phenotype of SRNS. We thus identified four new monogenic causes of GAMOS, describe a link between KEOPS function and human disease, and delineate potential pathogenic mechanisms.

}, keywords = {Animals, Apoptosis, Carrier Proteins, Cell Movement, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cytoskeleton, DNA Repair, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, Gene Knockout Techniques, Hernia, Hiatal, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Metalloendopeptidases, Mice, Microcephaly, Models, Molecular, Multiprotein Complexes, Mutation, Nephrosis, Nephrotic Syndrome, Podocytes, Protein Conformation, Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases, RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional, RNA, Transfer, Telomere Homeostasis, Zebrafish, Zebrafish Proteins}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/ng.3933}, author = {Braun, Daniela A and Rao, Jia and Mollet, Geraldine and Schapiro, David and Daugeron, Marie-Claire and Tan, Weizhen and Gribouval, Olivier and Boyer, Olivia and Revy, Patrick and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Lawson, Jennifer A and Schanze, Denny and Ashraf, Shazia and Ullmann, Jeremy F P and Hoogstraten, Charlotte A and Boddaert, Nathalie and Collinet, Bruno and Martin, Ga{\"e}lle and Liger, Dominique and Lovric, Svjetlana and Furlano, Monica and Guerrera, I Chiara and Sanchez-Ferras, Oraly and Hu, Jennifer F and Boschat, Anne-Claire and Sanquer, Sylvia and Menten, Bj{\"o}rn and Vergult, Sarah and De Rocker, Nina and Airik, Merlin and Hermle, Tobias and Shril, Shirlee and Widmeier, Eugen and Gee, Heon Yung and Choi, Won-Il and Sadowski, Carolin E and Pabst, Werner L and Warejko, Jillian K and Daga, Ankana and Basta, Tamara and Matejas, Verena and Scharmann, Karin and Kienast, Sandra D and Behnam, Babak and Beeson, Brendan and Begtrup, Amber and Bruce, Malcolm and Ch{\textquoteright}ng, Gaik-Siew and Lin, Shuan-Pei and Chang, Jui-Hsing and Chen, Chao-Huei and Cho, Megan T and Gaffney, Patrick M and Gipson, Patrick E and Hsu, Chyong-Hsin and Kari, Jameela A and Ke, Yu-Yuan and Kiraly-Borri, Cathy and Lai, Wai-Ming and Lemyre, Emmanuelle and Littlejohn, Rebecca Okashah and Masri, Amira and Moghtaderi, Mastaneh and Nakamura, Kazuyuki and Ozaltin, Fatih and Praet, Marleen and Prasad, Chitra and Prytula, Agnieszka and Roeder, Elizabeth R and Rump, Patrick and Schnur, Rhonda E and Shiihara, Takashi and Sinha, Manish D and Soliman, Neveen A and Soulami, Kenza and Sweetser, David A and Tsai, Wen-Hui and Tsai, Jeng-Daw and Topaloglu, Rezan and Vester, Udo and Viskochil, David H and Vatanavicharn, Nithiwat and Waxler, Jessica L and Wierenga, Klaas J and Wolf, Matthias T F and Wong, Sik-Nin and Leidel, Sebastian A and Truglio, Gessica and Dedon, Peter C and Poduri, Annapurna and Mane, Shrikant and Lifton, Richard P and Bouchard, Maxime and Kannu, Peter and Chitayat, David and Magen, Daniella and Callewaert, Bert and van Tilbeurgh, Herman and Zenker, Martin and Antignac, Corinne and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} } @article {405, title = {Mutations in sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase cause nephrosis with ichthyosis and adrenal insufficiency.}, journal = {J Clin Invest}, volume = {127}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Mar 01}, pages = {912-928}, abstract = {

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) causes 15\% of chronic kidney disease cases. A mutation in 1 of over 40 monogenic genes can be detected in approximately 30\% of individuals with SRNS whose symptoms manifest before 25 years of age. However, in many patients, the genetic etiology remains unknown. Here, we have performed whole exome sequencing to identify recessive causes of SRNS. In 7 families with SRNS and facultative ichthyosis, adrenal insufficiency, immunodeficiency, and neurological defects, we identified 9 different recessive mutations in SGPL1, which encodes sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) lyase. All mutations resulted in reduced or absent SGPL1 protein and/or enzyme activity. Overexpression of cDNA representing SGPL1 mutations resulted in subcellular mislocalization of SGPL1. Furthermore, expression of WT human SGPL1 rescued growth of SGPL1-deficient dpl1Δ yeast strains, whereas expression of disease-associated variants did not. Immunofluorescence revealed SGPL1 expression in mouse podocytes and mesangial cells. Knockdown of Sgpl1 in rat mesangial cells inhibited cell migration, which was partially rescued by VPC23109, an S1P receptor antagonist. In Drosophila, Sply mutants, which lack SGPL1, displayed a phenotype reminiscent of nephrotic syndrome in nephrocytes. WT Sply, but not the disease-associated variants, rescued this phenotype. Together, these results indicate that SGPL1 mutations cause a syndromic form of SRNS.

}, keywords = {Aldehyde-Lyases, Animals, Cell Line, Cell Movement, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Humans, Ichthyosis, Lamellar, Male, Mesangial Cells, Mice, Mice, Knockout, Mutation, Nephrotic Syndrome, Protein Transport, Rats}, issn = {1558-8238}, doi = {10.1172/JCI89626}, author = {Lovric, Svjetlana and Goncalves, Sara and Gee, Heon Yung and Oskouian, Babak and Srinivas, Honnappa and Choi, Won-Il and Shril, Shirlee and Ashraf, Shazia and Tan, Weizhen and Rao, Jia and Airik, Merlin and Schapiro, David and Braun, Daniela A and Sadowski, Carolin E and Widmeier, Eugen and Jobst-Schwan, Tilman and Schmidt, Johanna Magdalena and Girik, Vladimir and Capitani, Guido and Suh, Jung H and Lachauss{\'e}e, No{\"e}lle and Arrondel, Christelle and Patat, Julie and Gribouval, Olivier and Furlano, Monica and Boyer, Olivia and Schmitt, Alain and Vuiblet, Vincent and Hashmi, Seema and Wilcken, Rainer and Bernier, Francois P and Innes, A Micheil and Parboosingh, Jillian S and Lamont, Ryan E and Midgley, Julian P and Wright, Nicola and Majewski, Jacek and Zenker, Martin and Schaefer, Franz and Kuss, Navina and Greil, Johann and Giese, Thomas and Schwarz, Klaus and Catheline, Vilain and Schanze, Denny and Franke, Ingolf and Sznajer, Yves and Truant, Anne S and Adams, Brigitte and D{\'e}sir, Julie and Biemann, Ronald and Pei, York and Ars, Elisabet and Lloberas, Nuria and Madrid, Alvaro and Dharnidharka, Vikas R and Connolly, Anne M and Willing, Marcia C and Cooper, Megan A and Lifton, Richard P and Simons, Matias and Riezman, Howard and Antignac, Corinne and Saba, Julie D and Hildebrandt, Friedhelm} }